2p2 data breach/security exploit
Still not sure where the correct place should be but was recommended to post here:
Are the moderators going to let the players know about what happened, there could be the possibility then of responsible disclosure rather than just a pure data dump.
There was something I had posted in the israel/gaza conflict thread. I posted it there because the place where it was otherwise most relevant is guarded by bluegrassplayer.
Its a key observation and it was from russia news media ie RT. It was nonetheless immediately "discredited" by bluegrassplayer via ad hominem. In a reasonable world you don't get to moderate dialogue if you validate ad hominems as reasonable counter arguments.
But I posted this with hidden intention because of the nefarious moderation going on.
The post was about how the concept of AI OBSCURES but doesn't eliminate the connection of outsourcing. So you see BGP is caught red handed promoting security leaks and actively traversing the forum hiding counter information to such leaks.
Luckily, I am able to convince the people who pay my invoices that I do, and that's the only people I care to convince.
As for "TTP", this is all I could find in relation to "TTP", and I doubt it has anything to do with forum software.
No we aren't playing google things we just learned exist. You don't have any knowledge in the field of computer science especially security.
Nick Szabo does tho, its widely believe he was the key player in creating the most secure system on the planet. Here he explains the concept and problems of TTPs: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/tr...
Also Nick Szabo is graduate of George Washington law school. Here you can find a trove of incredibly useful and prescient essays on the nature and evolution of law with respect to technology that now exist etc. https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/search...
There was something I had posted in the israel/gaza conflict thread. I posted it there because the place where it was otherwise most relevant is guarded by bluegrassplayer.
Its a key observation and it was from russia news media ie RT. It was nonetheless immediately "discredited" by bluegrassplayer via ad hominem. In a reasonable world you don't get to moderate dialogue if you validate ad hominems as reasonable counter arguments.
But I posted this with hidden intention because of the nefariou
This BGP sounds like a nefarious and sophisticated actor, working to sabotage the forum from within. I can see why you would find it necessary to deploy these elite counterespionage tactics.
So far whats happened is the "team" working on exploiting the cheating NVG has disappeared from communication, WHILE the mods of NVG have banned from participating in those threads.
No we aren't playing google things we just learned exist. You don't have any knowledge in the field of computer science especially security.
Nick Szabo does tho, its widely believe he was the key player in creating the most secure system on the planet. Here he explains the concept and problems of TTPs: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/tr...
Also Nick Szabo is graduate of George Washington law school. Here you can find a trove of incredibly useful and prescient essays on t
Fascinating stuff. Is Nick coming to the thread too? Might be a while till we get to the N's at this rate, though.
Who is Soaker Patoshi?
Do the "NEW" owners CARE about the integrity of the game?
Every SINCERE player is LOUDLY begging to know.
its 'HTTP'
https://fermatslibrary.com/s/***********...
Why did the old guard ban this from the community's view:
[QUOTE=Ideal Poker by Soaker Patoshi]"PSFTCIAFBIDOJ”
The actions of the DOJ was actually multi-dimensional and consequently there are quite different varieties of persons at the present time who follow, in one way or another, some of the thinking of the DOJ. And of course SOME of its thinking was scientifically accurate and thus not disputable. For example, FT was labeled a Ponzi scheme.
The label “PSFTCIAFBIDOJ" is convenient, but to be safe we should have a defined meaning for this as a party that can be criticized and contrasted with other parties.
So let us define “PSFTCIAFBIDOJ“ to be descriptive of a “school of thought" that originated at the time of Black Friday on April 15 2011. Then, more specifically, a “PSFTCIAFBIDOJ" would favor the existence of a “manipulative" state establishment of raked poker and poker skin which would continuously seek to achieve “raked" objectives with comparatively little regard for the long term reputation of the poker currency and the associated effects of that on the reputation of poker sites domestic to the state. And indeed a very famous saying of PSFTCIAFBIDOJ was “...in the long run we will all be dead...".[/QUOTE]
It was written by Nash, why does Nash's work "Ideal Money" scare the old guard here:
[QUOTE=Ideal Money by John Nash]Keynesians”
The thinking of J. M. Keynes was actually multi- dimensional and consequently there are quite different varieties of persons at the present time who follow, in one way or another, some of the thinking of Keynes. And of course SOME of his thinking was scientifically accurate and thus not disputable. For example, an early book written by Keynes was the mathematical text “A Treatise on Probability”.
The label “Keynesian” is convenient, but to be safe we should have a defined meaning for this as a party that can be criticized and contrasted with other parties.
So let us define “Keynesian” to be descriptive of a “school of thought” that originated at the time of the devaluations of the pound and the dollar in the early 30’s of the 20th century. Then, more specifically, a “Keynesian” would favor the existence of a “manipulative” state establishment of central bank and treasury which would continuously seek to achieve “economic welfare” objectives with comparatively little regard for the long term reputation of the national currency and the associated effects of that on the reputation of financial enterprises domestic to the state. And indeed a very famous saying of Keynes was ”...in the long run we will all be dead ...”.[/QUOTE]
And how did I know I could trap them with it?
^^^ thats called 'an esoteric key'
ideal poker is an esoteric key for ideal money
Hi JoeyChicago
The players would like to know what you know about culture of multi-accounting and cheating with respect to such.
Any comments Joey?
And by "the players" he means jbouton.
What the PLAYERS want to know is all the secrets found by jbouton, but he REFUSES to tell us!
JBOUTON, what are you HIDING? WHY won't you tell us already?
i played poker for the first time in about 15 years the other day. the rake was higher than i remember and stars looks terrible now with weird menus all over the place
a roll-back to a previous save state is needed. count me IN
i played poker for the first time in about 15 years the other day. the rake was higher than i remember and stars looks terrible now with weird menus all over the place
a roll-back to a previous save state is needed. count me IN
Wait till you see what they buried. You are a real player. You know what happened to the game.
It was dnegs, josem, and mason.
https://fermatslibrary.com/s/***********...
Why did the old guard ban this from the community's view:
It was written by Nash, why does Nash's work "Ideal Money" scare the old guard here:
And how did I know I could trap them with it?
I give... How did you know? And what exactly do you know?
I have everything back to 2009. Its EVERYONE.
Thats why no one but joey would dare come here to support my efforts and why Joey wants to deal with things via dm. Nope.
Its REALLY easy to see kids look:
I found a new concept based on works nash produced AFTER all of his fame. By taking his game theoretical concepts from his work Ideal Money (as well as some peripheral works of his) I was able to identify a missing concept that was critical from the players standpoint:
[QUOTE=Ideal Poker by Soaker Patoshi]
The Confessional of Targeting
It was the observation of a new “line" that has become popular with those responsible for “raked" functions relating to national poker sites that gave us the idea for the study of “asymptotically rakeless" poker.
The idea seems paradoxical, but by speaking of “rake targeting" these responsible officials are effectively CONFESSING that, notwithstanding how they formerly were speaking about the difficulties and problems of their functions, that it is indeed after all possible to control rake by controlling the supply of chips (as if by limiting the amount of individual “prints" that could be made of a work of art being produced as “prints"). This popularity of the line of “rake targeting" seems to have started in the US, which is the place, among the USA, Canada, Australia, and Europe, which had the most losing players. And we can note also that US was hardly a place where any crisis of poverty really forced them to not maintain the value of their chips but rather just a place where “raked" thinking wasprobably very influential.
Our observation, based on thinking in terms of “the long term" rather than in terms of “short range expediency", wassimply that there is no ideal rate of rake that should be selected and chosen as the target but rather that the ideal concept would necessarily be that of a zero rate for what is called rake.
But of course, also, poker sites of a state cannot actually do anything of the form that can be called “rake targeting" without having some means for measuring rake. How would they do this? The means for measuring inflation that they would naturally use would be a “deposits raked" index relating to domestic transactions within the territory of the state[/QUOTE]
It wasn't easy to understand this concept at the time, but I knew as bitcoin unfolded, when it become a household name in poker, the players would better be able to understand, what the old guard did in hiding these insights:
[QUOTE=Ideal Money by John Nash]
The Confessional of Targeting
It was the observation of a new “line” that has become popular with those responsible for “central banking” functions relating to national currencies that gave us the idea for the study of “asymptotically ideal” money.
The idea seems paradoxical, but by speaking of “inflation targeting” these responsible officials are effectively CONFESSING that, notwithstanding how they formerly were speaking about the difficulties and problems of their functions, that it is indeed after all possible to control inflation by controlling the supply of money (as if by limiting the amount of individual “prints” that could be made of a work of art being produced as “prints”😉.
This popularity of the line of “inflation targeting” seems to have started in New Zealand, which is the place, among the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, which had the most depreciated dollar. And we can note also that New Zealand was hardly a place where any crisis of poverty really forced them to not maintain the value of their dollar but rather just a place where “Keynesian” thinking was probably very influential.
Our observation, based on thinking in terms of “the long term” rather than in terms of “short range expediency”, was simply that there is no ideal rate of inflation that should be selected and chosen as the target but rather that the ideal concept would necessarily be that of a zero rate for what is called inflation.
But of course, also, central monetary authorities of a state cannot actually do anything of the form that can be called “inflation targeting” without having some means for measuring inflation. How would they do this? The means for measuring inflation that they would naturally use would be a “cost of living” index relating to domestic prices within the territory of the state.
In the USA the standard domestic “cost of living” index has a long history and it actually originated back in the days when the USA was still on the “gold standard” with regard to the monetary standards being accepted then. And most states nowadays having large domestic economies also have some sort of an analogous index of prices.[/QUOTE]
They weren't just hiding MY ideas you see. They were hiding nash's ideas, on a poker forum.
