Learning 4 bet strategies

Learning 4 bet strategies

Hey all,

Looking for some advice on how to simplify and learn 4 betting strategies.

When I learned 3 betting ranges I simplified by grouping all the IP positions. So my raising range from HJ, CO, and BTN vs. UTG are the same. I also don't mix hands more granular than 50/50.

Now I am looking over the 4 betting ranges and I am not sure I will be able to use these simplifications. It looks like some hands mix raise, call, and fold.

Any advice on how I can simplify these ranges?

21 February 2024 at 04:50 PM
Reply...

5 Replies



You can simplify ranges in a similar way to 3betting.

For example, you can group 4bets depending on the opponent's 3bet stat:


I also think there is no need to mix hands at micro-limits on 4bet, Call and Fold. Just simplify to 50/50 4bet/Call or 50/50 Call/Fold.


Don't forget about being deep enough to still play 'poker' after the Flop .. GL


by slyless k

You can simplify ranges in a similar way to 3betting.

For example, you can group 4bets depending on the opponent's 3bet stat:

I also think there is no need to mix hands at micro-limits on 4bet, Call and Fold. Just simplify to 50/50 4bet/Call or 50/50 Call/Fold.

Hey thanks for the reply! Any idea where I can find charts based off V 3bet %. I typically use GTO wizard for ranges and I don't think they have that (at least on the free version)


You can use GTO Wizard.
For example, you can adapt the standard range of def vs 3Bet CO vs BU ( BU 3Bet 13%):

GTO Wizard range:

Spoiler
Show


Simplified range:

Spoiler
Show


If your opponent 3Bet 11% then use HJ vs BU range, etc.


by slyless k

You can use GTO Wizard.
For example, you can adapt the standard range of def vs 3Bet CO vs BU ( BU 3Bet 13%):

GTO Wizard range:

Spoiler
Show

Simplified range:

Spoiler
Show

If your opponent 3Bet 11% then use HJ vs BU range, etc.

Any idea if you can check your EV loss of a proposed strategy against GTO wizard? When ever I use the range builder to create my own simplified ranges it gives me around 80% accuracy which doesn't seem that good.

Reply...