Can someone explain (MTT Graph Question)
5 Replies
first, 7k hands isnt a big sample. your winrate could change a lot over the next 10k hands.
second, bb/100 is not an accurate measure of mtt success; roi is. you could be very good at the early stages, and bad at the late stages, while maintaining an attractive bb/100. unfortunately a 10bb mistake in the end stages will cost you much more profitability than a 10bb mistake early.
if possible i would display as $ results, and filter for total buyins, total cashes, return on investment, itm%, itm roi.
you might glance at $ results and stats between now and when u top 1k tourneys, but theres not much to be learned unless youre really screwing up. more importantly you should be striving to learn between now and 1k tourneys(and beyond of course), so when you get there you'll be a far better player than you were at game 1.
i think it looks pretty good. 49% roi probably unsustainable but its quite probable that you're playing well.
maybe try filtering for different buy in ranges and see what the stats look like at the more expensive games in particular. those are the games to study for, if you're hoping to move up.
im having trouble reconciling the original 7k hand sample with the 1600 tourney sample. avg just over 4 hands per tourney doesnt add up.
I lost most of my hands.
Sharkscope is from 2021 (not 22) to present and is set for $0-70. I am break even 88-109 with low volume.
Hand2Note is from 5/7ths from this year. I played a decent amount on another computer and cannot retrieve those hands. So lots of missing information.
Most sites will forward your hand histories if you request them via email.