Legitmate Concern About iPoker RNG & Suspiscious Play (Graphs Included)
Legitmate Concern About iPoker RNG & Suspiscious Play (Graphs Included)

Legitmate Concern About iPoker RNG & Suspiscious Play (Graphs Included)

Hey everyone,

I know everyone rolls their eyes when someone says card rigging but this is a very very real concern about the iPoker network and possible collusion.

I have gone donw every avenue of approach to get answers about the almost negligable chance of this kind of bad variance but nobody from the authoritve gambling commisions will address which is making it more suspect.

Literally losing probably 8 or 9 out of 10 turn jams with 95% chance to win with a full house.

Losing around 3/4 of all in jams when oppoenent is the underdog with AX and I have AK.

Invariably oppoenents rivering sets after calling down with a low pocket pair on AAX or AXX boards despit heavy bets

KK losing consistently all in preflop.

Again I have hard evdience and data aggregated to show that there is something possibly unnatural going on and wonfering if anyone else has noticed iPoker making very very suspect run outs?

If so let me know because its really odd.

Heres graphs showing over 150k approx of non-stop downswinging.

May to todays date:


yearly


30 September 2025 at 04:33 AM
Reply...

7 Replies



Hi!

Bad "luck", man...

And, yes, this case was attentively investigated and discussed on two forums.

Ignored by Curacao Gaming Control Board
Ignored by Gipsy Team forum
Ignored by probability forum team
Ignored by iPoker's support

All this you can find here (statistical reports regarding dependencies in the card dealing process of iPoker, results of communicating with 10 countries, and many other stuff)

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

Have fun reading...


does it bother you that the graph he is showing doesnt fit your theory at all John?


by donjonnie m

does it bother you that the graph he is showing doesnt fit your theory at all John?

To be fair, DJ, I'm surprised to see these graphs, yes.

I have heard about some of these situations with huge under EV runs. But, my expectations is that the software would rather "rig it hidden".

Personally, I never met this kind of stuff on iPoker, when you win seriously under EV.

You are correct here, DJ, my materials are rather discribing "rigging schemes". They are not about going under EV.

And dunner863 should be attentive to this, I agree.
I can only admit that I registered statistical violations, so, he can know, that the game is not random. And be "prepared" for this kind of stuff. I mean, iPoker can rig it any possible way, if they do rig. Surprised, that they go for this kind of "open" rigging (fact won <<< EV).


by donjonnie m

does it bother you that the graph he is showing doesnt fit your theory at all John?

Hello Don, what do you mean by "does it bother you that the graph he is showing doesnt fit your theory at all John?". Have you been discussing this thing before?


Mine is not as bad as yours but the weird thing is that the hands are from around May. Before this time, I didnt have this kind of run.



by Johnmir m

To be fair, DJ, I'm surprised to see these graphs, yes.I have heard about some of these situations with huge under EV runs. But, my expectations is that the software would rather "rig it hidden".Personally, I never met this kind of stuff on iPoker, when you win seriously under EV.You are correct here, DJ, my materials are rather discribing "rigging schemes". They are not about

I dont think anybody should be attentive to the things you imagine.

I just wanted to point out that these results just like the results run contrary to your theory.

Does it not bother you that you constantly have to move goalpost and use weird explanation as to why one set of data applies and another doesnt?

If you constantly have to change parameters, cherry pick and ignore results and outcomes doesnt that make you think that maybe your theory just isnt right?

I told you before and I am telling you again. This all stems from your delusion of being a top player.

I have seen your thoughts on poker here and on Gypsy team and I am saying this not to insult but you are terrible at poker.

You have done a lot of work but focus on the absolutely wrong things.

Every time you have discussed a hand you made a fool out of yourself.

I know I know you have bluffed 7 times in a row which makes you the next redbaron.

When actually your fascination with this absolutely meaningless metric is the best proof that you dont get poker.

I do believe that you have what it takes to become a very good player if you focus your energy on it instead of trying to prove to yourself that you dont need to improve as you are a hidden genius.

I dont think i have ever seen a man as insistent on not improving himself.

by dunner863 m

Hello Don, what do you mean by "does it bother you that the graph he is showing doesnt fit your theory at all John?". Have you been discussing this thing before?

John has been posting on here for a while about his theory, he considers it proven, that Ipoker is rigged in a way that makes it impossible for people to be ev+ longterm as the software is rigged to equalise players.

This theory obviously had to be adapted and the goalpost moved as there is ample evidence of a lot of players generating positive equity and results in real money.

So John introduced a rule to the theory that if you adhere to some vague set of rules like multitabling (multitabling across multiple poker rooms works too) you are granted some ev and winnings as you help keep the games going as a multitabling regular.

My theory is that this theory is simply his attempt to explain to himself why he is unable to beat the games. He considers himself to be one of the top poker payers in the world maybe the best. Yet he has been unable to beat even micro stakes online.

Now when we look at your results, it becomes apparent that they dont make any sense in the context of his theory.


by jbcelo m

Mine is not as bad as yours but the weird thing is that the hands are from around May. Before this time, I didnt have this kind of run.

very very strange indeed. Heres my graph from May until today.

Have you been losing constantly with AK/AQ/AJ vs AX against the maniacs and fish?

Have your flushes been consistently been outdrawn to full houses?

Or AA/KK invariably losing to all sizes of pocket pairs all in preflop?

I want to ask because I am noticing even getting it all in with a full house on the turn I will be outdrawn 90+% of the time.

Look forward to your response and would you be willing to provide your data archive for submission.

I am already in contact with Paddy Powers investigation team.

Reply...