The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition
Bad beats are part of the game. I understand that. But after absorbing more than my fair share on Poker Stars I switched
Its a matter of record. They tracked every other player perfectly with tons of players with over 20k+ games, none of the data being wiped. Why would sharkscope wipe ONLY yoar games but leave 78?
Also, you could be lying about it being your main site for years or that you were actually any good 15 years ago.... It sounds strange right, but then again, you've been caught lying before. Even when its really obvious and not even possible chronologically.
You didnt but you did brag about a silver star. Probably without thinking of the logical next step because thats what you do.
Probably you also didnt research your sharkscope numbers because you think research is "unhealthy"
Your recollection and memory often seemed to have failed you and not comply with the real numbers at all before so I think that just happened again. It really isnt more uncanny than sharkscope picking you out to throw a chunk of tournaments away but keep them for EVERYBODY ELSE.
Also, if sharkscope is lying about your numbers how can we be sure they are not lying about your precious silver star since they got you all wrong??
I had the star for years with the games and profit, i cant explain why the star remains, but the figures have gone
Nobody can waddy thats the thing. But im a bit disappointed that even you cant think of a next lie to justify these numbers.
Remember just yesterday when you told these numbers were this way because you tried it out after the migration to pokerstars even though its the 8 years prior to that and therefore cannot be possible?
And whats even more uncanny is that the numbers have stayed up there for literally everybody else. Its ONLY you that lost the numbers. This conspiracy goes deep, but remember waddy: Whenever you hit rock bottom, grab a shuffle and dig deeper:p
i believe that TheWaddy earned a silver star on Sharkscope, by playing 78 games over 7.5yrs and this is the amount of games he ever played there
I dont have to "believe", I can just check. You can do as well as well.
And with these facts I am completely comfortable swearing on my mothers life/memory whatever that means to you.
You think its odd that that phrase has never been said before? You realize your sharkscope results on full tilt were posted YESTERDAY?
But lets see if you hold the same conviction of your claims even though they go against the laws of time themselves:
The 78 games was to try it out when Pokerstars had got their grubby influence, switching it to their decks
Can you swear on your mothers life/memory the above made claim that you only played there to check out the new rigged deck from the migration to pokerstars even though you played there from 2008 to 2016 and the full tilt switch to stars happened after that in 2016?
If you dont, you were caught lying (which you are)
If you do, thats bye bye mommy I fear :p
odd that when they claim to be speaking the truth, hmmmmmm?
Lets see if these two conniving idiots will type the sentence.... then again they are so low, they might......
You think its odd someone hasnt said anything in a way that means they are convinced. But if they say that sentence they are so low???
Are you getting paid each time you contradict yourself within the minute? Because if thats true I believe you have made a fortune.
It'll be the first time you actually proved anything so best of luck
Might I suggest to you looking up your sharkscope profile, all the proof is there to see 😉
Slugant/Donjohnnie... will you post these words;
'I swear on my mothers life/memory that i believe that TheWaddy earned a silver star on Sharkscope, by playing 78 games over 7.5yrs and this is the amount of games he ever played there'.
In your own time. As i said anyone involved in Poker sites avoid this and as i said, they answer with all sorts but never are prepared to back their comments to this extent.
Regardless of the Sharkscope incorrrect figures shown, you have stated that i 'never got out of micro stakes' just recently, so you didnt need any proof from there anyway. So in your opinion, this would be wholly consistent as me as a player, right?
