Las Vegas Poker Player Vlogs
Gobbo other Thread got closed by the mod said it doesn't belong in the House of Blogs, hoping we can have this one without Trooper talk.
This thread is to discuss local professional poker players on their journey. Please refrain from mentioning the local youtube celebrity who plays poker.
Links to their youtube channels
Andrew Neeme
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLTP4Ns...
PokerKraut
https://www.youtube.com/user/Pokerkraut
Tappan
https://www.youtube.com/user/tappanmoore
Rules of this thread and an excerpt from About The Forums Trooper97 discussion thread.
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/55/ab...
This now stands for this thread:
Trooper97 vlogs, discussions etc. will be allowed to continue in the new thread. That thread will not be unchained and I will work with the other LVL mods to keep it civil.
I personally am not going to allow a lot of the horrible posting that went on in the original thread to take place and I will be very generous with post deletions and bans if needed.
Posts the are overly derogatory, mean spirited, name calling (including using rude derivatives of names) , and demeaning posts towards any of the vloggers or posters in the thread will be deleted at the mods discretion. If any accounts persistently do this they will be banned or exiled from posting in this thread. In these cases we may issue a warning first.
Accounts that are used only to or substantially to troll post in this thread will be banned.
No personal family information or situations allowed in the thread.
Update April 2018
********************
OK Vlogger Thread, we are going with some new parameters to try to make this the POSITIVE vlogger thread that it is supposed to be, not the AIDS vlogger thread where a few loonies ruin it for the rest. Note that 'positive' does not equal 'only positive', it means anything negative being said CAN'T be namecalling or wild, unsubstantiated speculation regarding any and all vloggers. Personal lives and anything aside from poker is OFF THE TABLE.
If exiled and you can't post in thi
Exiled posters:
Registered 2018
sucio44
Turdzilla
rubikon
kaartman
Alex Trebek's Cat
Outoftime4444
NoQuarter
patriots
Me2theEV
OneMoreRun
mitsi
Stormtrooper97 - unexiled
Playlive
drawn
Escapologist
LetsChaseTheDream1
GentlemanJack
vafongool
Threeflight
OtimistPrime2020
A new update March 2019:
NO ****ING POLITICS!
I doubt Rice has ever admitted to being wrong about anything.
Also, I've played tournaments in many casinos where cards are dealt to the stacks, regardless of whether the player is seated or not. If the player is not seated by the time the last card is dealt then their cards are mucked by the dealer. No idea if this is what they do at Orleans or not, just saying it's not a crazy ass thing like Rice assumes.
His player had not arrived at the table yet. There was no stack.
Whoever this Orleans dealer is that has been coaching Diesel up, he deserves to be sung praises on here and be recognized as the great dealer he is. You know he’s a big help when Diesel admits he has been wrong about something and this dealer has been right about everything. Reveal yourself anonymous, dealer, you probably have saved Diesel’s life or at least his dignity, he was one 60bb suckout away from eating out of dumpsters.
How did you determine that Rice's audience does not play poker whatsoever? While his viewership is unlikely to be as poker centric as Andrew Neeme or Brad Owen viewers, that doesn't mean that they have zero awareness about poker concepts.
What Rice does goes well beyond just explaining. He repeats the same point over and over again, just with slight variations in wording and with multiple examples, often even using props and silly diagrams.
As has been pointed out before, he does this because he
Why do you assume the audience is monolithic? I did not say the entire audience does not play poker whatsoever; his viewership is heterogeneous. I think he goes into detail when he explains things so that all of his viewers understand, not just the regular players. If he merely said there must be 3 low cards on the board for there to be a low, do you think non-players know that low cards must be an 8 or under and Aces play as low?
I feel like with pokernomad that his vlog is kind of us just watching him... with others it was like an adventure in a way. I think this was best about trooper and like neeme it seemed like he was wanted to engage with pokernomad it's kind of the feeling 8s he wants to talk but not engage with his viewers. Is just him talking about things. He seems attention seek8ng more so than others even if he doesn't want to come off that way.
Think Blue Poker is dealing at the WSOP and has been showing the EDR food near daily. Here's an example @3:30 mark:
Broken YouTube LinkOrleans is giving away various appliances every week. You have to get 50 tier points. You get 1 tier point for $5 coin-in. That's equivalent to 75 tier credits at CET. What are they giving away this Thursday? A rice cooker! It looks pretty jazzy too. Diesel's best friend/brother/schizoid personality should tell him about it.
If you are addressing an audience that does not play poker whatsoever, then yes, it is helpful to explain what is going on with a scenario so they understand, at least partially. Thank you for the reasonable reply.
Are you aware that Rice does this regardless of the topic of his video?
“This place sells good hotdogs but they cost $6. So if you only have $4 you won’t be able to buy one. If you only have $5 you won’t be able to buy one. If you have $7 you can buy one. If you have $18 you can buy three.” (Holds three ostentatiously selected fingers up to emphasize the number of $6 hotdogs you can buy with $18.)
Whoever this Orleans dealer is that has been coaching Diesel up, he deserves to be sung praises on here and be recognized as the great dealer he is. You know he’s a big help when Diesel admits he has been wrong about something and this dealer has been right about everything. Reveal yourself anonymous, dealer, you probably have saved Diesel’s life or at least his dignity, he was one 60bb suckout away from eating out of dumpsters.
It's funny how Rice is constantly encountering people "incorrectly" thinking that he is wrong on things. And he's that arrogant know it all type who will argue something to the death even when he's in the wrong. You just know it's eventually going to backfire on him.
Vlogger: Think Blue Poker is dealing at the WSOP and has been showing the EDR food near daily. Here's an example @3:30 mark:
I just watched and subscribed to this guy.
www.youtube.com/@ThinkBluePoker
The Rice man himself watches this guy, and was in the comments.
It's funny how Rice is constantly encountering people "incorrectly" thinking that he is wrong on things. And he's that arrogant know it all type who will argue something to the death even when he's in the wrong. You just know it's eventually going to backfire on him.
He doesn't have the wit to argue anything to death. He will likely just repeat himself over and over.
"Blah blah blah...nah nah nah nah" kind of deal.
Are you aware that Rice does this regardless of the topic of his video?
“This place sells good hotdogs but they cost $6. So if you only have $4 you won’t be able to buy one. If you only have $5 you won’t be able to buy one. If you have $7 you can buy one. If you have $18 you can buy three.” (Holds three ostentatiously selected fingers up to emphasize the number of $6 hotdogs you can buy with $18.)
Which vlog does he discuss the hotdogs? Can you link the video please? Thanks
Except no one here said anything negative about that. That's a perfectly reasonable thing to explain.
Originally Posted by Koshka View Post
Diesel explaining how split pot games work as far when you don't have to worry about stacking chips in preparation for a split is another example of Diesel talking to his audience like they're 8 years old.
Diesel - "You need at least three low cards for a low to be possible. If the flop has three high cards, no low is possible. If there's only one low card on the turn, no low is possible. If on the river, there was two high cards and two low cards on the turn and the river is another high card or pairs the board, you don't have to worry about splitting the pot."
It's another example of Diesel overexplaining a simple concept three different ways.
I wonder what he thinks the average IQ is of his vlog watchers are.
It's funny how Rice is constantly encountering people "incorrectly" thinking that he is wrong on things. And he's that arrogant know it all type who will argue something to the death even when he's in the wrong. You just know it's eventually going to backfire on him.
Yeah that’s standard diesel, anyone he encounters in real life is a drooling idiot that is inferior to diesel. That even happened when Herbs and Rye thought Hawaiian Gardens was unincorporated but diesel smugly told him it is a city.
When this legendary Orleans dealer started talking, Diesel shut up and listened real quick with no arguing. Obv Diesel realized listening to this guy is going to make him money and even Diesel has a price to admit he’s wrong.
Originally Posted by Koshka View Post
Diesel explaining how split pot games work as far when you don't have to worry about stacking chips in preparation for a split is another example of Diesel talking to his audience like they're 8 years old.
Diesel - "You need at least three low cards for a low to be possible. If the flop has three high cards, no low is possible. If there's only one low card on the turn, no low is possible. If on the river, there was two high cards and two low cards on the turn
He’s actually wrong about not stacking the pot when there’s no low possible. Unless the Orleans is different than most rooms you should always stack the pot in a split pot game. If you only stack when there’s a possible low and don’t stack when no low is possible, you could influence action and give away information.
Originally Posted by Koshka View Post
Diesel explaining how split pot games work as far when you don't have to worry about stacking chips in preparation for a split is another example of Diesel talking to his audience like they're 8 years old.
Diesel - "You need at least three low cards for a low to be possible. If the flop has three high cards, no low is possible. If there's only one low card on the turn, no low is possible. If on the river, there was two high cards and two low cards on the turn
Like I said, no one criticized Rice for explaining what constitutes a low card in Omaha 8.
It's funny how Rice is constantly encountering people "incorrectly" thinking that he is wrong on things. And he's that arrogant know it all type who will argue something to the death even when he's in the wrong. You just know it's eventually going to backfire on him.
Were he ever to become a lawyer, he could make a nice living "arguing something to death even when he is in the wrong."
NVG has been a good sandbox to practice such tactics for much of the last 20 years, especilly when the Poker Players Alliance was around arguing about legalization in the US.
Originally Posted by Koshka View Post
Diesel explaining how split pot games work as far when you don't have to worry about stacking chips in preparation for a split is another example of Diesel talking to his audience like they're 8 years old.
Diesel - "You need at least three low cards for a low to be possible. If the flop has three high cards, no low is possible. If there's only one low card on the turn, no low is possible. If on the river, there was two high cards and two low cards on the turn
I admittedly did not see that video, but I would hardly call that quote "over-explaining".. I think it sounds pretty concise and gives holdem players some easy things to remember if they venture into Hi-Lo Players can use such help drilled into them on a regular basis.
Personally, I stopped playing "8 or better" years ago because too many times a couple of idiots got into raising battles when they were going to lose 1/4 with perfect lows.....
If I want a "4 hole card, six-way" experience, I stuck to Omaha High.
This post of yours is a transparent attempt at obfuscation.
It was pointed out that Rice uses this form of communication in which he beats a simple point into the ground with endless repetitive explanations.
As simply one example of that, the poster used Rice’s most recent vlog in which he beat into the ground the explanation of the number of low cards that must appear on the board to make a low possible.
Rather than engage with the poster’s broader point—that Rice beats his explanations into the ground—you sliced and diced it into the narrowest form possible and argued that, hey, he’s talking to non-poker experts who mostly want to know about Vegas comps so he needs to make sure they understand. Why people who are interested not in poker but in Vegas comps would want to sit through a detailed explanation of how many low cards must appear on the board in order to make a qualifying low possible is a question for another time.
What’s relevant to this discussion is that I pointed out to you that Rice’s endless explanations of very basic points is in no way limited to something as esoteric as low hands in poker. The man is perfectly happy to beat any topic into the ground with endless iterations of the same basic point. To illustrate this for you, I presented what is known as a hypothetical, one that involved $6 hot dogs.
I suspect that you know what a hypothetical is, but if not, look it up. Rather than engage with the point I was making, however, the point that the hypothetical made—that Rice will beat any topic at all into the ground—you attempted to change the subject by declaring that, “Hey, you know what? He never made a vlog about $6 hot dogs!” You presented this as a Gotcha! moment, but all you really did was make clear that you are unable to counter the point that, you know, Rice gives six examples of very simple and unsophisticated concepts.
Your many posts in this thread in defense of Rice are revealing you as yet another “childhood friend” of the man. You’re not fooling anyone.
how many hotdogs can i get if i have about 3 fiddy?
This post of yours is a transparent attempt at obfuscation.
It was pointed out that Rice uses this form of communication in which he beats a simple point into the ground with endless repetitive explanations.
As simply one example of that, the poster used Rice’s most recent vlog in which he beat into the ground the explanation of the number of low cards that must appear on the board to make a low possible.
Rather than engage with the poster’s broader point—that Rice beats his explanations into the
Oh you want to play it like that I see. Many of you regular posters on here suffer from egomania and it's plain as day. I am no friend of El Diesel and have never met him in person. I don't even know his actual name, oddly enough. I think more than anything, my contrarian views on most topics in this forum don't even stem from "defending" El Diesel, but calling out arrogant know-it-alls when I see them. I really don't see how you all can be so negatively affected by his supposed over-explaining things. Do you have some sort of personality disorder or do you just indulge in picking people apart for entertainment? Which is it?
ItÂ’s just so great that el diesel is so smart and good at everything while being a complete loser to the point where getting a job as a dealer is a major life and income upgrade to him.