x/f flush draw on turn
1/2 NL. I have about 250 and I think all villains cover. About 40% limped pots, raise takes it maybe 15% of the time, and there is a 3! 5-10% of the time. I raise to 10 UTG+1 with Th9h. LJ, BTN, and SB call. Flop is 3h3s2h, x, I cbet 20 into about 40, LJ calls, fold, fold. Turn pot about 78 is 2c for 3h3s2h2c. I check, bet 25, I fold.
11 Replies
I don't understand the multiway flop bet.
I am calling a bet anyway, and might take it down representing 99+ if everyone missed. Might take it on the turn with a better turn card. I can't represent a 3 very well though raising in ep. Obviously, not good I get raised.
You should have a better plan for the hand than "I might be able to win here if I keep betting..."
Yeah, keep betting and try to take it down or maybe hit a flush or pair and hope it is good. Is there a better way to play it?
When the board became 3322, I could possibly be drawing dead and I couldn't represent a boat as the ep raiser.
Betting flop is obviously fine
bit optimistic innit?
You could go smaller on flop too. Getting it heads up I would barrel turn. 3322 isn't nearly as bad as say JJ55. Even with a bunch of fish cold callers there would be as many boats on the turn when fish could be cold calling hands like JTo+, A5s, 65s, 54s, etc. There are less suited and offsuit hands thst hit a 3 or 2 here, even if they can have some A2s, A3s.
You could go smaller on flop too. Getting it heads up I would barrel turn. 3322 isn't nearly as bad as say JJ55. Even with a bunch of fish cold callers there would be as many boats on the turn when fish could be cold calling hands like JTo+, A5s, 65s, 54s, etc. There are less suited and offsuit hands thst hit a 3 or 2 here, even if they can have some A2s, A3s.
I didn't think villain usually had a full house. However, I couldn't see plausible value hands I would continue with. I don't think I would play JJ strongly on 3322. Maybe it doesn't matter if we assume villain is a fish. Also, if I hit a flush, I couldn't play it strongly on that board.
I didn't think villain usually had a full house. However, I couldn't see plausible value hands I would continue with. I don't think I would play JJ strongly on 3322. Maybe it doesn't matter if we assume villain is a fish. Also, if I hit a flush, I couldn't play it strongly on that board.
If villain doesn't usually have a full house. Why wouldn't you keep betting JJ? And if villain doesn't have a full house that often, why not bet your flush when you hit. Or check call if you prefer.
Villain has a lot of pocket pairs 44-88. You can potentially have a lot of outs.
Yeah, I kind of thought afterwards that he probably had 44-88, particularly when he bet smallish when I checked. Wasn't sure if the fold was bad.
You have to choose between 5x'ing preflop and opening hands like T9s in EP. Don't think you can do both.
The flop is pretty barren for our opponents, we have a strong betting hand, I'm assuming opponents are passive...and it's still not a 100% bet at this size. So I don't agree in this particular instance with people saying check OTF, but I probably like the way they're playing their overall range more than I like people who are advocating a bet here.
We can continue OTT most of the time. Once we check, I'm also inclined to give up on my hand, but we may be priced in at this size...
