5/10 nuts to no
Just sat down, buy in 10k I cover BB. Post behind button 810o
4 limps to me, I check, button calls. BB makes it 50$???. He's running good according to info from as friend, and is a strange passive player but is also capable of aggression at weird times IMO. Don't have a ton of history with him. All call.
Flop 279r. He best 120$ into 350. All fold to me, I call button calls.
Turn 6r.
He best 300$ I make it 1200$, button folds, BB calls.
River 2, he ships for 4000$ and I?
7 Replies
Not a big fan of posting and checking our option with T8o in the CO.
I might raise the flop when he bets 1/3 pot and we're open-ended, just to take control of the betting, and possibly buy us a free river card if he checks to us on a turn brick.
As played, the river jam of $4k into $3k is pretty gross. With no reads, I probably puke-call. If he's just never bluffing, I guess we can fold. With the "aggression at weird times" read, I think it's probably a sigh-call.
If he flopped a set or some weird 2P that boated up on the river (72 maybe for the lulz?), then nice hand, good game.
Otherwise, not sure what there is to discuss when you over-limp T8o and get this runout.
Maybe next time raise the flop, or raise bigger on the turn, like $1800 or even $2k.
I would just flat the turn on a rainbow board there instead of potentially folding everyone out but that's just me personally, there's nothing wrong with raising if you think they're hands are strong.
His pot sweetener raise pre could be 77 or 99 more than JJ through AA since he would of probably raised more after all those limps, but maybe not.
I would fold since he's a passive player and they don't usually open jam rivers for an overbet vs multiple players without the nuts or close to it.
As played, the river jam of $4k into $3k is pretty gross. With no reads, I probably puke-call. If he's just never bluffing, I guess we can fold. With the "aggression at weird times" read, I think it's probably a sigh-call.
Let's not forget that we do beat some of his value hands, especially if Villain has a premium PP and thinks Hero's two-pair was counterfeited on the river.
Although shoving an overpair seems spewy, the read was that Villain is unpredictably spazzy.
It feels like a call, but I wasn't there and it isn't my money 😀
Would definitely raise the flop - can't call this river bet. We're repping T8 - maybe sets as well yet he calls our turn raise and rips the river once the board pairs. There's literally no draws on this board - he would have to be a complete maniac to make this call.
Let's not forget that we do beat some of his value hands, especially if Villain has a premium PP and thinks Hero's two-pair was counterfeited on the river.
Although shoving an overpair seems spewy, the read was that Villain is unpredictably spazzy.
It feels like a call, but I wasn't there and it isn't my money 😀
Like I said, with the "aggression at weird times" read, I can see calling.
But how often do you see even the most spewy-spazzy recs flat call a turn raise and then donk-over-bet jam river for 1.3x pot (and 400bb's) on a brick with just an over-pair to the board, when the IP player limp-calls a raise pre, and this iis the run-out?
It's hard to believe anyone would categorize an over-pair as a value hand here, as played. Harder still to believe it for 400bb's in a 5/10 game.
There are no busted draws on the river that bluff and can't see much worse value (overpair betting for value against counterfeited two-pair is a stretch IMO). Against a villain described as passive and capable of sporadic aggression this is a fold. I mean, 97s is a great bluffing candidate but as an x-r (plus it doesn't seem likely Villain would implement such a strategy on the fly). 99 and 77 are in his range, given preflop and b-c on turn.
