View: highly winning players don't make good poker coahes

Hi all,

Recently there was a dispute in the Omaha forum about whether someone winning at poker over a long sample qualifies them to be a poker coach. Obviously there are many factors that go into teaching others, but being good at what you are teaching would seem to me to be a necessary, if not sufficient, condition to teach.

So, what do you think? Does crushing the games mean someone can help others crush as well? Or are other soft skills equally if not more important?

Thanks,
DT