*** August 2024 High Stakes Thread ***
*** August 2024 High Stakes Thread ***
8
zs

*** August 2024 High Stakes Thread ***

Previous High Stakes thread: *** July 2024 High Stakes Thread ***

: : :

We generally post ~200bb+ pots, but if there's an

01 August 2024 at 05:08 AM
Reply...

316 Replies

8
zs


that was a very trippy read


He starts with his belief that he self sabotages and the last sentence he mentions preparing for a new match with LLinusLLove.




Having religious moments and having psychotic episodes are very close to each other. Some might argue that both are the same... However, both supply lots of dopamine

Sry for my bad english, but i'm sure you get what i mean


My ex-lover Alena Mironenko, in collusion with Maxim Shatilov, stole 3 million dollars from me 2 years ago. Of course, it's my own fault, how could I think of giving a girl my iPad with a photo of the seed phrase on it.

How could you think of having an unencrypted photo of a $3M seed phrase in your iPad. Period.

I thought pro players at least understood the basics of digital security.


my man been hitting the shroom shakes a little too hard


by Rahm93 m

I don't think anyone in this line up was winning in yesterdays Coin $100/200 game. Most regs understand that better games can warrant a higher rake, similar to GGs model where winning players subsidise the recreationals but for the games to run long term it has to be theoretically beatable for at least someone at the table. Charging $250 (1.25bb) a hand with large antes at $100

Due to the action I really consider playing on coinpoker and I looked up the rake structure, which I have attached below. At 200 it should be 0,25bb cap for 5+ players. If the game is 5+ I‘m sure it‘s a great lineup. The other lines are HU and 3/4 max. Is this not accurate?
I think 30% rakeback is standard at the site as well.
Other sites/apps have 2-3bb cap and it doesn‘t matter how high you play. I also don‘t understand, why the actual money really matters. Normally the edge doesn‘t decrease the higher you play.



By your logic, a NL2 grinder with +15bb/100 could move up to NL200 and still win 15bb/100... Or same from 200 to 20k...


by Papicoolo m

Due to the action I really consider playing on coinpoker and I looked up the rake structure, which I have attached below. At 200 it should be 0,25bb cap for 5+ players. If the game is 5+ I‘m sure it‘s a great lineup. The other lines are HU and 3/4 max. Is this not accurate? I think 30% rakeback is standard at the site as well.Other sites/apps have 2-3bb cap and it d

The games that run on $100/200+ are all "Tonys table" which are raked 500-1000% of the regular tables. There is no problem with the rake across the regular tables. I was referencing the specific game.

Clearly the edge is higher at 2PLO than at 20k.

I want to make clear that I believe they can charge whatever rake they want, I just shared my opinion of the game as someone who played it and that while Kaki ran bad and lost a bunch, noone was likely theoretically winning.


Maybe I missed someone posting the link already, but just in case: new nosebleed Triton cash games with Linus and co streaming everyday this week for free on Youtube. Here is the first day, you can find the other games on the channel.


by Rahm93 m

The games that run on $100/200+ are all "Tonys table" which are raked 500-1000% of the regular tables. There is no problem with the rake across the regular tables. I was referencing the specific game. Clearly the edge is higher at 2PLO than at 20k.I want to make clear that I believe they can charge whatever rake they want, I just shared my opinion of the game as someone who pla

Thanks for the info, did not know that. 80bb rake is tough to beat. I hope Kaki has a good deal.
My post was also in no way meant to promote coinpoker.


Apologies for raw hh but the converter isnt working

Poker Hand #148445182: Omaha Pot Limit (100/200 ante 40) 2024/08/07 21:30:36 GMT
Table 'PLO ₮20,000 HU II' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: samjazzykins (89126.9 in chips)
Seat 2: omaha4rollz (223648 in chips)
omaha4rollz: posts the ante 40
samjazzykins: posts the ante 40
omaha4rollz: posts small blind 100
samjazzykins: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
omaha4rollz: raises 400 to 600
samjazzykins: raises 1200 to 1800
omaha4rollz: raises 3600 to 5400
samjazzykins: calls 3600
*** FLOP *** [3s 9h 5d]
samjazzykins: checks
omaha4rollz: bets 3583.8
samjazzykins: calls 3583.8
*** TURN *** [3s 9h 5d] [Qs]
samjazzykins: checks
omaha4rollz: bets 9013.8
samjazzykins: calls 9013.8
*** RIVER *** [3s 9h 5d Qs] [Qh]
samjazzykins: checks
omaha4rollz: bets 18027.6
samjazzykins: raises 71089.3 and is all-in
omaha4rollz has timed out
omaha4rollz activated time-bank (60 seconds)
omaha4rollz: calls 53061.7
*** SHOW DOWN ***
samjazzykins: shows [Tc Td 8d 7d] (two pairs, Queens and Tens)
omaha4rollz: shows [Kc 4s Ac Ah] (two pairs, Aces and Queens)
omaha4rollz collected 178234 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 178254 | CC 20
Board [ 3s 9h 5d Qs Qh ]
Game ended: 2024/08/07 21:31:55 GMT
Seat 1: samjazzykins (big blind) showed [Tc Td 8d 7d]
Seat 2: omaha4rollz (button) showed [Kc 4s Ac Ah] and won (178234) with two pairs, Aces and Queens
*** RNG ***
cards: (3s) (9h) (5d) (Qs) (Qh) As 4h 7h 8h 9c 6h 5c Qc 3c 7c 5h Ks 8s 9s 6c 4d Th 6d Jd 2c 7s 3h Ts Ad 4c 2d 8c Jc 2s Js Kh Qd Jh 3d 9d XX XX XX XX







Everyone talking that Stefan is an unorthodox genius poker player and now he said that he played bad all of these years and that the gto approach is the way to go kekeke

Is he bluffing ?


by Zamadhi m

July, Winners


July, Losers


Stefan down 65 buy-ins (pre-rakeback) at NL1k since his return


What kind of Ho mo Sapienses are these?


by 7845 m

Everyone talking that Stefan is an unorthodox genius poker player and now he said that he played bad all of these years and that the gto approach is the way to go kekeke

Is he bluffing ?

It’s strange, lately when he got back to playing first he posted that balanced GTO play is bad, now he seeks GTO nerds who could share some strategies with him, also he says all of these years he played bad but won millions?

Personally i believe his play is still on point despite late results just he loses big pots for whatever reason and plus rake can be a factor


stefan's rambling deserves its own thread imo


3 tables of $300/$600 going omaha4rollz vs GucciNike

CoinPoker, Omaha Pot Limit - §300/§600 (§120 ante) - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

omaha4rollz (SB): §193,209 (322 bb)
GucciNIKE (BB): §78,341.20 (131 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§1,140)
omaha4rollz (SB) raises to §1,800, GucciNIKE (BB) calls §1,200

Flop: (§3,840) J 9 3 (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) checks, omaha4rollz (SB) bets §2,850, GucciNIKE (BB) calls §2,850

Turn: (§9,540) 5 (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) checks, omaha4rollz (SB) bets §9,500, GucciNIKE (BB) raises to §38,000, omaha4rollz (SB) calls §28,500

River: (§85,540) 4 (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) bets §35,571.20 (all-in), omaha4rollz (SB) calls §35,571.20

Total pot: §156,682.40 (Rake: §40.40)

Showdown:
GucciNIKE (BB) shows J K J 6 (three of a kind, Jacks)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 67%, Flop: 93%, Turn: 98%, River: 100%)

omaha4rollz (SB) shows 3 3 6 T (three of a kind, Threes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 33%, Flop: 7%, Turn: 3%, River: 0%)

GucciNIKE (BB) wins §156,642


CoinPoker, Omaha Pot Limit - §300/§600 (§120 ante) - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

omaha4rollz (SB): §60,000 (100 bb)
GucciNIKE (BB): §350,052 (583 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§1,140)
omaha4rollz (SB) raises to §1,800, GucciNIKE (BB) calls §1,200

Flop: (§3,840) A 4 3 (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) checks, omaha4rollz (SB) bets §1,900, GucciNIKE (BB) calls §1,900

Turn: (§7,640) K (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) checks, omaha4rollz (SB) checks

River: (§7,640) K (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) checks, omaha4rollz (SB) bets §5,700, GucciNIKE (BB) raises to §24,700, omaha4rollz (SB) raises to §56,180 (all-in), GucciNIKE (BB) calls §31,480

Total pot: §120,000 (Rake: §40)

Showdown:
omaha4rollz (SB) shows J 5 4 K (a full house, Kings full of Fours)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 51%, Flop: 36%, Turn: 13%, River: 0%)

GucciNIKE (BB) shows K 9 2 A (a full house, Kings full of Aces)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 49%, Flop: 64%, Turn: 88%, River: 100%)

GucciNIKE (BB) wins §119,960


CoinPoker, Omaha Pot Limit - §300/§600 (§120 ante) - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

omaha4rollz (SB): §94,003 (157 bb)
GucciNIKE (BB): §255,149 (425 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§1,140)
omaha4rollz (SB) raises to §1,800, GucciNIKE (BB) 3-bets to §5,400, omaha4rollz (SB) calls §3,600

Flop: (§11,040) 2 7 6 (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) checks, omaha4rollz (SB) bets §7,800, GucciNIKE (BB) raises to §18,000, omaha4rollz (SB) raises to §65,000, GucciNIKE (BB) raises to §130,000, omaha4rollz (SB) calls §23,482.90

Turn: (§188,005.80) 3 (2 players, 0 all-in)

River: (§188,005.80) 4 (2 players, 0 all-in)

Total pot: §188,005.80 (Rake: §39.80)

Showdown:
GucciNIKE (BB) shows 7 9 7 9 (three of a kind, Sevens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 50%, Flop: 68%, Turn: 68%, River: 0%)

omaha4rollz (SB) shows 8 9 6 9 (a flush, Nine high)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 50%, Flop: 32%, Turn: 33%, River: 100%)

omaha4rollz (SB) wins §187,966


CoinPoker, Omaha Pot Limit - §300/§600 (§120 ante) - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

GucciNIKE (SB): §188,616 (314 bb)
omaha4rollz (BB): §160,336 (267 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§1,140)
GucciNIKE (SB) raises to §1,800, omaha4rollz (BB) 3-bets to §5,400, GucciNIKE (SB) calls §3,600

Flop: (§11,040) 2 4 8 (2 players)
omaha4rollz (BB) bets §3,630, GucciNIKE (SB) raises to §12,793.30, omaha4rollz (BB) calls §9,163.33

Turn: (§36,626.63) 3 (2 players)
omaha4rollz (BB) checks, GucciNIKE (SB) bets §24,391.10, omaha4rollz (BB) raises to §109,760, GucciNIKE (SB) raises to §170,303.10, omaha4rollz (BB) calls §32,262.60

River: (§320,671.86) J (2 players, 0 all-in)

Total pot: §320,671.86 (Rake: §39.86)

Showdown:
GucciNIKE (SB) shows T 5 4 8 (two pair, Eights and Fours)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 54%, Flop: 86%, Turn: 86%, River: 100%)

omaha4rollz (BB) shows 5 4 7 5 (a pair of Fives)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 46%, Flop: 14%, Turn: 14%, River: 0%)

GucciNIKE (SB) wins §320,632


CoinPoker, Omaha Pot Limit - §300/§600 (§120 ante) - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

omaha4rollz (SB): §66,760 (111 bb)
GucciNIKE (BB): §205,561 (343 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§1,140)
omaha4rollz (SB) raises to §1,800, GucciNIKE (BB) 3-bets to §5,400, omaha4rollz (SB) calls §3,600

Flop: (§11,040) 5 J 6 (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) bets §5,400, omaha4rollz (SB) calls §5,400

Turn: (§21,840) Q (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) bets §21,800, omaha4rollz (SB) raises to §55,840 (all-in), GucciNIKE (BB) calls §34,040

River: (§133,520) 7 (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: §133,520 (Rake: §40)

Showdown:
omaha4rollz (SB) shows Q K 4 5 (two pair, Queens and Fives)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 51%, Flop: 33%, Turn: 60%, River: 0%)

GucciNIKE (BB) shows 8 K J 9 (a straight, Five to Nine)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 49%, Flop: 67%, Turn: 40%, River: 100%)

GucciNIKE (BB) wins §133,480


CoinPoker, Omaha Pot Limit - §300/§600 (§120 ante) - 2 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

omaha4rollz (SB): §107,212 (179 bb)
GucciNIKE (BB): §105,537 (176 bb)

Pre-Flop: (§1,140)
omaha4rollz (SB) raises to §1,800, GucciNIKE (BB) 3-bets to §5,400, omaha4rollz (SB) calls §3,600

Flop: (§11,040) 2 T T (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) bets §2,400, omaha4rollz (SB) raises to §9,600, GucciNIKE (BB) raises to §19,200, omaha4rollz (SB) calls §9,600

Turn: (§49,440) K (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) bets §14,820, omaha4rollz (SB) calls §14,820

River: (§79,080) J (2 players)
GucciNIKE (BB) checks, omaha4rollz (SB) bets §67,672 (all-in), GucciNIKE (BB) calls §65,997.40

Total pot: §211,074.80 (Rake: §39.80)

Showdown:
omaha4rollz (SB) shows 4 6 2 K (two pair, Kings and Tens)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 41%, Flop: 22%, Turn: 23%, River: 0%)

GucciNIKE (BB) shows A 7 Q T (a straight, Ten to Ace)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 59%, Flop: 78%, Turn: 78%, River: 100%)

GucciNIKE (BB) wins §211,035


by rachit12 m

stefan's rambling deserves its own thread imo



by Parasense m

By your logic, a NL2 grinder with +15bb/100 could move up to NL200 and still win 15bb/100... Or same from 200 to 20k...

Agree with this logic.

Reply...