Is this true about higher stakes games 2/4 plus?
Or at $1/$2 as well somewhat I noticed after playing plo$50 and plo$100 that somewhat at $1/$2 but def. At $2/$4 I feel like the game plays more "true," or "pure..." as in mostly if you bet the players will fold more hands rather than call at lower stakes with less of a holding.
That being said I'm sure it gets harder and deep analytically... (of course) but it seemed to me that if you have a solid grasp fundamentally strategy wise than it's actually easier to read opponents as their range isn't as wide.
Does this make sense?
3 Replies
Or at $1/$2 as well somewhat I noticed after playing plo$50 and plo$100 that somewhat at $1/$2 but def. At $2/$4 I feel like the game plays more "true," or "pure..." as in mostly if you bet the players will fold more hands rather than call at lower stakes with less of a holding. That being said I'm sure it gets harder and deep analytically... (of course) but it seemed to me th
It sounds like it makes sense, but it fails the reality test. Better players are harder to read. While worse players will play a wider range of hands, that doesn't necessarily make them hard to read, because they don't balance very well.
Thanks man.. that makes alot of sense..(registered in my brain, good) lol.
Ty.
I 100% agree. I get crushed by idiots playing .25/.50 and .50/$1 online but usually win vs. the guys playing $1/$2 and bigger.
That said, they let people buy in for $20 at the .25/.50 and .50/$1 games, so they just gamble it up. I've never had so many one to four outers hit against me. It's sickening. They'll gii on flop or turn w/ almost any draw, bottom two, etc.
It doesn't happen at the $1/$2 or bigger. I really do think they play better, so if you are playing well you should do well. That said, you need to know what you are doing 😉 If you suck at PLO, you will still get crushed!
