Omaha player categories and player notes
So I am thinking that I need to re-vamp my player category system.
I have 5 categories at the moment. My categories are
1. Most players I just label as bad players
2. I have a few players a good players, usually these players are TAG (tight and aggressive)
3. Aggro players - these players 3 bet more often than GTO says they should and will barrel more often
4. I have players that do something questionable - but no category yet
5. I have loose/passive players - they limp high VPIP and when they raise, they usually have it
6. I have a category for players that I have live notes on in the WSOP+ app or that I meet at events (I usually put what they do for work or if there is some other interest fact that they mention) - not strategy usually, just so that I have some context if I meet them again and chat with them.
What categories do you have for Omaha? I am also trying to specify what format I take the note in PLO5/PLO4 or NLH tournaments
I feel like I should have more categories/more detail
2 Replies
Tight players are more or less nitty, or more or less good.
Loose players are up to very loose, or just loose.
Aggressive players (including loose ones) are more or less aggressive post flop too, or then not, really.
That would take three colors, where all have also a darker/lighter one.
Most important might be to mark the nits and the bad/loose players.
I've been thinking about this recently and preflop tendencies are easily visible, so it might be more useful to label according to river tendencies.
