live ~ we never bluff catching this board?
live ~ we never bluff catching this board?

live ~ we never bluff catching this board?

2/2 ~ no bring in 7 handed timed rakw

Villain is a huge aggrofish, who overvalues hands.

V has jammed light on flop a few times, he down a few buyins. He's raise jamming t882ss on aj9ss 3bet mwp. raise Jamming 3x on 338 mwp.
We stacked him once, didn't see his all his cards but they were bad.

Effective 220 vs Villain. 700 vs others.

Another aggrofish opens to 5 in utg
V in +1 flats(super wide)
Hero picks up K789ds 3bets to 20 in co.
sb calls
Utg calls
V call.

4way pot 80
Flop K73(not our suits).
We cbet 50
V flats(150 behind) ~ so he doesn't have combodraws, no sets, no K7/K3.

Hu pot 180
Turn 4
xx

River 4
V bets 80(70 behind)
Hero?

06 February 2026 at 08:08 PM
Reply...

11 Replies



I would fold. Would you agree that he has mostly flushes, and that he is mostly not bet-folding them at this depth?

Thus he is creating a spot where you cannot bluff really but your strong hands will always get value.


For what he has left, I probably just bet the turn. As played, I can go call or fold, but since beyond the flush a random 4 (including K4/74/43) also got there, fold is fine.


by Javanewt m

For what he has left, I probably just bet the turn. As played, I can go call or fold, but since beyond the flush a random 4 (including K4/74/43) also got there, fold is fine.

how much we betting on turn? bet small like 40?


Betting turn is just pointless and bad. Even checking and calling any river is an improved version as then you can sometimes win when money goes in.


V is huge aggrofish who played the hand extremely passively. I suppose he could have naked As occasionally.

Anyone else not like the pf raise? I wouldn’t be surprised if H’s equity was under 30%.


I would always 3bet this hand. Of course getting multiway action is not great, but I can guarantee Hero will win more than his fair share even here. And it's very easy to call a 4bet with this hand.


by amok m

Betting turn is just pointless and bad. Even checking and calling any river is an improved version as then you can sometimes win when money goes in.

... so he doesn't have combodraws, no sets, no K7/K3. This is why I bet the turn.


by Javanewt m

... so he doesn't have combodraws, no sets, no K7/K3. This is why I bet the turn.

I don't know what kind of read is that or what does it even mean. Does it mean villain never has a flush?

If villain never has the mentioned hands nor a flush, are you putting villain on exactly one pair? Does that necessarily make betting better than checking?


I think he can have some naked 456 without spades on the turn. Or some naked spades without a straight draw.

In game I was like giving up after seeing the turn.
But the river pairs and he still bets, it got me wondering does straights/flushes bet this river.

Oh, I remembered a hand, it was like a small pot but multiway, he bet for pot(20) on river on a bdflush with only a straight, he folded to our river raise(80).
Since he could fold straight on a flush river, can he also fold st8s/flushes to a jam on paired river??


by amok m
by Javanewt m

... so he doesn't have combodraws, no sets, no K7/K3. This is why I bet the turn.

I don't know what kind of read is that or what does it even mean.

It was from the OP.


Yes I know, but I am wondering what exactly does the no combodraw part mean. It sounds like for Javanewt it means villain didn't have a draw.

I am under the impression that villain will still have a lot of flushes/straights on the turn, making betting two pair borderline ridiculous.

Reply...