3BP OOP as PFA - Cbetting flop - PLO Mastermind Framework vs Classic Output
3BP OOP as PFA - Cbetting flop - PLO Mastermind Framework vs Classic Output

3BP OOP as PFA - Cbetting flop - PLO Mastermind Framework vs Classic Output

Hey all,

I'm trying to simplify the 3BP OOP as PFA strategy - Cbetting flop - 100bb

PLO Mastermind has to solutions: Classic and Framework

When the texture is Unpaired Two-Tone, classic solution let you choose B50 and POT, and framework B67 for most bertain boards

However, I've studied in the past that boards like KT7 two-tone, you might want to split your range:

B33 o B50: Bet/Fold hands that want to extract value from weaker portion of villain's calling range & also very strong invulnerable hands (or traps)

POT: Bet/Call hands that benefit from 2 street game and Deny EQ, or benefit a lot from Fold EQ.

So, how does it work when we simplify to B67? we're not supposed to loose a lot of EV by simplifying to 1 sizing, but does it really make sense?

03 April 2026 at 07:45 PM
Reply...

2 Replies



lose*

Of course it makes sense to simplify. What doesn't make sense is asking such questions here.


simplifying on flop and turn is ideal for ease of execution

rivers are where we generally have split sizings

i studied before the simplification but if you are introduced after then just study single sizings

Reply...