Set over Set
Just variance or bad play?
PokerStars - $0.05 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BTN: 100.8 BB
SB: 100 BB
Hero (BB): 177 BB
UTG: 100 BB
MP: 855.8 BB
CO: 346.4 BB
SB posts SB 0.4 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has J♠ J♦
fold, MP raises to 2.4 BB, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 7.6 BB, MP raises to 20 BB, Hero calls 12.4 BB
Flop: (40.4 BB, 2 players) J♣ Q♠ A♠
Hero checks, MP bets 13.6 BB, Hero raises to 72 BB, MP raises to 835.8 BB and is all-in, Hero calls 85 BB and is all-in
Turn: (354.4 BB, 2 players) 9♠
River: (354.4 BB, 2 players) 3♥
Hero shows J♠ J♦ (Three of a Kind, Jacks)
(Pre 18%, Flop 10%, Turn 23%)
MP shows Q♦ Q♣ (Three of a Kind, Queens)
(Pre 82%, Flop 90%, Turn 77%)
MP wins 339.6 BB
4 Replies
3bet should be way bigger pre imo. Check raise sizing is also huge and basically forces you to call the jam.
You're trying to stack off against an incredibly strong range here when you raise this big on the flop. I would guess the raise should be half the size if you want to play it this way.
You're trying to stack off against an incredibly strong range here when you raise this big on the flop. I would guess the raise should be half the size if you want to play it this way.
In short, in this spot, was my set not strong enough to want to play for stacks?
What if the effective stack was 100BB?
In short, in this spot, was my set not strong enough to want to play for stacks?
What if the effective stack was 100BB?
You're just going to stack off against AA, QQ, and KTs when you raise this big, so I would guess no it isn't.
No idea about 100BB because the hand wouldn't play out this way.
