96s BB v SB
PokerStars - $0.25 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BTN: 116.52 BB
SB: 103.2 BB
Hero (BB): 100 BB
UTG: 234.08 BB
MP: 98.92 BB
CO: 113.76 BB
SB posts SB 0.4 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has 9♣ 6♣
fold, fold, fold, fold, SB raises to 3 BB, Hero calls 2 BB
Flop: (6 BB, 2 players) T♠ 7♣ 2♦
SB bets 2.96 BB, Hero raises to 10.64 BB, SB calls 7.68 BB
Turn: (27.28 BB, 2 players) 8♠
SB checks, Hero bets 22 BB, SB calls 22 BB
River: (71.28 BB, 2 players) T♣
SB checks
Maybe we never raise flop?
River? Does all his 1 pair Tx fold turn?
6 Replies
Interesting, at first sight I was thinking "easy all in" but actually it's hard to see what you get value from besides JT and T9. Mayhe they could not give up AT, KT or QT on the turn though. In my pool against an unknown I would assume they have still a lot of T's and that would be a good shove. On PS 25z I would imagine the population plays better?
Maybe we never raise flop?
^ is this crossing your mind on any other unpaired river? I liked the flop raise personally...but not doing it often
He shouldn't be folding too much Tx OTT imo
Raising the flop with a gutshot is fine, but I would prefer non-dominated gutshots J9-J8 for this, and use weaker gutshots for calling.
I think SB continues with his TPGK on the turn.
Shove on the river.
We probably raise more polar otf so this hand doesn't make the cut, unless we are trying to exploit a villain who over cbets.
Surely you aren't thinking about checking otr? We should jam with our boats and can size down appropriately with the rest of our value range.
Tl;dr raise flop because everyone over cbets and under defends and jam river because it's BvB
Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
Nope. I'm getting this stack in after a fake short pause to represent mild fear
Think flop is fine. Could maybe 3x. He's still mostly uncapped for OPs too
No, his 1 pair and Tx won't fold turn. For 100bbs, this is a pretty straight forward river shove. Sometimes you get crying calls from big pairs, and you'll get just about all Tx calling for this stack depth (or they should be).