[50NL] 2nd nut flush vs fish +200bb deep
[converted_hand][hand_history]iPoker - €0.50 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3
Hero (BTN): €123.54 (247.1 bb)
SB: €40.40 (80.8 bb)
BB: €127.62 (255.2 bb)
UTG: €62.36 (124.7 bb)
MP: €51.09 (102.2 bb)
CO: €53.96 (107.9 bb)
SB posts €0.25, BB posts €0.50
Pre Flop: (pot: €0.75) Hero has K♠ 7♠
3 folds, Hero raises to €1.50, fold, BB raises to €2.50, Hero calls €1.00
Flop: (€5.25, 2 players) 5♠ T♠ 8♣
BB bets €5.25, Hero calls €5.25
Turn: (€15.75, 2 players) 6♥
BB checks, Hero bets €15.75, BB calls €15.75
River: (€47.25, 2 players) 2♠
BB checks, Hero bets €47.25, BB raises to €104.12 and is all-in
[/hand_history][/converted_hand]
Fish is 60/20 on 25 hands
4 Replies
The ability of such a player to evaluate his own hand strength is minimal. He could have "trapped" you with AA on the river. Around 500 BB deep, I might start to worry.
Yeah the min3b pre, potting flop makes me think BB is spewy. Wouldn't fold any flush even though I hate facing river XR.
I dont like river size. If you bet smaller its more likely he will call one pairs hand flush will raise you anyway.
If you didn’t want to pile all of the money in, you probably shouldn’t have bet so big on every street. Folding the second nuts with those odds and no real reads (other than v being an obvious fish) is, imo, insane
If you ever want to reasonably b/f the river you’d have to bet smaller. But as was said, you might want to do that in general, since fish will just raise with pretty much any flush anyway and will have a lot of 1 pair to ball with. Not exactly sure how small, but i think 1/3 makes sense after an equity shifting river. Then they can raise non all in with worse too
