AA NL2 - Did I do anything wrong here?
PokerStars - $0.02 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BB: 141 BB
Hero (UTG): 169.5 BB
MP: 49 BB
CO: 58.5 BB
BTN: 101.5 BB
SB: 93.5 BB
SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB, CO posts penalty blind 1.5 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 3 BB) Hero has A♠ A♥
Hero raises to 4 BB, MP calls 4 BB, CO calls 3 BB, fold, fold, fold
Flop: (14 BB, 3 players) 9♦ 7♦ J♣
Hero bets 10 BB, MP calls 10 BB, fold
Turn: (34 BB, 2 players) 9♥
Hero bets 20 BB, MP raises to 35 BB and is all-in, Hero calls 15 BB
River: (104 BB, 2 players) 7♠
MP cashed out 92 BB for a fee of 2 BB
Hero shows A♠ A♥ (Two Pair, Aces and Nines)
(Pre 86%, Flop 78%, Turn 5%)
MP shows 9♠ Q♥ (Full House, Nines full of Sevens)
(Pre 14%, Flop 22%, Turn 95%)
8 Replies
It's a whatever hand.
SPR is 3.5 vs the shortstack. We want our OPs to get paid vs draws and Jx so don't mind how the money goes in ott.
Maybe a bit smaller sizing otf or even a check since it is multi-way? Even if that’s right, though, I can’t imagine your line is too big an error. Not much you can do after that.
Nope. With an SPR of 1 OTT, I probably just jam myself.
Yeah 4x pre is too big. You shouldn't raise pre based on your hand strength if that's what you're doing. If this is your standard size then it's too big. Postflop is fine I just jam turn though
well played in my opinion. If villain had 100bb stack I might fold unless I had better reads
I was about to say the same until I looked at the stacks on the table. Generally at a table of competent villains I would agree with you. You have mp flatting with Q9os with four to act behind. 4x-6x on a table like this is absolutely fine.
Smaller stacks is an argument for raising smaller, not bigger.
I wasn't really considering their stack sizes, more so the inelasticity of a fish's PF calling range. I understand your point.
