3bet pot, understanding solver

Dunno. Quick sim i just ran in gto+ doesn't fire any AJs, assuming SDV vs the remainder of SB's draws.

Though i like the way you played the hand. We probably can/should extend here otr.

Blocker effects, they are all close to ev so you won't make big mistake either way.

Yeah I wouldn't worry about stuff like this too much. GTO is incredibly sensitive, and the equilibrium can shift by the smallest of changes. If shoving the non hearts here loses -0.5bb, it always checks. On the other hand, if hearts wins 0.5bb by shoving, it always shoves.

Here in your case the margin of victory is hopefully much bigger than that. And I think that because villain needs to be defending a lot of their 8x and pretty much all Tx, your shove is making a nice chunk of money here. They won't be defending enough so WP.

Not saying it's a bad question, it may be beneficial to understand why, but it is not usefuly to start implementing minute stuff like this to your game.

Edit: did a few nodelocks:

At equilibrium, a balanced calling range would look like this. So calling almost all Tx and a looot of other stuff.

And did a few changes, still call a decent amount of 8x and most Tx, and we have villain overfolding by a big margin. Needless to say all hands with little to no showdownvalue are shoving river.

Ah, thanks! I often see the solver violating the "common wisdom" rule 'do not bluff with a missed FD' and I was wondering why, your explanation makes sense. Maybe not for all those instances, but in this case it seems logical.

yeah, personally in villain's shoes I'm having a hard time calling Tx nevermind, 8x, as I think most regs would at these stakes, and it's probably correct given pool tendencies. Also due to pool tendencies I think they're heavily weighted towards 1 pair hands in this line on that board as well innit, more than solver would be I think. I haven't gotten into nodelocking yet, on my to do list 😀