AJs from sb vs 3bet BB after limp Btn
€50.00 EUR NL Holdem -
Seat 8 is the button
Seat 8: Villain 8 ( €46.32 EUR ) - (VPIP: 96.67 / PFR: 40.0 / 3B: 20.0 / AF: 31)
Seat 10: Hero ( €50.00 EUR ) - (VPIP: 25.00 / PFR: 20.61 / 3B: 10.20 / AF: 373)
Seat 1: Villain 1 ( €78.44 EUR ) vpip28/ pfr 25 3bet 13 100 hands
Seat 3: Villain 3 ( €107.86 EUR )
Seat 6: Villain 6 ( €50.00 EUR )
Hero posts small blind [€0.25 EUR].
Villain 1 posts big blind [€0.50 EUR].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ As Js ]
Villain 3 folds
Villain 6 folds
Villain 8 calls [€0.50 EUR]
Hero raises [€2.50 EUR]
Villain 1 raises [€7.50 EUR]
Villain 8 folds
Hero raises [€50.00 EUR]
Villain 1 calls [€42.50 EUR]
Villain 1 wins €97.50 EUR
4 Replies
1- why the AF is so big
2- he has 20% of hands so AJs could 3-bet or flat
I would flat because if it went all-in there is no way to outplay them but if you call then you could maniplaute them into even more bad decisions on later streets ��
because I started the site for two days for this AF and so high because it is related to a few hands. I didn't understand your answer regarding the hand, the best solution and the flat at the 3bet?
If you went all-in, would you profit? Sure but if you flat the 3-bet you would get more money by tricking him on later streets
I prefer flatting the 3bet in position, especially with it being a smaller size. You can keep dominated hands in, steal some pots etc.
His 3bet stat is wide enough that you will get a decent amount of folds from the shove, though a 3bet range over an isolate is typically tighter than it would be normally.
