Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k

Biggest loser in online poker history wants to grind $16k

I start this with some pictures:

nl2 -$8792.18 -82 buy ins below EV


nl5 (notice that pt4 shows party poker nl5 as nl4) -$5943.81


nl10 -$773.92 -15 buy ins below EV


Total loss -$15509.91


This is me playing nl2, nl5 and nl10 on party poker for one year.

My history begins somewhere in same period when they started to show WSOP shows in television. I think I have played 12-13 years nows mainly NL2, some amount of NL5 and little bit of NL10 what is the biggest stake i've ever played.

I've read all Sklansky, all Harrington, all Miller, watched huge amount of videos, bought trackers and calculators.

Still after those years and after that all I've lost huge amount of money on those stakes. I try to play my best but losing to huge suckouts like 95/5 favorite makes me really upset.

I've lost literally all my money including all my life savings to online poker. I want to try one last time to win those money back and little bit of extra. That's why $16k. What I need is support and guiding.

I had thread on micro forum but they deleted it just when people start to understand that this is real situation and not fake.

And if you wonder where that biggest loser comes from it was said by guy who has been playing for living many years. He said I'm the biggest loser in history counted as lost buy ins.

) 33 Views 33
18 March 2019 at 01:30 PM
Reply...

784 Replies

5
w


2024 YEAR IN NUMBERS

The year has come to an end and it's time to reveal the losses of the year. Cash games remained my primary format last year as well. I barely felt like playing tournaments. Spending hours grinding only to bust just before the money because some whale sucks out just doesn't motivate me.

In cash games I ended up 22 buy ins below EV. That's an absolutely insane figure especially considering I was playing against the worst opponents the internet has to offer. The biggest battle of the year was against the rigged rng. Add to this a large number of lost coin flips and absolutely sick hands where the outcome always favored the whale and you can see the result in the graph.

Of course there were some bright spots like the first profitable month in my history. That happened because in that particular month there were only a few suckouts and my strong hands held up more often. The fact that other months were a nothing but suckouts and favoritism toward bad players clearly shows the nature of these games.

One of the highlights of the year was also my battle with Eastyy. Well known personality from streams and YouTube who was doing his $1,000 challenge in nl10 games and I participated in many of his sessions. Everything culminated toward the end of the challenge, and Eastyy and his audience were convinced the challenge would be decided against me. However I played exceptionally well against him and he ended up making some really poor calls against me. Overall these were fun encounters and even positively impacted the number of followers for this topic. I couldn't be happier that this topic has become one of the most popular of all time on this legendary poker site.

The goal for this year is to achieve more profitable months. Maybe I add little bit more tournaments also to playing calendar but main format is still cash games.

Cash -$8099.93 (22 buy ins below ev)
Tournaments -$319.90

Total -$8419.83




I mean you have to respect the dude posting a graph for all his haters. A real genuine guy, hope you run better in 2025.


impressive gl in 2025 paisting


Paisting,

Your EV line is what you deserved to win.

That is what EV means.

Your EV based on the probabilities around the hands you played and how well you got it in was -$7878.99

If you ran at EV, meaning if you won exactly how much you deserved to win in 2024, you'd have lost $7878.99

Is there a part of this that you would like clarified further?


by Snowstorm k

Paisting,

Your EV line is what you deserved to win.

That is what EV means.

Your EV based on the probabilities around the hands you played and how well you got it in was -$7878.99

If you ran at EV, meaning if you won exactly how much you deserved to win in 2024, you'd have lost $7878.99

Is there a part of this that you would like clarified further?

EV line shows only clear suckouts. 22 buy ins is massive amount. Don't deny it. Also remember I have clear details from 2 different software engineers how rigged rng works. EV line won't example show the time I have KK and whale has AA. Rigged rng gives enormous amount of those confronts that favour whales. And there lot's of another bigger and minor things that puts site favoured player in 60% equity winner where he in real environment is clear underdog.


by Paisting k

EV line shows only clear suckouts. 22 buy ins is massive amount. Don't deny it. Also remember I have clear details from 2 different software engineers how rigged rng works. EV line won't example show the time I have KK and whale has AA. Rigged rng gives enormous amount of those confronts that favour whales. And there lot's of another bigger and minor things that puts site favoured player in 60% equity winner where he in real environment is clear underdog.

So it is logical then for you to continue to play then. Great plan, Happy New Year and GL. If you did what logic says you should have done you would be +$8k for 2024 but what the hell who needs money when you can pay $8k to go whale hunting.


by Paisting k

EV line shows only clear suckouts. 22 buy ins is massive amount. Don't deny it. Also remember I have clear details from 2 different software engineers how rigged rng works. EV line won't example show the time I have KK and whale has AA. Rigged rng gives enormous amount of those confronts that favour whales. And there lot's of another bigger and minor things that puts site favoured player in 60% equity winner where he in real environment is clear underdog.

22 buyins under ev over 117,000 hands is not a massive amount.

You obviously don't understand what an EV line is or what it means.

I just did some quick math and your EV (the amount you deserve to win if you run exactly as the numbers say you should) since starting this thread in 2019 is about -$48,500. . At micro cash.

And by the way, your one winning month in 20 years of playing, your EV was -$106 meaning at nl10 you ran 24buyins above ev since you won $121.

You had to run like GOD for that one winning month.

So if you can say that 22 buyins under ev in 117,000 hands is "insane", then surely you can also agree that 24 buyins ABOVE EV over 17,000 hands you played that month is also insane, right?


Lol


So nice to see that you still wine and dine all those players ten years and counting. Imagine being that stupid that you believe games are rigged don't understand what running bad or ev means and still keep playing. You truly are the biggest idiot in the history of online poker.


As soon, as you mentioned partypoker, I 100% believed you.


by Paisting k

22 buy ins is massive amount.

It's not.


by Paisting k

EV line shows only clear suckouts. 22 buy ins is massive amount. Don't deny it. Also remember I have clear details from 2 different software engineers how rigged rng works. EV line won't example show the time I have KK and whale has AA. Rigged rng gives enormous amount of those confronts that favour whales. And there lot's of another bigger and minor things that puts site favoured player in 60% equity winner where he in real environment is clear underdog.

If you have had 2 separate software engineers explain to you about the rng being rigged, why play at all?

You know it's rigged, they've told you it's rigged. Surely the logical decision is to stop putting money into the rigged machine?


Paisting why do you focus more on the 22 buyins below EV rather than the other 850 buyins that you lost? One of those is actually fixable if you cared about getting better.


https://twoplustwo.com/post?postId=58844... here is another dude beating the games the biggest idiot on the history of online poker can't.


If you somehow hadn't played poker last year, what would you have spent the €8,419.83 on?


Post 2024 red line


Yes...bring the Red Line on!!!I bet it is ****ing superb horizontal!!

Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk


Paisting, don't listen to the haters, keep grinding and good things will happen in 2025.


by IJustClick k

Post 2024 red line

by disident k

Yes...bring the Red Line on!!!I bet it is ****ing superb horizontal!!


This is what total punishment looks like. Whale bet small and I bet big. They are also folding to river bluffs absurd high amount on 888, never seen anything like that on any other site. Bet bet shove and call call shove are massive hammers against those whales on river. But works only on 888.


by Paisting k

This is what total punishment looks like. Whale bet small and I bet big. They are also folding to river bluffs absurd high amount on 888, never seen anything like that on any other site. Bet bet shove and call call shove are massive hammers against those whales on river. But works only on 888.

Why is 888 rigged like this and all other sites rigged in a different way? Are the people that run the universe doing experiments? Maybe you could ask them next time you exchange emails. Am also curious if the people that control the rigging are able to win at the lowest possible stakes or if they're not beatable by ANYONE?


by Paisting k

This is what total punishment looks like. Whale bet small and I bet big. They are also folding to river bluffs absurd high amount on 888, never seen anything like that on any other site. Bet bet shove and call call shove are massive hammers against those whales on river. But works only on 888.

Crushing! How much would you charge for specific red line coaching? ($/h)


by IJustClick k

Crushing! How much would you charge for specific red line coaching? ($/h)

Paistings strategy is very red-liny by nature. Always get your money in the middle (by calling or betting/raising) and red-line can only go up. This comes with the added benefit of you punishing all the whales.


by Paisting k

This is what total punishment looks like. Whale bet small and I bet big. They are also folding to river bluffs absurd high amount on 888, never seen anything like that on any other site. Bet bet shove and call call shove are massive hammers against those whales on river. But works only on 888.

Do you really not get that your red line looks like that simply because you never fold? Look at your ev and profit lines and see how much money your strategies have made you.

You've lost 239/240 months in the past 20 years and think that one month where you didn't go straight down the whole time means you were doing everything right all along?

Am I understanding that correctly?


by Snowstorm k

Do you really not get

Do you really get what is total exploit and running over or are just like these nl2 2 weeks challenge and never again heard guys "I need to learn gto"?

If whale is folding 9 times of 10 to river shove after I call call shove or bet bet shove do you think he is gto or exploitable? Now think if the same whales are betting 25% on massive draw heavy board is it good play or is it just burning money?

They don't play gto they are just larping something they really don't understand. If they are playing gto that need to call those rivers like hell. And when they are not they won't bet AA on T92 suited board 25%. It's just logical thinking and basic Theory Of Poker by Skalansky. My all red line is coming from these spots. They bet small and I bet big. The only way they beat me is to suck out. If they are not that are broke in 15 minutes.


by heat555 k

It's not.

Did you say that when I has revealed nl2 hoaxers that said thet beat stake when they have 12 buy ins winnings? What roll you think is good to "beat" those stakes if 22 buy is is normal to run under ev? I ask from you because you are stupid denialist. You can look down this topic, there is year where I was 122 buy ins below ev. You are still denying it after I have revealed eCogra is not checking that rng they admitted that to me clearly like I said earlier and Gambling Commission said that too as I have told here earlier. So what are you talking about?

Reply...