DriveHUD - Poker HUD & Database Software [-10% Discount]
[URL="http://drivehud.com/?t=22cs"]
[/URL]
- Track all poker hands you play online.
- Run a HUD overlay on all of your opponents as you play.
- Re-play every session, and every hand you ever played.
- Graph and analyze how unlucky or lucky you’ve been running.
- Filter for any situation you can think of and analyze it.
- Player profile your opponents with ease so you know who the fish or sharks are.
- Provide and easy and intuitive poker database experience.
[UR
Hey anyone know the difference between stab , bet vs missed and float stats ?
I want the stat that i am the PFR OOP , i DONT CBET the flop , and the villain IP bet vs my missed cbet ...
Thanks
Is there a way to filter for all the spots your opponent bet full pot on any street so I can review only those hands?
Are the prices displayed for the Baller packages to be paid yearly, or is there also a "cheaper" renewal price as of year 2 (as is the case for the basic packages)?
For example: does the "Small Stakes HOLDEM Package" cost 85,99$ every year?
Hi! I have got lot of hands what I tracked with hand2note4 on coinpoker can I import this to drive2hud? And I can import coinpoker( tracked hand2note4) Alias players hand too? And I can use drive2hud with my old hands in coinpoker? And the I can import this handhistory what the coinpoker support sent me? Thanks for the reply
Adding my question from our PM here, maybe the answer will be useful for others as well playing on GGpoker.
The new update added "Rake $" and "Rake Allocated $" - for example 232$ Rake and 315$ allocated. As of now, I manually calculate the rake by taking my winnings from PokerCraft and reducing it by the NetWon from DriveHUD2, the number coming out from that is slighty below the "Rake Allocated $".
For GGpoker, does "Rake Allocated $" include bad beat jackpot rake as well?
Just wondering which ra
in DH rake includes jackpot fee also
in DH rake is (total pot - sum of all winnings)
Rake $ - is contributed rake
Rake Allocated $ - is how much you paid when you won pot
Are the prices displayed for the Baller packages to be paid yearly, or is there also a "cheaper" renewal price as of year 2 (as is the case for the basic packages)?
For example: does the "Small Stakes HOLDEM Package" cost 85,99$ every year?
No, those packages renew at the DH2 + xray price. The one you're talking about I believe is ~$30-33/yr.
Thanks!
Also, are there some lines that are considered highly overbluffed or underbluffed by the general population? For example bet/check bet, c/rturn bet river etc?
This data is kind of stake dependent. You can use both the range reports to analyze this better and see where opportunities arise for your stakes and site.
in DH rake includes jackpot fee also
in DH rake is (total pot - sum of all winnings)
Rake $ - is contributed rake
Rake Allocated $ - is how much you paid when you won pot
Thanks, now i had a case where "Rake $" is higher, so still not sure which metric to use to make sure it includes all the rake paid.
Also, a question on the HUD. Every time i open a new table, it forgets the layout that I have previously saved and I have to put individual player HUDs into the correct position on each new table. Also, in order to activate my own HUD, on each table I have to manually click on "Treat as 6max" - is there any way to have the system automatically apply my HUD without doing these extra steps for each new table? It is pretty time consuming sadly.
Thanks
Thanks, now i had a case where "Rake $" is higher, so still not sure which metric to use to make sure it includes all the rake paid.
Also, a question on the HUD. Every time i open a new table, it forgets the layout that I have previously saved and I have to put individual player HUDs into the correct position on each new table. Also, in order to activate my own HUD, on each table I have to manually click on "Treat as 6max" - is there any way to have the system automatically apply my HUD without d
Rake $ might be higher that rake allocated if you lose often but put a lot of money into the pot.
As far as the HUD, you probably checked apply to specific table option in HUD settings. You can check that in the HUD tab, or send an advanced log and we can check your settings.
Thanks, actually I did not have that setting with the HUD settings activated, I only used "Save HUD position" after positioning my HUD. Sadly with that option the problem still occurs, I have to manually redrag all the parts.
Another problem is that I always have to click on "Treat as 6max", because when i created my HUD, i did not know yet that Winamax is using 5max tables. I tried to export and import into a 5max new HUD, but then it switches back to 5max. What is the best way to transfer my 6max HUD into a 5max so I do not have to click on "Treat as 6max" each time?
Thanks!
Thanks, actually I did not have that setting with the HUD settings activated, I only used "Save HUD position" after positioning my HUD. Sadly with that option the problem still occurs, I have to manually redrag all the parts.
Another problem is that I always have to click on "Treat as 6max", because when i created my HUD, i did not know yet that Winamax is using 5max tables. I tried to export and import into a 5max new HUD, but then it switches back to 5max. What is the best way to transfer my 6m
Send a log from the support icon then, and click to send advanced log. I can continue to guess what your issue is, but it's easier if we can see the hud and logs.
As far as 5max, did you use the duplicate option in the HUD tab. Just duplicate your 6max HUD to 5max?
Thanks, the duplicate option worked. Now i have my HUD under the 5max section as well.
But for each new table I open, I still have to manually click on "Load HUD" and then reposition each player HUD for each new table despite using the "save HUD position" option.
I just sent the log over, cheers!
It appears river call efficiency stat is calculated differently in DH2 compared to PT4. Can you confirm?
Thanks, the duplicate option worked. Now i have my HUD under the 5max section as well.
But for each new table I open, I still have to manually click on "Load HUD" and then reposition each player HUD for each new table despite using the "save HUD position" option.
I just sent the log over, cheers!
Did you try opening just one table, position, save, and then see if it loads? What site was this again? I'll check in to your log. It's most likely a HUD setting that isn't correct.
It appears river call efficiency stat is calculated differently in DH2 compared to PT4. Can you confirm?
Yes, as far as I'm aware, rake was included in the river call eff stat. I'm not 100% sure why, and it's something I brought up w/ the dev team today, so I think they are removing it, based on what I looked at.
Did you try opening just one table, position, save, and then see if it loads? What site was this again? I'll check in to your log. It's most likely a HUD setting that isn't correct.
Yes thats what I did, open table - position the 5 HUDs correctly, click on the save hud position button and then I opened a new table.
DriveHUD 2 Beta Update - v2.0.17.12774
https://drivehud.com/poker-hud/DriveHUD2...
Added restraddle support for Adda52
Added the ability to the hand tag editor to choose when the last hand or last 3 hands will be tagged using hotkeys
Added IsFirstRaiseAllIn term to custom stats language
Fixed an issue where Holdem 6+ positions were incorrect for some sites (rebuild is required)
Fixed Rake BBs stat
Fixed River Call Efficiency stat
Fixed an issue where W$SD stat would not trigger in some specific cases (rebuild is required)
Fixed an issue where ClubGG would crash if it was installed in a location other than the default
Fixed UI issues in the hand viewer
Fixed UI issues in the replayer
Fixed minor UI issues
Fixed incorrect stats in default built-in popups (new installations only)
Fixed an issue where PPPoker hands would not be imported if PPPoker client disconnected
Yes, as far as I'm aware, rake was included in the river call eff stat. I'm not 100% sure why, and it's something I brought up w/ the dev team today, so I think they are removing it, based on what I looked at.
Having rake counting in it should be okay, it would still be very different and that isn't goign to be the cause for such a large difference in values. It's calculated wrong in HEM also...