Flop cbet exploit vs exploiting overprobed turns

Hi everyone!

I have a question for you solver nerds. We all know SRP OOP generally under defends against flop cbets, and I believe the smaller the cbet, the larger the relative under defense. Therefore I for an example have built my strat on ditching B33 for B25.

However, most pools also over probe turn when IP check backs. So we're often in a situation, where we have to decide on whether we gain more EV from cbetting more with low EQ, or over calling/bombing vs the turn over probe with a strengthened flop check back range. Or both.

Can we for an example use Wizard AI to research the thresholds we want to find? I know pio can to some extent, but it's not that easy because of so many turn parameters. I believe Wizard AI doesn't allow us to lock frequencies on all turns, just particular ones, which has little effect on our flop overall strategy regardless of what we node lock on the turn.

I might be using these tools incorrectly or maybe I've missed something, but please free feel to comment and help me out 😀

Thanks in advance!