Vice-President Kamala Harris
Probably requires her own thread at this moment, lock/delete etc if someone else wins the nom
Remind me about "god" character, it's been a fair few acts since he was last on stage. Where does he live and what does he do? Where does he fit into the arc of the main plot? And most importantly, how can we be sure he's not Chinese?
You have to piece it together by visiting multiple threads, but he gives a ton of info in the Ukraine thread. Trump, North Korea and Russia are on a team to save America from the global empire. Kind of shocking to learn that the evil global empire consists of Dems, China, and Ukraine. Yes, N Korea and Russia vs China.
He lied. If it wasn’t the right clip why didn’t he say so at the time? He said that he knew instantly it was the wrong clip, so he should have apologized in real time. Kamala pointed out to him that the clip was wrong and he tried to argue against her, remember?
He did say
Speaking a day later, Baier said that when he asked his staff for video to play during the interview, he was expecting to get two clips — one that showed Trump making the “enemy within” comment to Fox's Maria Bartiromo, and the one from Faulkner's town hall that was played during the Harris interview.
You could still be right and he knew it but was unwilling to admit it at the moment. Still has CBS or 60 minutes apologized ?
I call a spade a spade. Anyone who's trying to destroy a country (not her, but her controllers, since she probably has no clue what's going on just like her boss) that's called a camel is doing her a favor. There are other words I would prefer but my mother taught me to always use good mannors.
Well I’m calling reality, reality .
Where is that USA ending that biden and the deep state were suppose to accomplish ?
That was trump prediction and probably one of yours right ?
Now it’s Kamala ?
What prediction did u ever got right ?
He did say
You could still be right and he knew it but was unwilling to admit it at the moment. Still has CBS or 60 minutes apologized ?
I’m saying the way he reacted isn’t consistent with the wrong clip being played.
Why would CBS apologize again? They edited an interview. Every interview ever is edited. By the way, I still think this is all stupid because the original answer was better than the edited version in my opinion.
Are we going to require that every interview from now on be unedited? That seems really dumb.
What’s more noteworthy about the story is that Trump demanded CBS have their broadcasting rights stripped. That is way more dangerous than this faux outrage campaign.
I watched a short of Kamala where she really answers her own question as to why Trump is now a favourite to win the election.
She talks about working at McDonald's as a student, but mentions that some people are trying to raise a family on that and her facial expression tells you that it's not really possible.
And that's the issue. If you aren't that smart, but if you are willing to work hard, 40 hours a week at McDonald's you can't afford to raise a family.
So the economy isn't strong. It's a weak bubble. That's why Trump is now favourite to win the election.
I watched a short of Kamala where she really answers her own question as to why Trump is now a favourite to win the election.
She talks about working at McDonald's as a student, but mentions that some people are trying to raise a family on that and her facial expression tells you that it's not really possible.
And that's the issue. If you aren't that smart, but if you are willing to work hard, 40 hours a week at McDonald's you can't afford to raise a family.
So the economy isn't strong. It's a weak
why would we ever want someone to be able to support a family by themselves on a mcdonalds or walmart salary? I never understood why this was a goal of the left.
why would we ever want someone to be able to support a family by themselves on a mcdonalds or walmart salary? I never understood why this was a goal of the left.
More importantly, was there ever time when it was actually feasible ?
Seem it’s barking at wrong tree , especially when no tips are allowed in McDonald (unless it changed , didn’t been there like at least 10 years..)
More importantly, was there ever time when it was actually feasible ?
Seem it’s barking at wrong tree , especially when no tips are allowed in McDonald (unless it changed , didn’t been there like at least 10 years..)
Probably not.
Maybe the only argument for it is if someone is working at mcdonalds or walmart and simultaneously receiving welfare. But then again, someone could still probably work part-time at walmart for 15 an hour and still qualify for welfare. Then we also get into whether having government supplement income with welfare is more desirable than costs of consumer goods going up (if they do, it’s controversial that this always happens) when pay increases… and we could probably go on and on about the different pros and cons of different policies.
Instead we all get this really flattened discussion of “well if people can’t support themselves from these billionaire fast food corporations this is literally class warfare against the working class!” or some other populist brainrot.
Yeah but the point is if you aren't a hot shot lawyer, a senator, an IT professional etc ie maybe you have a 100 IQ and it's not you're fault, but you are willing to work hard, you should be able to raise a family easily working a 40 hour week at McDonald's or Walmart.
But, that's what Kamala, Barack Obama, Taylor Swift, Robert DeNiro, Jimmy Kimmel etc ... they don't understand that. They think the economy is great and they are all scratching their heads wondering how in the world Trump is winning, when in reality if you aren't one of those privileged people you know the economy stinks.
I don’t see Dems saying the economy is great. Trump said it a ton in 2019 but millions in min wage jobs were struggling and homelessness was still rampant.
Yeah but the point is if you aren't a hot shot lawyer, a senator, an IT professional etc ie maybe you have a 100 IQ and it's not you're fault, but you are willing to work hard, you should be able to raise a family easily working a 40 hour week at McDonald's or Walmart.
But, that's what Kamala, Barack Obama, Taylor Swift, Robert DeNiro, Jimmy Kimmel etc ... they don't understand that. They think the economy is great and they are all scratching their heads wondering how in the world Trump is winnin
This is just not true at all, you can go into the trades, join a union job, get a skill degree like nursing, cosmotology, dental assistant, go into banking or customer service, work in a service job, work in a government job that doesn’t require a degree, go into the military, work in security…
There are absolutely jobs where you either need a minimal or no education whatsoever.
Working at mcdonalds was supposed to be a starter job for highschoolers or a part time job for college students or a low-skill immigrant job, these were never supposed to be high-paying jobs that can sustain a family.
I mean they weren’t technically supposed to be anything really except make the owners of the companies money, but the point is that low-skill, low-paying jobs are a part of a healthy economy. Where things get unbalanced is when other parts of the economy are doing poorly people get desperate and go after whatever job they can get, like after the 2007-8 financial crisis. But even then it was hard for people to get those jobs because fast food restaurants knew these people with college degrees were just going to leave as soon as possible.
Anyway I think the cat is out of the bag and you might be right that people are looking to these jobs to at least be stable 9-5’s. I imagine this is going to mean that these businesses have to raise their prices and business models, which I guess is what happens when you introduce new regulations. So we’ll see how that hashes out, whether it’s getting rid of dine in, increasing responsibilities for paid crew, or in some cases just shutting down altogether.
You don't understand why the left doesn't want workers to live in desperate poverty?
What do you think "left wing" means?
Do you believe that no job in society should be available to people who want to work a few days a week or for people with no experience and low skills? Because if you make every job pay a living wage those positions will be a thing of the past.
Macroeconomics has a lot of tradeoffs, you don’t just get everything you want with thought terminating phrases like “the left doesn’t want workers to live in desperate poverty”. Nobody likes desperate poverty, but that doesn’t mean left-wing policies are automatically better just because they have good intentions.
you should be able to raise a family easily working a 40 hour week at McDonald's or Walmart.
Was there ever a time in the United States where you could easily raise a family working a menial, low-skilled job 40 hours a week? I'm skeptical. I also suspect that consumer goods are generally cheaper in comparison to wages than they were in 1920 or 1950.
I think 10 to 12 years ago it would have been doable. Now I think it would be impossible.
There are 40,000 coffee shops in the United States.
People who believe that it's just students working in there are crazy.
I think 10 to 12 years ago it would have been doable. Now I think it would be impossible.
There are 40,000 coffee shops in the United States.
People who believe that it's just students working in there are crazy.
10-12 years ago people were absolutely complaining about how little they were paid in fast food restaurants what do you mean?
Do you believe that no job in society should be available to people who want to work a few days a week or for people with no experience and low skills? Because if you make every job pay a living wage those positions will be a thing of the past.
Macroeconomics has a lot of tradeoffs, you don’t just get everything you want with thought terminating phrases like “the left doesn’t want workers to live in desperate poverty”. Nobody likes desperate poverty, but that doesn’t mean left-wing policies are a
Have you ever studied economics, or is just some MSM talking point?
There are different ways to go about it but there's no widely agreed upon economic principle that says huge chunks of workers must live in poverty.
Milton Friedman was a proponent of negative income Tax. Needless to say, many economists are far to his left.
Leftists would also give such people free HC, quality food for kids, public transportation and other things so they had better lives, as they do in other rich countries.
Have you ever studied economics, or is just some MSM talking point?
There are different ways to go about it but there's no widely agreed upon economic principle that says huge chunks of workers must live in poverty.
Milton Friedman was a proponent of negative income Tax. Needless to say, many economists are far to his left.
Leftists would also give such people free HC, quality food for kids, public transportation and other things so they had better lives, as they do in other rich countries.
This has nothing whatsoever to do with anything that we’re talking about. Why can’t you answer the question? Do you think that nobody should be able to have a part time job or entry level job, and that every single job has to be 40 hours a week, enough wages to raise a family (which by the was the original thing we were talking about not abject poverty), with benefits, etc?
You are way overstating that just because I gave an opinion on the minimum wage that I want to have zero regulation and no welfare. Did you see above that I gave a pretty cogent argument for giving welfare to minimum wage workers at mcdonalds and walmart so that costs don’t go up? Do you think Friedman supported a negative income tax because he thought minimum wage should be 40 dollars an hour or because he thought we did need to have some lower income jobs that can be supplemented by such a tax scheme?
When China and the DS owns and controls most of Congress and other military leaders (the compromised "woke" ones) and uses them to slowly weaken and tear us down then yes there's definitely an "enemy from within", including in the civilian population after they brought in over 10 million illegals, many of which were flown in by the cargo plane full in the middle of the night. Trump knows this, and Musk knows this (musk recently pretty much confirmed what I was saying happened in Maui on the day
Now you're back to pretending trump isn't President anymore? But what about maritime law and all of the DC incorporation stuff your high level sources released to us? I thought everything was already under control. I already voted against trump because I thought it didn't matter...oops.
This has nothing whatsoever to do with anything that we’re talking about. Why can’t you answer the question? Do you think that nobody should be able to have a part time job or entry level job, and that every single job has to be 40 hours a week, enough wages to raise a family (which by the was the original thing we were talking about not abject poverty), with benefits, etc?
You are way overstating that just because I gave an opinion on the minimum wage that I want to have zero regulation and no w
You originally said you didnt understand why leftists thought workers at McDonald's or WM, and I assume similar jobs, should be able to support themselves, or maybe it was a family.
If you meant, that their wages couldn't do that in a vacuum, but they should get supplemental $ and free HC and so forth so that they can still have a nice life, then I agree. I think most people who are considered leftists in The US would also agree.
Obviously, this is not the case currently.
this kind of tone deaf idiocy is exactly why kamala is going to whiff the layup and not become the first female president
just so incredibly stupid to not ignore but rather get behind this kind of nonsense
this kind of tone deaf idiocy is exactly why kamala is going to whiff the layup and not become the first female president
just so incredibly stupid to not ignore but rather get behind this kind of nonsense
She is a Detroit native speaking to a Detroit crowd. And the things she says are more or less true; and my understanding is Detroit is going through something of an economic recovery. So I am not sure the criticism is fair.
Detroit has a some negative stigma attached to for outsiders, but for my understanding is the perception of the people that live there is much less negative. I think this is a nothing burger.
She is a Detroit native speaking to a Detroit crowd. And the things she says are more or less true; and my understanding is Detroit is going through something of an economic recovery. So I am not sure the criticism is fair.
Detroit has a some negative stigma attached to for outsiders, but for my understanding is the perception of the people that live there is much less negative. I think this is a nothing burger.
that's kamala's official twitter actively agreeing that she'll make the entire country like detroit to the entire world
i get that a detroit rally will say such things, but it's another thing entirely for the campaign to blast that out nationwide
The economy is great for those who have assets (houses, stocks, etc).
It sucks for those who don’t owned them .
It has nothing to do with left or right .
The left want to help those without assets in many ways while the right doesn’t .
I mean how reducing taxes helps the poor if they don’t pay much taxes to begin with anyway ?
And all the great manual manufacturing jobs goes overseas to increase profits too….
And forget it about unions being a good thing for workers ….
What’s left ?
Thinking it’s Kamala or the left fault is funny .
They actually try to help them .
