Fringe conspiracy containment thread

Fringe conspiracy containment thread

23 August 2023 at 12:19 AM
Reply...

778 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

by ES2

You are taking this hyper literally, which is why almost everyone disagrees. Pw is right. Essentially every policy is discriminatory in some way. You favor vacations. "Discriminatory" against retirees, houswives and husbands, etc. Oh well. It is equitable and good.Moreover, you would eventually benefit from living in a more stable society. Better developed people. Less divo

The reason I would support more vacations has nothing to do with self interest - as a self-employed person I wouldn't get a paid vacation anyway.

I disagree that giving more benefits to parents would lead to the things you mention. Divorce in particular definitely increases when there is more support given to mothers, as they no longer feel the need to stay with the father of their children.

I'm not sure a "stable society" is even a positive, but I would think that society was more stable a hundred years ago, when there was less public support of parents and children than there is now.


The social safety net destabilizes society is a radical conspiracy. Evidence provided is 1920s were more stable because of less welfare. 1920s USA were a slightly different time to put it mildly. World was ravaged from war, there was alcohol prohibition, women just gained the right to vote.


by chillrob

That's ridiculous. There's no reason the government should be subsidizing the creation of new people at all. The US is in no danger of becoming depopulated; as I said previously, people are literally dying for a chance to move here.The only reason I can fathom for a disinterested person to support current Americans having more babies, instead of letting more people immigrate wo

equitable things can be seen as ridiculous, they arent mutually exclusive.

We need more americans so that people can support the retirees. Its important we have population growth so that we dont have population decline and turn out like china where one person needs to provide for 3 chinese citizens.

Depopulated? you think we are arguing about the USA becoming depopulated?

how would letting more people come here be racism? are you sure you know what that means? What race is being told they are worse than another race due to opening the borders (as america was intended)

re divorce: if american women dont want to be married to losers any longer then they should get a divorce. If american losers are sick of getting divorced then they should be more careful about who they marry and they should make sure they dont turn into fat slobs like everyone else. if you were a 40 year old american woman would you want to be dating a fat uneducated trump supporter? Thats like 25% of the country


by PointlessWords

how would letting more people come here be racism? are you sure you know what that means? What race is being told they are worse than another race due to opening the borders (as america was intended)

He said the exact opposite, that it would be racism to support population growth via citizens giving birth more instead of immigration.


PW, be honest, you cheated on the reading comprehension portion of that test, didn't you?


by ganstaman

He said the exact opposite, that it would be racism to support population growth via citizens giving birth more instead of immigration.

ty I misread

by d2_e4

PW, be honest, you cheated on the reading comprehension portion of that test, didn't you?

freeroll is still on! have you found five people with a higher score than me? prob cant find 3


Let me get this straight... you want me to canvass 2+2 to see who took the ASVAB and what they scored? And then you want me to find 5 people who scored higher than you, presumably with proof? And why would I want to do this again?


Sounds like the nut low.


by d2_e4

Let me get this straight... you want me to canvass 2+2 to see who took the ASVAB and what they scored? And then you want me to find 5 people who scored higher than you, presumably with proof? And why would I want to do this again?

its a freeroll. Also I told you Ill give you odds on if you can beat my score.


Here's more proof how people are being lied to right in their faces.

Since when does the Military (instead of Soluting their President) tells byden to walk towards him while pointing and showing him EXACTLY where to stand (since the brain dead stooge is a literal mental mess)?

Never. This is a just a presidential aid dressed up in a military uniform (which btw is far from protocal, especailly by not even wearing his hat while facing the president, not soluting him, and standing non shalontly in front of him. Real military men and women will easily see the difference This is just one of byden's baby sitters in a costume bought on amazon).

https://fb.watch/tePr-WSR0K/

But not only that, he's dressed up in a costume. Look how messed up and unoficail those ropes are, it looks like spagheti wtf is that?


According to Military regulation:
Red Arrow Top Left: that badge is never there.
Red Arrow Top Right: there’s zero matching insignia on the collar.
Red Arrow Middle Left: the aiguillette is not correct.
Red Arrow Bottom Left: if this was a real Presidential Aide… he’d have a Presidential Aide Badge… not an Armored Division Badge like this.

It’s the little things, norton


Two trailer park girls go round the outside, round the outside, round the outside
Guess who's back, back again, PlayBig's back, tell a friend


by Playbig2000

Since when does the Military (instead of Soluting their President)....?

...(which btw is far from protocal, especailly..., not soluting him, and standing non shalontly in front of him....

Look how messed up and unoficail those ropes are, it looks like spagheti wtf is that?

It’s the little things, norton

You are correct. It is the little things.


by jjjou812

You are correct. It is the little things.

Indeed. The military standing around non shalontly and not soluting him seems very far from protocal and especailly unoficail, like spagheti.

I fear our dear PB might be deteriorating faster than the subject of his ire.


thanks for pointing out the arrows are red, otherwise i'd be concerned over the fact that the only photo produced is cropped to lose all context, too blurry to see clearly, and relying upon a "trust me bro" source


What is this photo from? It looks like a NATO meeting from the background. Does NATO have uniforms for some people?


by d2_e4

Indeed. The military standing around non shalontly and not soluting him seems very far from protocal and especailly unoficail, like mom's spagheti.

FYP.

Big miss by you IMO.


Actually now that I'm looking more, that doesn't even look like a military uniform to me. He looks like a doorman or bellhop from a fancy old hotel.


by Bobo Fett

FYP.

Big miss by you IMO.

Damn. Good one.


Dressed up n messed up n unoficail ropes like spagheti while soluting byden


by jalfrezi

Dressed up n messed up n unoficail ropes like spagheti while soluting byden

non shalontly.

A military man must remain shalont at all times while on duty.


It's hard to work out exactly what it is that deters people from conspiracy theories and their advocates.


Playbig -
That is not a presidential aide.
Covers (or hats as you called them) are never worn inside unless under arms.

I hope this helps.


by jalfrezi

It's hard to work out exactly what it is that deters people from conspiracy theories and their advocates.

Not really.


by Didace

Playbig -
That is not a presidential aide.
Covers (or hats as you called them) are never worn inside unless under arms.

I hope this helps.

don't listen pb, i think didace is just upset his photo made it to the thread


by rickroll

don't listen pb, i think didace is just upset his photo made it to the thread

Don't be so shalont.

Reply...