Moderation Questions

Good ole Luckbox, always doing the difficult work that just has to be done, amirite?

It's prohibited to be very disruptive to the discussion. We can't list all the ways you can do that, but that is the general guideline we mod by. And now you know.

Is there some reason you like to troll me? In this case I'm not really sure what you're talking about. What work am I doing here?

Not trolling at all. I'm tired of you dragging volunteer moderators for no more reason than your reflexive "authority is always wrong" instinct. First it's that we should all consider that KS is banning people just because, and now it's nitpicking over Rococo's wording as he explains how he's not involved in the day-to-day modding. And then the "I'm not really sure what you're talking about" act you always pull. It's boring as hell, and just contributes to the reason it's so difficult to keep moderators in the forum. I think it's fine to question moderator decisions and not everyone has to agree. But rather than contributing to the discussion or providing some constructive criticism, it seems you're just here for the one-liner fly-bys.

I recently took a month off from posting in the forum, much less modding it.

We have very recent evidence of this happening

He said he wasn't a mod, yet his name is green and he is listed as a mod at the bottom of this forum. I don't care if he actively mods, or wants to not consider himself a mod....but he is still a mod.

Probably because you usually troll me with inane posts.

Yeah I'm not the one driving mods away.

And yeah I'd be less critical of the mods if they weren't banning people because others complained about them, locking threads for no reasons, and behaving like this place is their private fiefdom.

And which of these sins was I guilty of in your opinion?

None. You did fine. Pretty sure I've never complained about any of your decisions.

I am mad at and critical of mods that do their jobs - Luckbox

Every time a shitposter eats a ban, PW and Luckbox start getting that feeling that their numbers are coming due and launch a pre-emptive counterstrike.

How can a counterstrike be pre-emptive?

You’re beginning to sound like Norman Stanley Fletcher.

Going all in on the prison references lately, huh, kid?

Here ye here ye

I am no longer a mod! Just because my screen name is green and I have access to the mod forum does not mean I am a mod!

Also please do not harass the mods

Disruptive to conversation… like making up rules that don’t exist and then trying to get posters to follow such made up rules?

Double points if the poster is a mod, I assumed they weren’t allowed to make up rules and try to enforce them, but maybe I am wrong?

Please clarify by what you mean “disrupt”

Seems like the mods are disputing the convo more than anyone else

The definitive trait of moderators is that they moderate, not that their name is green and they have access to another forum.

Am incel that requires government payments to get something most get from the opposite sex for being attentive will never understand this point.

No man, you misunderstood, PW doesn't need hookers, he is very popular with the ladies. He was just suggesting that public hooker subsidy for a friend.

"Do unto others as they would do into you. Only for gawd's sake do it first".

Norman Stanley Fletcher

Nice quote. Lol, you think that bothers me? I find it entertaining, crack on.

Do you jack off to me? Seems like you love to talk and think about me

Do you wanna fight me? Or **** me. Can’t figure it out

Oh my, how forward. Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer some foreplay. Actually, coming to think of it, looks like we might have stumbled upon the root of your "friend's" problem.

Is it a problem if I jack off to you guys?

There doesn't seem to be a rule against it.