Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
It occurs to me now that I should probably chill on making any moves until after the election.
Anyway. You people make me mad.
We’re gonna keep Mets and rafiki back though for good measure. Let’s see if we can’t get through this next week together 😀
I don't know if it's a you thing to hold yourself to an unreasonably high standard, but your modding has been completely fine. Every mod here has generated at least the level of complaints you have and this is not an easy time to mod a politics forum.
No disrespect to CN who's doing what she thinks is best for the forum, but the best time for pol posters was the modless interim between Bowser leaving and the new mod regime starting.
It occurs to me now that I should probably chill on making any moves until after the election.
Anyway. You people make me mad.
We’re gonna keep Mets and rafiki back though for good measure. Let’s see if we can’t get through this next week together 😀
Soemthing good comes of it
Don't let them get you down. You see them at their worst
We can all be here together for the **** show
If the forum wants to allow pro-hamas viewpoints to exist and be defended, then CN way of modding the IP thread is the best possible one (no personal discussion, no censorship of any claim no matter how unsubstantiated from any party).
I have issues with CN modding but not in the IP thread (which is what makes people criticize her, from what i see here).
All this conflicting data, who's the favorite?
I shudder to imagine the den of iniquity that is Victor's twitter feed. Probably a lot of "professors of decolonisation."
yeah i hate smart people who read books and understand things, but unfortunately that's what the "tech overlords" force feed me...
wait, wut?
Victor isn’t the only one here who reads Caitlin Johnstone fwiw
I have no idea who that is. Is she a professor of decolonisation? What does she have against colons?
she is a very balanced "journalist" that thinks the world is "heading toward extinction because of climate destruction" (which is a claim that makes playbig look like a smart person).
she has the takes you can imagine correlate with that on all other topics.
she doesnt want Palestinians, Ukranians, or Russians to die so no I dont have any examples for you.
for others, they can use the google machine to decide for themselves.
she doesnt want Palestinians, Ukranians, or Russians to die so no I dont have any examples for you.
for others, they can use the google machine to decide for themselves.
Oh, that's nice. Is she an ideas person, like chez? "Sure would be nice if we could have world peace, I'll let you guys work out the details".
Ideas are not bad things D2. They what you get if you dont avoid thinking.
Details are important as well. They require more effort but well worth it.
Ideas are not bad things D2. They what you get if you dont avoid thinking.
Details are important as well. They require more effort but well worth it.
Yes, details are not really your "thing", and your so-called ideas are all completely vapid, along the lines of "would be good if there were less violence in prisons, we could just have no contact between the prisoners. You're the details guy, I'll let you fill in the blanks."
Oh, that's nice. Is she an ideas person, like chez? "Sure would be nice if we could have world peace, I'll let you guys work out the details".
yes she works form the idea that we shouldnt murder dozens of children a day for years on end. this is a tough idea for the propagandized Westerners to come to grips with.
