Moderation Questions
Moderation Questions
8
zs

Moderation Questions

The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa

30 January 2024 at 05:27 AM
Reply...

24481 Replies

8
zs


by chezlaw m

irrelevence would be the best defense I'd agree. But it's not entirely true and a laughable defense of the need to attack posters for what they say

You're confusing necessity and pleasure.


by King Spew m

I deleted posts of yours today for having no content, just venom.

At least Luc posts content for discussion.

You.... not so much any more.

Deleting people's posts is horrible. This isn't a museum that has to have its contents carefully curated. We are all capable of scrolling, and do this many times each day.


by checkraisdraw m

People don’t like being gaslit. We all saw what happened to people from the far left and don’t accept it. That doesn’t excuse deranged behavior from the right fyi.

Saying something is hard to pin down is a nothing statement. Almost everything that is scientific is hard to pin down.

Yes, and the word "pretty" in "pretty hard to pin down" that you omitted there is an indicator of it being significantly hard.


by jalfrezi m

You're confusing necessity and pleasure.

No I fully except that people get satisfaction from it. As long as they don't get to pretend it's to be taken seriously or is protected against tone policing then consenting adults.


Pile ons are bad and should be taken seriously as they are somewhat orchestrated to intimidate or harass, but one on one attacks are fine and are often seen in face to face debate too.


I tend to agree although we all different lines on what attacks are acceptable and/or reasonable.

It's the extent thaat I'm really addressing here. It's like negative politcs in that pesky real world. Negative has to be part of the striuggle but when it dominates then that's a catastrophie for everyone except the likes of trump etc. 80:20 positive to negative sounds ok to me but 80:20 the other way is game over territory.


I see. You'd never expressed it like that before, and I agree.


by jalfrezi m

Deleting people's posts is horrible. This isn't a museum that has to have its contents carefully curated. We are all capable of scrolling, and do this many times each day.

True.

But neither is this forum a public-restroom stall where folks can scrawl any drivel they want.


by geezerchess m

Since I've been here, trashing religion(s) has always been allowed. For example, mocking Christianity was one of d2_e4's favorite hobbies.Posting 'bigoted trash' about Saudi's or Iranian's or what-have-you (i.e. nationalities) certainly shouldn't be allowed imo.Islam, Christianity and Scientology are fair game just like Republicans and Democrats and Libertarians are fair game

theres at least one religion you definitely cant trash


by Victor m

theres at least one religion you definitely cant trash

I don't know of any. Please elaborate.


by Victor m

theres at least one religion you definitely cant trash

pretty sure you can mock jewish rituals and theology as much as you want in this forum if that's how you want to spend your time


by Luciom m

pretty sure you can mock jewish rituals and theology as much as you want in this forum if that's how you want to spend your time

THIS!!!

That is to say, I'm sure mocking Judaism would not be prohibited per se.

Mocking 'Jews' would be quite different from mocking 'Judaism' and of course would not be permitted here.


by geezerchess m

That is to say, I'm sure mocking Judaism would not be prohibited per se.

Agreed. Three quarters of d2's mockery applies just as much to Judaism as it does to Christianity.


by Rococo m

Agreed. Three quarters of d2's mockery applies just as much to Judaism as it does to Christianity.

Excellent point!


by King Spew m

I deleted posts of yours today for having no content, just venom.

At least Luc posts content for discussion.

You.... not so much any more.

Lol

You want to platform this self-important dipshit nazi, that’s fine

You thinking I owe you an obligation to DISCUSS THINGS with your self-important CONTENT CREATOR who is a literal nazi is so ****ing beyond the pale

I made 4 posts giving him as much intellectual honesty as he deserves. You decided his feelings and safe space mental health is of paramount importance. Says more about you than it does me

You decided Lucy is unbannable. You also decided anything other than discourse as adults with a guy who is advocating the mass murder of dissidents to his way of life is unacceptable. And you have let him overrun this forum so every conversation runs through him while also only choosing to moderate the people sick of him

Top marks


by StoppedRainingMen m

LolYou want to platform this self-important dipshit nazi, that’s fineYou thinking I owe you an obligation to DISCUSS THINGS with your self-important CONTENT CREATOR who is a literal nazi is so ****ing beyond the paleI made 4 posts giving him as much intellectual honesty as he deserves. You decided his feelings and safe space mental health is of paramount importance. Says more a

Wow, so much venom directed at a guy just for being a Nazi.


by Rococo m

Agreed. Three quarters of d2's mockery applies just as much to Judaism as it does to Christianity.

Indeed. And I'm technically a jew.


If you have made the choice that everything Lucy says is on the table, then everything said about Lucy, even as low content trolling, is also on the table

If my posts are the ones you are deleting and his posts are the ones you are protecting, congratulations on turning this bullshit forum into yet another far right safe haven. Eat Arby’s


by Trolly McTrollson m

Wow, so much venom directed at a guy just for being a Nazi.

Honestly that’s my bad, I should be more tolerant of nazis. The king has spoken


by geezerchess m

THIS!!!

That is to say, I'm sure mocking Judaism would not be prohibited per se.

Mocking 'Jews' would be quite different from mocking 'Judaism' and of course would not be permitted here.

Mocking religion is ok but mocking ethnosupremacism is bad?


by Victor m

Mocking religion is ok but mocking ethnosupremacism is bad?

I'm confident that you can mock "chosen people" beliefs as pure fantasy without any risk of getting banned.


currently yes


There should definitely be something programmed into the software that disables Lucy's account for 24 hours after either 20 posts or 20K words are reached for the day.


by d2_e4 m

Indeed. And I'm technically a jew.

Technically we’re all African.


by Rococo m

Agreed. Three quarters of d2's mockery applies just as much to Judaism as it does to Christianity.

The thing is even if you try to mock Judaism like writing a detailed critique of why the Book of Joshua is not only historically dubious but has god doing morally horrific things the vast majority of the people who argue against you will be christian or muslim.

Reply...