[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff

It's exactly what reproducibility means.

Are you using the new site? It has some issues with question marks, I've noticed. In particular it does something to them such that if you edit a post on the new site and that post contains question marks, when you view the post on the old site, they disappear. I haven't tried to create a new post on the new site but I suspect similar issues there.

Sometimes I have to use it when the main one hangs when loading, which it does a lot.

I suspect that is the root cause of any punctuation glitches you are experiencing.

It is what it means, in that space missions have repeatedly obtained pictures of the whole Earth.

The 'Hutchison effect' you mention, on the other hand, has not proved to be reproducible, which among other reasons is why it's considered a foolish hoax.

Much like every other nutjob out there, Billy loves to accuse others of doing exactly what he does and claim their evidence fails exactly the standards that his own evidence fails. Always projection with these people.

I think the only reproduction Billy would accept is to fly two more planes into two more 100 story buildings.

At this point he's so far gone nothing would penetrate that skull.

Just to fully make the point that every conceivable permutation of the definition of reproducibility is covered here:

"Reproducibility is the ability of an independent researcher to achieve the same results as an original study using the same raw data, analytical methods, and/or code."

Here is a photo from SpaceX, which is a fully independent from NASA, private company.

Source:

https://www.space.com/spacex-launch-video-earth-march-2023

Space

Spectacular SpaceX video shows Earth as beautiful blue marble in blackness of space

This photographic result has been fully reproduced by multiple independent sources.

Still not quite getting 'reproducibility' correct. Keep trying!

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk

Not quite what reproducibility means. Do keep trying though!

(Hint: see the bbc bitesize links i posted earlier. Makes learning fun)

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk

Dismissing photographic evidence of the earth being round because it's "not reproducible" has to be the most insanely moronic thing Billy has said ITT, and there's some stiff ****ing competition.

Billy, be honest, how much crack do you smoke to fry your brain this hard?

Billy... you don't actually know what it means.

My second guess would have been Burbank or Hollywood.

I suppose the independent groups of researchers *could* be considered sovereign government military units and private corporations closely connected to sovereign government military units.

I mean, we can't rule that out... well use your imaginations people!

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk

Yeah, it's a mystery. All that KS3 science.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk

It even looks completely fake. But what is the point of making it look real. The **** munching sheeple are going to buy it every time.

Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk

Billy, why do the lizard people want us to think that the earth is round?

Well they do exist in another dimension so how is billy supposed to know? Isn’t deducing their existence enough for you?

Apparently we can dismiss round earth because the pictures "look fake" but we can't gauge how long a building took to collapse by watching a video of it. Go figure.

How would it look if was real?

They could’ve thrown in some star streaks or motion cues to make it look like they were actually moving through space - some occasional space debris whizzing by or something.