POG Politics Thread Version 3
Come on in! Since Dustin is taking his ball and going home, it's time to start a new politics thread.
as a group, Delta force have dangerously bad mental health. they are extremely violent, and immune from prosecution, even for murdering people in the United states(which they do)
most/all of them are addicted to many drugs. they have to be to cope with their awful mental health
also they fight and die for oil companies, and do things like shoot kids
smh. But grok does say this is completely unverified. Possibly BS
we need to normalize shunning:
billionaires
cops
landlords
soldiers
mainstream "journalists"
everyone in the oil industry
everyone who makes cia propaganda like "Jack Ryan" or "zero dark thirty"
patriots
priests
anyone in the prison industry
anyone in health insurance
we should start treating them like the murdering, thieving, Nazi parasite boot lickers they are
just add fatties to the list and i'm onboard
Trump is drinking Maduro's milkshake.
You're not going to convince anyone Hakeem Jeffries is a radical lefty activist. He's a demented Zionist freak.
I wouldn't piss on him if he were on fire. If he were drowning I would throw him an anchor. May his gas tank be full of sugar and his wool suits be itchy.
Hakeem Jeffries is legit worse than Nancy Pelosi.
speaking of liberal snakes, mamdani called venezuela and cuba oppressive regimes
What's the difference between leaders in the USA and leaders elsewhere?
I'm thinking about what you said here:
Filthy, is there anyone who either
1) Is/Was an elected official, or
2) Had a legitimate chance to become an elected official
at any level of government that you would classify as "good"?
I campaigned for ralph Nader a couple of times. idk if you'd say he had a legit chance to be elected. he might have had like 3% in 2000? but basically no. it makes sense. the USA is literally founded on genocide and slavery. the founders are universally worshipped. capitalism is considered an absolute necessity, as are cops and prisons and exploitation. it follows that members
People are the same.
The US can never be invaded. Our land can never be annexed by any neighbor.
Our adversity is manufactured. There are no threats. The GDP is absurd. Resources are practically infinite.
Leaders elsewhere have actual threats to their sovereignty. They need treaties and alliances more than anything.
The US is just doing business deals.
What's the difference between leaders in the USA and leaders elsewhere?
I'm thinking about what you said here:
I don't know much about leaders elsewhere. so a lot of it is guesswork.
but USA is the world aggressor, and also the leading influence towards runaway capitalism, and biggest enemy of communism.
basically USA is the one pointing the gun(and using it), and the one with its foot on the gas
also, the Bolshevik revolution, and Lenin, seem pretty ****ing awesome. usa crushed it.
cuban revolution seemed pretty awesome. USA crushed it.
Haitian revolution seemed pretty awesome. USA crushed it.
slavery, genocide, Hawaii, the Philippines, middle east, central America, south America, southeast asia
also USA is my home, so these leaders are kinda my leaders.
if you're saying other countries would do the same thing given the opportunity... yeah, I'm sure some would. but not all. but either way, USA is the one actually doing it right now, and it's also the country I've lived in my whole life, and my ancestors(white and native) for more generations than USA has even existed
i'm not sure what kind of answer you're looking for. I want to try to answer your question.
I see mamdani and AOC deeply on team USA empire billionaire ruling class. they'd like the ruling class to control maybe 50% of the world's wealth, as opposed to 90%. **** that. that's not any kind of solution. that's unfair, oppressive, and ruinous
if we want to live in a world where people respect each other and treat each other fairly, we can't have a ruling class living in luxury while workers go without.
People are the same.
The US can never be invaded. Our land can never be annexed by any neighbor.
Our adversity is manufactured. There are no threats. The GDP is absurd. Resources are practically infinite.
Leaders elsewhere have actual threats to their sovereignty. They need treaties and alliances more than anything.
The US is just doing business deals.
it's the only manufacturing left that we do here
actually even our adversity manufacturing has been shipped overseas to bots posting on socials
Of all the government types I have the most sympathy for socialism. So I want to think the socialist governments do a good job but of course one thing socialism does is centralize a lot of resources which is amazing if you want to steal them.
So what you get is a lot of corruption and murder. Because people fight to the death over scarce resources.
And you can't have people praising Capitalism on the TV so of course you control all the media. But regimes do that, Trump is doing it now.
What we have to worry about isn't what government type is best or who should run it, but how to thrive regardless.
I read a bit about Maduro. I'm admittedly ignorant of world affairs.
He was a bus driver and started a union. He was tutored in Cuba by one of Castro's closest guys. Wikipedia says it was Cuba who directed him to get close to Hugo Chavez.
This is as lefty as it gets. Che is in his grave going whoa that's hefty lefty.
Fair, but it seems weird to criticize somebody for calling a leader oppressive if you don't know much about it.
It often seems like you just want to take unprovoked shots at [insert left-wing Democrat here].
I was criticizing him for following the script of USA empire "these foreign regimes who defy us are oppressive". like stfu about Cuba and Venezuela, we have enough ****ing repression right here in usa, and including in NYC where he is mayor and leaving in that Nazi police commissioner who did all kinds of horrible repressive ****.
imo the shots I'm taking are extremely provoked. anyone who is part of USA govt deserves lots of criticism.
Of all the government types I have the most sympathy for socialism. So I want to think the socialist governments do a good job but of course one thing socialism does is centralize a lot of resources which is amazing if you want to steal them.So what you get is a lot of corruption and murder. Because people fight to the death over scarce resources. And you can't have people prai
capitalism is great at centralizing resources too
but yeah agree that there isn't much we can do about governments, and probably the best we can do is just to thrive. or at least get by.
sadly, i'm no hero
sorry eyebooger if I'm coming across as hostile. I respect you, and like you. for sure! very much <3
I'm just so ****ing sick of this ****ing bullshit. and we're lead to believe we have a democracy and USA is the good guys. it's just so crystal clear that USA is the bad guy, and always has been. even in ****ing ww2. USA wasn't as bad as Nazi Germany, but we were terrible ****ign war criminals in ww2, and buddy buddy with Hitler and the Nazis in the 30s
sorry eyebooger if I'm coming across as hostile. I respect you, and like you. for sure! very much <3
We're cool, and always have been. ♥
I just think you're wrong about some stuff, and you think I'm wrong about some stuff. Nothing wrong with that. I'd say you're right more than you're wrong.
At least we both hate Elon.
yeah! **** Elon!
can you imagine what kind of moron would like Elon?!?!?!?!
lol mark ♥
He's single-handedly saving the human race. Not to mention saving freedom of speech and getting Trump elected by buying Twitter.
He did save the freedom to say slurs on Twitter.
