LeBron > Jordan GOAT Super AIDS Containment, solved #22999 post by Matt R. (addendum #23174)
Very impressed with the minute sequence where LeBron clearly lost the ball headed to the rim, heat got the ball anyway and scored, then he elbows his defender in the chin, drawing a defensive foul and stern talking to from the official and hitting a 3.
It's these ref assisted 5 point swings in close games that truly bring out the best in great players.
Link to post of why Elon Musk is the true GOAT: https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
The thread that will go on for years..........
vs.
"balanced offensive attack" and “balanced scoring attack” does not mean equal distribution of shots and points.
that's exactly what it means... Don't try to "Kamala Harris" this thing... balanced scoring attack means a balanced attack, while unbalanced would be one guy at 34 ppg and everyone else under 16.
the 04' Pistons or the 13' Heat had a balanced scoring attack in the Finals, while the 90's Bulls, 03' Spurs, 15' Warriors, and 00' Lakers didn't and had 1 guy carry the scoring load (they were all highly-assisted 1st options that could drop 40 while the ball moves and therefore had sufficient brand at high scoring levels to carry the scoring load against the top teams)...
Again, lebron's inability to carry the scoring load is one of the many reasons that I rate him lower.
lol @ FG using JJ as the number 1 option in Memphis.
It's Morant.
I don't care that he's not leading them in ppg. He's coming back from an injury. And if you look at it as a per minute thing. They are basically level.
You don't think come playoff time Ja is going to be the first option?
So dumb.
But I guess I threw you a bone by introducing "primary ballhandler" into the conversation, since apparently you feel more comfortable lying that the Warriors system uses a "primary ballhandler" (it doesn't), or that Curry is a "primary ballhandler" (he isn't)... Accordingly, I'll go back to low-assisted 1st option, since it's hard to call someone a "low-assisted 1st option" when they have a 48% career assisted rate and 4.79 hold-time.
I'm curious how you know this if you don't watch games?
Are you saying you have been lying to us?
BTW. Admitting you watch games actually helps any of your arguments rather than hurting. But I know you will say you don't because you think it's a good thing.
