NBA 2025-26 Season Thread: THE NY KNICKS ARE CHAMPIONS! BING BONG!

NBA 2025-26 Season Thread: THE NY KNICKS ARE CHAMPIONS! BING BONG!

Lettuce NBA!

and lettuce lol @ James Harden

25 October 2023 at 12:08 AM
Reply...

12392 Replies


Earlier posts are available on our legacy forum HERE

Am I the only one who will never find the fake AI stuff funny


by Montrealcorp

Im guessing they need all those revenues to pay those players insane wages.
Would players agree to a salary cut by playing less games ?

No.


by RT

Starting line ups through the semis:Pacers:Haliburton-Nembhard-Nesmith-Siakam-TurnerMin 164OffRtg 124.4DefRtg 102.3NetRtg +22.1Knicks:Brunson-Bridges-OG-Hart-KATMin 266OffRtg 107.4DefRtg 112.1NetRtg -4.7 Thunder:SGA-JWill-Dort-CHET-IHartMin 134OffRtg 111.3DefRtg 107.4NetRtg +3.9Wolves:ANT-Conley-McDaniels-Randle-RudyMin 130OffRtg 117.9DefRtg 98.8NetRtg +19.1Really just a measur

Swap Steph injury with Jokic then rerun numbers imo.


by Cinarocket

Am I the only one who will never find the fake AI stuff funny

Yes. They’re hilarious.


by Montrealcorp

Im guessing they need all those revenues to pay those players insane wages.
Would players agree to a salary cut by playing less games ?

I think you could probably cut from 82 games to 70 and not even lose much revenue, would the national TV deal even change much? Probably not at all.

Problem is once you cut games and not much changes on the injury front, then what do you do? You already cut and can't go back.

It is tough because you don't wanna start the playoffs in March and you don't want the finals in July, not much room to maneuver.


I bet these injuries are an anolomy and not a trend. Meaning in future years we will see less discussion on it.

I'm basing this off of no evidence and straight from my bum.


Players and doctors are soft imo.


by VincentVega

.

I actually predicted it correctly, I never do that.

Yeah, you got that one.


VinnieVega is the reason I got on Pacers 80-1 after their first game w MIL.

Dude is ELITE.


by Onlydo2days

I think you could probably cut from 82 games to 70 and not even lose much revenue, would the national TV deal even change much? Probably not at all.Problem is once you cut games and not much changes on the injury front, then what do you do? You already cut and can't go back.It is tough because you don't wanna start the playoffs in March and you don't want the finals in July, no

How you gonna cut the schedule by 15% and not lose much revenue?


Increase ticket and concession prices.


If we can’t shorten reg szn (of course it won’t be shortened), then:

Get rid of the all star game completely.

Make every playoff round best-of-9, BUT: your reg season games count toward the playoff series. Ex: NYK / IND series would start 2-1 Knicks. NYK need to win 3 games or IND need to win 4 games to advance.


by GTO2.0

How you gonna cut the schedule by 15% and not lose much revenue?

Well I don't think it would affect the TV money much.

Just concessions/gate/tickets. How much of the NBAs revenue is that these days even?

Cutting games from 82 to 70 doesn't seem like it would cut it more than 2-3%. If it was actually thought that it would reduce injuries, they might look at it. But I'm sure they feel it won't do much.


by Onlydo2days

Well I don't think it would affect the TV money much.

Just concessions/gate/tickets. How much of the NBAs revenue is that these days even?

Cutting games from 82 to 70 doesn't seem like it would cut it more than 2-3%. If it was actually thought that it would reduce injuries, they might look at it. But I'm sure they feel it won't do much.

are you sure ?
its 12 games per team , on tv ? like 300 games less ?
Dont they gain ( i dont know if old model of revenues in sports still exist so you might be right) massive amount of money in commercials viewing for example ?


I had a dream that I wanted to bet Julius Randle 9+ assists but couldn't get the bet in before gametime.


by Montrealcorp

are you sure ?
its 12 games per team , on tv ? like 300 games less ?
Dont they gain ( i dont know if old model of revenues in sports still exist so you might be right) massive amount of money in commercials viewing for example ?

Amazon, NBC, ESPN only air a small fraction of the games and that is where a lot of their TV revenue comes from

i dunno why it would go down so much if there were a few less games that weren't on those platforms

but why would a league even lose any money for no reason?


Wolves in 5
Bye


Antman gonna snatch SGA's chain.

Wolves in 6.


Gotta root for Minny. Edwards might be getting his a little early but he's the real deal and I've always felt Randle was underrated. Even so with the Lakers.

OKC should be a force for at least the next 3-5 years so they'll win eventually. This is actually one of the easiest paths one could get imo as while Denver has Jokic they are very flawed and Minny is simply a very tough 6 seed.


by All-inMcLovin

I had a dream that I wanted to bet Julius Randle 9+ assists but couldn't get the bet in before gametime.

You should have bet Julius Randle o0.5 heat checks from 35 ft.


My favorite twolf

Tho is Randal McDaniel

NIMAAAAAAAAAA


OKC in 5


sonics in 3


I can’t even begin to imagine the delusion of seeing Orange Julius pull off his heroic performance of dead money scoring while SGA and woofwoof put up complete duds and still the thunder won by 20 and thinking the wolves win once

Sonics in 2


by Onlydo2days

Well I don't think it would affect the TV money much.

Just concessions/gate/tickets. How much of the NBAs revenue is that these days even?

Cutting games from 82 to 70 doesn't seem like it would cut it more than 2-3%. If it was actually thought that it would reduce injuries, they might look at it. But I'm sure they feel it won't do much.

Local TV is 13%, tickets are 26%, concessions and parking are 8% of revenue. Pretty sure ownership is gonna care when you cut the number of home games from 41 to 35. https://x.com/Brooks_Gate/status/1813238...

Reply...