Moderation Questions
Moderation Questions
8
zs

Moderation Questions

The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa

30 January 2024 at 05:27 AM
Reply...

24478 Replies

8
zs


From wiki

These are military casualties

USA losses 400k

UK 383

SU 10m

Poland 300k

Japan 2m

Italy 300k

Germany 5m

China 3.5m


by PointlessWords m

From wiki

USA losses 400k

UK 383

SU 10m

Poland 300k

Japan 2m

Italy 300k

Germany 5m

China 3.5m

Yes, it's well known Russian leaders use their men as cannon fodder and have a no retreat policy. They're doing it now in Ukraine. What do you think the casualty count proves?


Happy birthday, gangsta, and belated happy birthday, didace


now thats some legit amazing propaganda.


Now then. To the rest of you, Victor has recently served a lengthy sentence and he has been on good behavior since returning.

You are all welcome to challenge the content he posts, but the personal comments need to stop right now. It’s not productive to our community and does nothing to foster community engagement.

It should also be considered that anyone who intentionally attempts to troll someone to their tipping point is going to get the same infractions or penalties as the other person.


by jalfrezi m

It's just bullying, all the time, of the same person. It's not nice to see.

If you want to be an arrogant, controversial figure, you're going to get the reaction you campaigned for. That's not bullying, it's how humans interact with one another. Subsequently playing the victim card is pathetic and Trump-esque.


by d2_e4 m

Yes, it's well known Russian leaders use their men as cannon fodder and have a no retreat policy. They're doing it now in Ukraine. What do you think the casualty count proves?

what metric would you need to see to convince you that the the Nazis couldn’t have been beaten without the Soviets?

What metric to agree that Soviets did over 50% of fighting?


by Crossnerd m

Now then. To the rest of you, Victor has recently served a lengthy sentence and he has been on good behavior since returning. You are all welcome to challenge the content he posts, but the personal comments need to stop right now. It’s not productive to our community and does nothing to foster community engagement.It should also be considered that anyone who intentionally attem

What personal comments? Every comment I have seen has been criticising Victor's views.


by d2_e4 m

Bruh, I don't think you are really in a position to be commenting on others' reading comprehension in general, or in this instance specifically.

Wanna bet on my highest lsat score? I haven’t taken it yet.


by PointlessWords m

what metric would you need to see to convince you that the the Nazis couldn’t have been beaten without the Soviets?

What metric to agree that Soviets did over 50% of fighting?

Wtf dude. Do you understand the difference between "Stalin defeated Hitler" and "The allies couldn't have defeated Hitler without Stalin"? Do you think these mean the same thing?


by PointlessWords m

Wanna bet on my highest lsat score? I haven’t taken it yet.

I have no idea what it is, but I'll bet that I can beat you on it.


by PointlessWords m

what metric would you need to see to convince you that the the Nazis couldn’t have been beaten without the Soviets?

What metric to agree that Soviets did over 50% of fighting?

nothing you wrote here was being discussed, go back and start over

try to understand what people are talking about before you try to tell us you got it all figured out first


D2, you yourself admitted at the top of this page that you are engaging in mockery.

This isn’t a debate. I’m telling you to stop.


by d2_e4 m

Wtf dude. Do you understand the difference between "Stalin defeated Hitler" and "The allies couldn't have defeated Hitler without Stalin"? Do you think these mean the same thing?

damn, slow ponied


It’s called a Work in progress


by d2_e4 m

Wtf dude. Do you understand the difference between "Stalin defeated Hitler" and "The allies couldn't have defeated Hitler without Stalin"? Do you think these mean the same thing?

how literal are you guys going to take this?


by Crossnerd m

D2, you yourself admitted at the top of this page that you are engaging in mockery.

This isn’t a debate. I’m telling you to stop.

Of his views, yes. Not of him. I have not made any personal remarks about the poster, so I don't know what you're telling me to stop.


by Victor m

how literal are you guys going to take this?

Well, you subsequently stated you meant "90%", so pretty literally.


pretty soon they will deboonk it by saying that I meant that Stalin personally killed millions of German soldiers and then shot Hitler in the head.


soviets provided the manpower, usa provided the everything else, both were essential

in 1943 alone the usa produced more aircraft than germany had produced in its entire history

also in 1943 alone the usa produced more naval tonnage than every other combatant combined since the start of the war

god bless the usa, greatest country in the world, could've easily sat out and watched while the rest of the world (and my great grandparents on ma's side specifically) turn into dust, but instead it stepped up and saved the world


by Victor m

pretty soon they will deboonk it by saying that I meant that Stalin personally killed millions of German soldiers and then shot Hitler in the head.

Lol dude, everyone can see exactly what you wrote in this thread in the last few hours, you know this, right? Why are you trying to pretend that you meant something completely different now?


Soviets did about 90% to win the war and would have won without lend-lease. thats it.

you can quibble over the 90% figure. maybe it was only 80%!


Hyperbole


by PointlessWords m

It’s called a Work in progress

Maybe complete the work before you post your thoughts about how everyone else is wrong on the matter?


by Victor m

Soviets did about 90% to win the war and would have won without lend-lease. thats it.

you can quibble over the 90% figure. maybe it was only 80%!

Ok, so we're back to you owning the claim you made (if leaving yourself some room to walk it back mildly), this is progress.

Reply...