2024 NFL Regular Season: g-bebe’s Lamar attempts to slay Dom’s Josh for title of mafia boss
2024 NFL Regular Season: g-bebe’s Lamar attempts to slay Dom’s Josh for title of mafia boss
8
zs

2024 NFL Regular Season: g-bebe’s Lamar attempts to slay Dom’s Josh for title of mafia boss

You know, since the Super Bowl periodically i will watch the CBS Sinatra intro cuz it was ****ing magnificent. Halfway t

09 August 2024 at 01:34 AM
Reply...

4116 Replies

8
zs


by marknfw m

tank tank tank!


by ligastar m

The DAK ATTACK is done for the season.

by feel wrath m

Imagine if they hadn’t overspent on Dak and had let the season play out.

The Dak Prescott era is not much better than the Tony Romo era.


by newguyhere m

I asked AI to create a video of Tua and Miami winning the Super Bowl, and this is what it spit out

when tua orders from the nfl custom shop

Spoiler
Show


Spoiler
Show



by feel wrath m

Imagine if they hadn’t overspent on Dak and had let the season play out.

Eh

Even if it plays out this way Dak is going to get a legendary contract in the open market. The raiders would probably have paid more than he ended up getting


Except its not the Cowboys paying the tab.

They should have picked up Fields who easily could have gotten them 9 wins this year on the cheap. But they ruined their franchise for 4+ years by signing Dak.

Say it out loud: the Raiders sign Dak to a record contract. Raiders says it all.


Of course Fields wouldn't get them 9 wins lmao


He got a worse team 4 wins in 6 games, LOL


PIT ain't worse than DAL

Fields wouldn't get this DAL team to 9 wins. 6 or 7 sounds about right


by PokerHero77 m

He got a worse team 4 wins in 6 games, LOL

Pittsburgh worse than Dallas? You can't honestly think that, I was going to say outside of the QB but you actually think Fields is better than Dak. Or comparable I guess, if you think Dak would get 9+ wins.

Fields is 0-24 when the opposing team scores more than 20 points


Dallas would be a different team with their two best defenders. But yeah, Fields losing his spot to Russ doesn’t not suggest he could be a big winner elsewhere


Dak has been a top 10 QB throughout his career. Just look at his stats. They are better than Burrow's, for example. People just like to talk **** because his playoff record isn't the best, but really because he plays for Dallas. If he played for any other team we'd be saying how good he is.

However, this year has not been so good, but that has far more to do with a bad offensive line and no running game. Dak totally earned his contract.


by GusJohnsonGOAT m

Dak has been a top 10 QB throughout his career. Just look at his stats. They are better than Burrow's, for example. People just like to talk **** because his playoff record isn't the best, but really because he plays for Dallas. If he played for any other team we'd be saying how good he is.However, this year has not been so good, but that has far more to do with a bad offensive

So long as you’d say the same thing about Kirk Cousins then you’re right. Because if you go off stats they are exactly the same player….Kirk’s are actually a little better


Carolina wins!
Sorry heels


Almost thought #1 Chiefs wouldn't be a thing this week.



Hopefully the hail holds off this week for the 17.Cardinals


by newguyhere m

Almost thought #1 Chiefs wouldn't be a thing this week.

+58 points, they can't keep getting away with this !!!

doesn't even seem controversial to say that they shouldn't be #1 ..... and to all the many haters out there, take solace in the fact that this all has the feel of them imploding in the playoffs with someone beating them by 30 or something quote for posterity


that's why The Lions are the true #1 team


by GusJohnsonGOAT m

Dak has been a top 10 QB throughout his career. Just look at his stats. They are better than Burrow's, for example. People just like to talk **** because his playoff record isn't the best, but really because he plays for Dallas. If he played for any other team we'd be saying how good he is.However, this year has not been so good, but that has far more to do with a bad offensive

And Burrow's OL is so much better.

Really, Dak >= Burrow? Dak is the primary reason DAL will never be a SB contender. Pretender, of course.


What are odds of a parlay with all these div winners?

AZ
DET
ATL
WAS
LAC
PIT
HOU
BUF

BUF is a complete lock and DET/ATL/HOU are pretty close.


by 72off m

+58 points, they can't keep getting away with this !!!

doesn't even seem controversial to say that they shouldn't be #1 ..... and to all the many haters out there, take solace in the fact that this all has the feel of them imploding in the playoffs with someone beating them by 30 or something quote for posterity

People are just naturally more impressed by high octane offenses so I get if they have the Ravens or Lions at 1.

They're wrong though.


by PokerHero77 m

What are odds of a parlay with all these div winners?

AZ
DET
ATL
WAS
LAC
PIT
HOU
BUF

BUF is a complete lock and DET/ATL/HOU are pretty close.

I think most sites suspend future bets while games are in progress.


Dak >= burrow is objectively wrong

And I say this as someone who can’t stand Skyline Mathers


by bazooka87 m

Pittsburgh worse than Dallas? You can't honestly think that, I was going to say outside of the QB but you actually think Fields is better than Dak. Or comparable I guess, if you think Dak would get 9+ wins.

They played H2H wk 5, PIT was 2.5 pt fav = HFA and DAL won.

Fields is 0-24 when the opposing team scores more than 20 points

How soon we forget Fields wasted 4 years of his career in a sh*thole called CHI.


They won with Dak playing vs Fields, funny that. The Broncos were 3 point home faves vs the Raiders in week 5 as well, are they comparable teams?

Yes Chicago is ass, it's still 0-24


by bazooka87 m

Pittsburgh worse than Dallas? You can't honestly think that, I was going to say outside of the QB but you actually think Fields is better than Dak. Or comparable I guess, if you think Dak would get 9+ wins.

Fields is 0-24 when the opposing team scores more than 20 points

He's due!

Reply...