Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
Why do you guys seriously discuss things that were never meant to be taken seriously? I’m starting to get worried that some of you can’t tell the difference..
Well, given a good chunk of the world still has strict rules severely restricting interactions between non related members of the opposite sex because of low male impulse control in their societies (although the rationales are normally cloaked in religious mumbo jumbo) it is obviously something literally billions of people take very seriously.
I mean, you're just describing state-mandated eugenics. If we ignore the obvious biological danger of reduced genetic diversity, which you probably should not, you only need a quick perusal of history on the subject.Firstly, the goal of pretty much all such programs have been to make society safer, stronger and better. They have never achieved this. Once you unwrap the shiny pa
I'm torn between "lol" and "**** off"
Well, given a good chunk of the world still has strict rules severely restricting interactions between non related members of the opposite sex because of low male impulse control in their societies (although the rationales are normally cloaked in religious mumbo jumbo) it is obviously something literally billions of people take very seriously.
Ok so if you guys know yourselves that men are trash why get so mad at me for stating the obvious 😀
I don't care much for the way you want to play god with picking and choosing and pruning and designing topics and threads and where they all should go.
What are you talking about? I wasn't "picking and choosing and pruning...yada yada" anything. I literally was asking the question if you wanted to move it to a dedicated thread.
What are you talking about? I wasn't "picking and choosing and pruning...yada yada" anything. I literally was asking the question if you wanted to move it to a dedicated thread.
I was trying to make a joke like you were playing eugenics with threads. Just a joke.
I don't want another thread though. Despite what tame_dueces thinks, you can joke about eliminating all the males from the population or thread eugenics.
I encourage it actually
I was trying to make a joke like you were playing eugenics with threads. Just a joke.
I don't want another thread though. Despite what tame_dueces thinks, you can joke about eliminating all the males from the population or thread eugenics.
😀
Sorry. Like I said before, I'm too dumb for this forum.
Anyway, I agree that light-hearted banter about slaughtering billions of people is perfectly acceptable.
I don't know if anyone is really offended, but, if so, it's like the caricature of liberals. Wanting action about offensive words and jokes and impotent when it comes to offensive substance.
Ok so if you guys know yourselves that men are trash why get so mad at me for stating the obvious 😀
Because I think you are underestimating the potential blowback of having a society which doesn't work well for low status males, and then gloating over it.
If you think Donald Trump is bad, believe me it can be much worse. Most "revolutions" are caused by demagogues riling up low status males to violence, and what comes after is normally always worse than before.
Females in most societies through most times have had much less freedoms and liberties than western women today. But at the end of the day the current Western arrangement only exists because most men are ok with it. If one day they decided they weren't, things could go backward real fast. It wouldn't be the first time; not even the first time in most of our lifetimes.
To bring up a Star Wars analogy, women are C3PO (technically R2-D2) and men are Chewbacca; and maybe the strategy of letting the Wookie win (at least sometimes) has some merit.
You’re so embarrassing
Dunyan,
You're not as bad as mongidig or luciom in this regard or probably that craig dude, but why so fragile about it? Like, you're really scared women are taking over?
Dunyan,
You're not as bad as mongidig or luciom in this regard or probably that craig dude, but why so fragile about it? Like, you're really scared women are taking over?
No. No risk of women actually taking over. It is just too outside the parameters of their genetic programming.
But as a member of the the white collar administrative class who has it pretty good in the current system, I respect that low status males under the right circumstances can revolt and destroy society. And I am wary of society moving in directions that I interpret as making this more likely.
The risk isn't women taking over. The risk is this.
And a society that looks like that wouldn't be very good for males like me or you, on top of being sucky for pretty much all females.
You mean social programming, specifically from you *******s
The masculine exists in every individual including the hyper feminists like CN. When you demonize and deny it, it becomes unconscious and manifests itself in distorted + unhealthy ways.
Nobody benefits when this happens.
The masculine exists in every individual including the hyper feminists like CN. When you demonize and deny it, it becomes unconscious and manifests itself in distorted + unhealthy ways.
Nobody benefits when this happens.
In the Garden of Eden, the serpent represents masculinity. Initially, both Adam and Eve cast out the serpent, but it can’t be completely expelled.
Eventually, the wise person lowers himself in humiliation and identifies with the serpent.
As the masculine, you think you’re supposed to progress the story by engaging Adam, but this is where the mystery reveals itself. It’s actually the feminine which is required to progress the story.
As the story goes, the serpent offers the forbidden fruit to the female and she accepts the communion.. because the true bride recognizes her rightful husband (even when he appears as a disgusting monster).
Match that Rococo.
Boy, thread got a bit confusing there for a second, but I'm glad craig is here now to clear things up.
