Moderation Questions
Moderation Questions
8
zs

Moderation Questions

The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa

30 January 2024 at 05:27 AM
Reply...

24477 Replies

8
zs


by King Spew m

Luc is not a terrible poster..... but most of his ideas were terrible.

What a meaningful distinction


by King Spew m

Luc is not a terrible poster..... but most of his ideas were terrible.

Still, he's Italian and Italians over a certain age remember the 'Years of Lead' when the leftist terrorist Red Brigades were rampant. (Though some Italians, like Luciom, tend to overlook or discount the neo-Fascists and the mafia who were also incredibly violent at that time.)


by Rococo m

CN obviously unbanned Luciom because she got annoyed with everyone else, not because she changed her mind about Luciom.

Quiet you :p


Should the creators of the Avengers films not have been allowed to expose millions of viewers to Thanos since Thanos argued for and acted on murdering half of humanity?

Would the Avengers films be better without Thanos?

Censorious leftists who demand a frictionless existence should not be appeased. And they should not be moderators.

It’s not like calling for the murder of leftists is a reoccurring theme of this subforum. If it were, then that would be different. Luciom has been rightfully shamed for expressing that impulse. Continue shaming him for that if you feel it necessary.

But that wasn’t even the post that got him banned. He was banned over some BS by someone acting out her trauma fantasy in a public space (for the umteenth time).


by craig1120 m

He was banned over some BS by someone acting out her trauma fantasy in a public space (for the umteenth time).

"Trauma fantasy"?


CN deserves credit for lifting the ban. I should have mentioned that in my previous post.


He obviously knows he's unbanned.
Pretty sure he has and alt account and he is satisfied with it.


by BobTheSlob m

Last time I checked, telepathy was still an impossibility. You really want to die on a hill named "No way this account was actually the sock puppet of a seasoned forum member"?

I won't claim telepathy, but the account was opened in 2007, the account had over 18,000 posts, the person associated with the account sent me a photo of his Italian ID over PM, and nothing in the user notes suggests the Luciom account was anything other than the user's main account, so I'm pretty comfortable with my side of the wager.


by Rococo m

I won't claim telepathy, but the account was opened in 2007, the account had over 18,000 posts, the person associated with the account sent me a photo of his Italian ID over PM, and nothing in the user notes suggests the Luciom account was anything other than the user's main account, so I'm pretty comfortable with my side of the wager.

So you're saying you can be easily fooled by sending you legit looking stuff. Got it.

Still no comment on the fact that this 18k posts guy, who had the green "online" light next to his name, 24+ hours after his ban, would suddenly stop pouring his wisdom (in basically all fields imaginable) over us?


maybe I'm just captain obvious for pointing this out but a lot of you guys are really weird


by BobTheSlob m

So you're saying you can be easily fooled by sending you legit looking stuff. Got it.

Still no comment on the fact that this 18k posts guy, who had the green "online" light next to his name, 24+ hours after his ban, would suddenly stop pouring his wisdom (in basically all fields imaginable) over us?

If you're not already a reg there why not try unstuck politics? I mean, you called a mod, who is on your own side politically, a mentally ill freak over not getting the result you wanted over a particular poster. You'd find a lot more like minded individuals over there.

Edit: That's actually an unfair critique of the place, but it's a problem there - and here apparently.


ofc he posts at UP


by BobTheSlob m

So you're saying you can be easily fooled by sending you legit looking stuff. Got it.

Still no comment on the fact that this 18k posts guy, who had the green "online" light next to his name, 24+ hours after his ban, would suddenly stop pouring his wisdom (in basically all fields imaginable) over us?

I honestly don't know wtf your problem is.


by formula72 m

If you're not already a reg there why not try unstuck politics? I mean, you called a mod, who is on your own side politically, a mentally ill freak over not getting the result you wanted over a particular poster. You'd find a lot more like minded individuals over there.

Edit: That's actually an unfair critique of the place, but it's a problem there - and here apparently.

That's a bit harsh - the weirdo freaks got demodded on UP.


I have no idea what that forum is and at this point I’m too afraid to ask


Its a horrifically boring circle jerk. I'll check it out every once in a while and have never seen a single interesting point being made

Someone clipped Mason's post earlier today and a few of them had a wank. Kinda weird to not just make a post here, but thats how it goes


by checkraisdraw m

I have no idea what that forum is and at this point I’m too afraid to ask

Back when Wookie ran the forum someone compared Sarah Huckabee Sanders to ambergris (the highly valuable substance produced by sperm whales and used in perfumery) and Mat Sklansky shut the forum down for a few days and reopened it with Well Named as the mod. Many of the liberals who posted here then left and created their own splinter forum called Unstuck Politics.


by coordi m

Its a horrifically boring circle jerk. I'll check it out every once in a while and have never seen a single interesting point being made

Someone clipped Mason's post earlier today and a few of them had a wank. Kinda weird to not just make a post here, but thats how it goes

As I've said before, I do like some of the people there and I enjoy some of the "non politic" threads to talk about certain things with like-minded others.

My point is there is a few people here, who seem both extraordinarily unhappy posting here and unapproving of how this place operates, yet still feel compelled to change it to their liking while using a really strange tactic of just insulting people as much as they can as their strategy or something.

When all they need to do is accept that fact that this place isn't for them and that they can simply go somewhere else. It's just better for both parties.


by formula72 m

My point is there is a few people here, who seem both extraordinarily unhappy posting here and unapproving of how this place operates, yet still feel compelled to change it to their liking while using a really strange tactic of just insulting people as much as they can as their strategy or something. When all they need to do is accept that fact that this place isn't for them an

I'm with you on the silliness of just insulting people, but honestly, there aren't many places to go. Old school forums are sparse, and places like X and Reddit are overrun with bots and are terrible formats for having actual discussions. And I get that privately owned forums can do what they want, but it doesn't mean that what they do is good. Of all the fundamental liberal values, free speech is arguably the most important one and comprehensible outside of the legal context. Given that online forums are where most ideas are discussed these days, if the ideal isn't valued and reinforced, we might as well lose it altogether.


by zers m

I'm with you on the silliness of just insulting people, but honestly, there aren't many places to go. Old school forums are sparse, and places like X and Reddit are overrun with bots and are terrible formats for having actual discussions. And I get that privately owned forums can do what they want, but it doesn't mean that what they do is good. Of all the fundamental liberal va

Sure, it's impossible to have a perfect forum for everyone. This place has a nice little mixture of lefties and righties, and a few far left and far right. And many of those are still able to argue in the same room with each other.

The problem with having a forum of only one side is that it consistently reaffirms peoples' political takes and makes it damn near impossible for those people to see where they may not be as right as they think they are. Because i think both right wingers and left wingers are dead wrong on certain issues and I think a place like this offers a better opportunity to kind of see the world from another perspective at least.


White men righties and white men lefties. Hardly a variety iyam.


I hear there’s some bears on that forum too


by weeeez m

He obviously knows he's unbanned.
Pretty sure he has and alt account and he is satisfied with it.

1. Why would it be obvious?

2. If Lucy had an alt account, it would take like two posts by it for us to figure out it's him.


by Crossnerd m

White men righties and white men lefties. Hardly a variety iyam.

In the off chance you can find a smart and articulate lady interested in discussing politics, then please encourage her to post here.


by checkraisdraw m

I have no idea what that forum is and at this point I’m too afraid to ask

After I got permabanned from here, I posted there for a bit until THEY permabanned me.

Reply...