The murder of Charlie Kirk
Can we all admit that the majority of extremism is coming from the left over the last handful of years?
Apparently they j
We now have Megyn Kelly and Tucker Carlson joining in on the criticism of Netanyahu and his self-serving agenda when it comes to misrepresenting Charlie Kirk and his legacy.And it is so amazing to see how these voices are way more amplified and followed compared to anything the mainstream media puts out. And everyone can see the losers and trolls who react by saying oh you hate
Netanyahu is obviously exploiting the Kirk assassination. His tour on talk shows discussing the Kirk death is a bad look. You would think he would be focused on the war. Obviously, Bibi thinks what he is doing is important for his country. I can't blame a guy for doing what he thinks needs to be done. Also, it's weird how the conspiracy right finds this to be such an important topic. I get covering it but holy moly my MAGA friends are blowing up my phone with YouTube, Gateway Pundit, or Tumbler videos about it. People need to chill out. Get away from the social media and get out of the house.
I’m not saying this is a conspiracy and I hate to be seen siding with Victor on potential conspiracy talk but that language is definitely not how a normal human talks
If I ever referred to my wife as ‘my love’ she’ll assume I was cheating on her
I know several people that call both their partner and their children "my love". Do I find it weird? Yes. Do I find it unusual? No.
People who are clearly deep in the Rightwing echo chambers and associated with Rightwing groups go off and kill multiple innocent people never win the terrorist organization tag for any Rightwing groups. The KKK is allowed to exist. All the militias Tim McVeigh was in are allowed to keep existing.
There has been so much Rightwing killing of innocent people just for being of a certain race or ethnicity compared to what? 1 guy on the Right killed by someone with a super confused political identity? And there are calls to go after anyone espousing Leftist views anywhere?
Explain to me how this isn't massive hypocrisy. How are people saying the Left is violent when CLEARLY by a ratio of about 1000-1 the Right is more murderous? And anyone can list out the Rightwing murders with a simple Wikipedia search.
And people are getting fired for saying Charlie Kirk wasn't the nicest guy? How is that not a slam dunk wrongful termination suit? You can't fire people for calling some racist hatemonger what he was, not legally anyway.
lmao right-wingers are sick puppies who are all getting money boners over how they can grift off of Kirk’s death. Uh-mazin!
It's actually credible that Kirk was pressured by both sides on the right , given Israel support is majoritarian among republicans but antisemites like Tucker exist .
Kirk has always pushed for as big a tent as possible (as he correctly understood that winning elections is the utmost moral imperative above all to protect at least some of his values).
Big tent problems that plague democrats since forever are now developing among republicans, nothing strange there.
Calling a racist a racist is not hate speech. Demagogues of hate are not a protected class in this country. Are these reports of people being fired for dissing Charlie Kirk even real? You are just giving these people money because they can sue their employer for wrongful termination.
People who are clearly deep in the Rightwing echo chambers and associated with Rightwing groups go off and kill multiple innocent people never win the terrorist organization tag for any Rightwing groups. The KKK is allowed to exist. All the militias Tim McVeigh was in are allowed to keep existing.There has been so much Rightwing killing of innocent people just for being of a ce
Every time an immigrant let in by the left, which the right would have never wanted in, commits any act of violence, that's leftist political violence.
Every time black people commit acts of violence on people of other races for reasons that are at least partially related with their belief in "racial oppression", that's leftist political violence.
Every time a criminal which rightwing people would have wanted in jail and leftist policies or judges let out of jail commits any act of violence, that's leftist political violence.
A. It seems like exactly the kind of cringe thing a 22-year-old would say.B. You expected the brain-pilled Mormon dipshit who decided to carve inscrutable memes onto bullets and murder a podcaster would write like a perfectly normal human being? This is Deuces 9/11-grade idiocy, next you'll be posting yootoobes and telling me it's scientifically impossible for a human to make t
The thing is, if this were just something the government put out then sure they could say whatever they want up to a point. The trans ideology thing for example, though I imagine the court even then would distinguish between good faith but wrong assessments and the government completely making up text conversations, but the government can't lie in an indictment without getting the case thrown out. I know there's not a lot of reason to trust the Trump administration, but making up evidence, evidence that's going to relatively easy to verify one way or another, would just be asking for trouble from the prosecutor's standpoint.
Every time an immigrant let in by the left, which the right would have never wanted in, commits any act of violence, that's leftist political violence. Every time black people commit acts of violence on people of other races for reasons that are at least partially related with their belief in "racial oppression", that's leftist political violence.Every time a criminal which rig
What about a poor Mexican that a farmer wants to let in to milk this cows, but a suburbanite doesn't because of whatever reason?
Is that farmer political violence?
Calling a racist a racist is not hate speech. Demagogues of hate are not a protected class in this country. Are these reports of people being fired for dissing Charlie Kirk even real? You are just giving these people money because they can sue their employer for wrongful termination.
You understand in the USA you can fire someone for his political opinion right? that's not a protected class.
The left fired people because they donated to rittenhouse defense.
And people are getting fired for saying Charlie Kirk wasn't the nicest guy? How is that not a slam dunk wrongful termination suit? You can't fire people for calling some racist hatemonger what he was, not legally anyway.
I get some people not agreeing with Charlie Kirk's politics or not liking him. But I don't get how any honest person can call him a racist or hatemonger other than they are told that's what he was.
The thing is, if this were just something the government put out then sure they could say whatever they want up to a point. The trans ideology thing for example, though I imagine the court even then would distinguish between good faith but wrong assessments and the government completely making up text conversations, but the government can't lie in an indictment without getting
This was the indictment done by state attorneys in Utah (i linked to it), Trump admin had nothing to do with it.
It's actually credible that Kirk was pressured by both sides on the right , given Israel support is majoritarian among republicans but antisemites like Tucker exist .Kirk has always pushed for as big a tent as possible (as he correctly understood that winning elections is the utmost moral imperative above all to protect at least some of his values).Big tent problems that plague
Tucker, Fuentes, Candace, Posobiec, and the entire TPUSA movement is trying to capitalize on the moment to get money and viewers. They’re literally turning him into the George Floyd of the right, complete with the blatant grift.
Every time an immigrant let in by the left, which the right would have never wanted in, commits any act of violence, that's leftist political violence. Every time black people commit acts of violence on people of other races for reasons that are at least partially related with their belief in "racial oppression", that's leftist political violence.Every time a criminal which rig
Nobody defines political violence this way but ok. 👍
And people are getting fired for saying Charlie Kirk wasn't the nicest guy? How is that not a slam dunk wrongful termination suit? You can't fire people for calling some racist hatemonger what he was, not legally anyway.
People can only sue for wrongful termination if the reason they were terminated relates to a protected class/protected activity. Political activity is not protected with respect to employment. (This is for at will employment)
Now if you have an employment contract that’s different.
Tucker, Fuentes, Candace, Posobiec, and the entire TPUSA movement is trying to capitalize on the moment to get money and viewers. They’re literally turning him into the George Floyd of the right, complete with the blatant grift.
Nobody defines political violence this way but ok. ��
Tucker and Owens are already monumentally popular …way more followed than pretty much anyone else on the right. Both are very wealthy with everything to lose and nothing to gain.
Tucker is not a far right wing crank. He just hosted Cenk Uygur from the young Turks on his podcast last night.
There it is, the worst take possible on this situation
Really should just fine people with bad takes instead of firing them. What if they were perfectly good at their job, but bad at posting?
Tucker and Owens are already monumentally popular …way more followed than pretty much anyone else on the right. Both are very wealthy with everything to lose and nothing to gain.
Tucker is not a far right wing crank. He just hosted Cenk Uygur from the young Turks on his podcast last night.
Cenk is on his right-wing fellatio tour, and just was hanging out with Charlie Kirk as “one of the good ones”. Tucker hanging out with a grifter who is trying to gain a shred of clout himself after the Kirk assassination isn’t exactly surprising.
Cenk is there to play the role of “the left has gone too far”.
As for your analysis of their motives, they absolutely have a lot to gain. Kirk was a very popular figure and his audience will go somewhere. The rich don’t get rich by ignoring a good business opportunity.
People who are clearly deep in the Rightwing echo chambers and associated with Rightwing groups go off and kill multiple innocent people never win the terrorist organization tag for any Rightwing groups. The KKK is allowed to exist. All the militias Tim McVeigh was in are allowed to keep existing.There has been so much Rightwing killing of innocent people just for being of a ce
the proud boys are labeled a terrorist organization and were forced to shut down in canada
Really should just fine people with bad takes instead of firing them. What if they were perfectly good at their job, but bad at posting?
Can we let employers decide what to use to judge if an employee is a good fit or not? they are the people who pay they should have complete discretion in who to hire and keep with no third parties ever having a say at all (yes i am against *all* anti-discrimination laws in private hiring).
Now we should discuss what public employers should do... and that should be decided by voters ofc
Those all seem like ordinary phrases.
Again, though, the roommate is definitely in on the conspiracy, right?
I think the roommate definitely committed a crime and is cooperating in exchange for not being charged. Right out of the gate they were framing this as a leftist hit job. And yet when they have the perfect candidate in the roommate to show how one of their own pure as driven snow kids can be quickly radicalized by the left, they don't do anything like throw the book at him. Instead, just the opposite; they seem ready to pin a medal on him. Which in itself is weird because all of the evidence in the indictment they attribute to him, they could have just as well obtained through search warrants. So maybe more along the lines of an evidentiary conspiracy.
