[extracted] New(?) 9-11 stuff
KSM got a plea deal. The guy who supposedly masterminded the 9/11 attacks is not getting the death penalty.
If you still
No axial rotation.
Primarily see
1) Michelson-Morley observational tests.
2) Lack of Coriolis deviation observed as bodies moving above Earth surface. Includes drop tests - null result.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
What did NASA say when you wrote to tell them about this?
If I go to the image gallery on NASA's website, I can find a million images purportedly taken from space of what appears to be a spherical Earth. NASA must know those images are fake, which means there must be a conspiracy to disseminate those fake images to the world. Dozens of people who have been in space have talked about the wonder of observing our blue "marble" from spa
They tell you, these are composites.
The only true image claimed is blue marble.
"Of course, the original Blue Marble image is actually a photograph—not a composite view."
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
They tell you, these are composites.
The only true image claimed is blue marble.
JFC, you are being a dishonest little **** again, I linked you to a section of their site where they upload non composite pictures daily. Several a day for the last 10 years, from different points in the satellite's orbit, so you can see all the continents and oceans and everything. Thousands of pictures. All you said was that this was irreconcilable with horizon dip and hand waved it away, and now you're pretending like the conversation never happened.
Here are a bunch of non-composite pictures of earth taken daily:
Latest one posted is from 2 days ago: https://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/?date=2026-02...
Fake?
[QUOTE=NASA]
EPIC (Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera) is a 10-channel spectroradiometer (317 – 780 nm) onboard NOAA’s DSCOVR (Deep Space Climate Observatory) spacecraft. EPIC provides 10 narrow band spectral images of the entire sunlit face of Earth using a 2048x2048 pixel CCD (Charge Coupled Device) detector coupled to a 30-cm aperture Cassegrain telescope (Figure 1).
....
The EPIC instrument has a field of view (FOV) of 0.62 degrees, which is sufficient to image the entire Earth, which has a nominal size of 0.5 degrees.
[/QUOTE]
Here it is, in all its non composite glory:
And two weeks of detention for you for lying.
since I'm only reading 30% of Billy's posts I may be incorrect but didn't he mention a few posts ago that he isn't a flat earther in the traditional sense? If not, then what is the shape of the earth? I know we'll never get an image of what he believes but maybe a description?Crossnerd touches on my biggest complaint with a non-spherical earth which is the fact we can calcula
Yes, this is why it is preferred.
As an analogy (quite a weak one):
John Dalton's uniform sphere atom. A debunked theory by experiment but it has not lost its predictive power because of that. The particle model of matter needs nothing more than Dalton's atom.
Heliocentrism will continue to have predictive power even with confirmation earth is flat.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
JFC, you are being a dishonest little **** again, I linked you to a section of their site where they upload non composite pictures daily. Several a day for the last 10 years, from different points in the satellite's orbit. Thousands of pictures. All you said was that this was irreconcilable with horizon dip and hand waved it away, and now you're pretending like the conversation
Here it is, in all its non composite glory:
And two weeks of detention for you for lying.[/QUOTE]
Happy to retract, sir, if you can show where they say non-composite.
And yes i forgot the conversation.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Here it is, in all its non composite glory:
Happy to retract, sir, if you can show where they say non-composite.
And yes i forgot the conversation.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
For the now third time, here are the specs and a description of the camera:
https://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/about/epic
It says explicitly here that the entire sunlit face of the Earth fits into the field of view of the camera. It describes and gives examples of what the camera sees, and what post processing they do on the images, which is entirely for colour enhancement. They do not stitch any images together.
Here is the full fact sheet, which I won't even pretend to begin to understand:
Speaking of conspiracies...how is this pretend intense interest in flat earth nonsense not a sheeple conspiracy to soil this thread, especially in light of the Epstein files and what they said about 9/11?
There is no pretend interest in the possibility that the earth is flat. This is transparently an exercise in mockery.
My point was that NASA must be engaging in a conspiracy because it is presenting pictures that would lead an average viewer to believe that the world is spherical when, in fact, it must know that the world is not spherical. In other words, one would expect someone with your views to believe that NASA's use of compositives in this way is affirmative evidence of a conspiracy.
There is no pretend interest in the possibility that the earth is flat. This is transparently an exercise in mockery.
Deuces doesn't recognise mockery because it's the only mode in which anyone ever interacts with him. He thinks that's normal and how everyone else interacts with each other.
For the now third time, here are the specs and a description of the camera:https://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/about/epicIt says explicitly here that the entire sunlit face of the Earth fits into the field of view of the camera. It describes and gives examples of what the camera sees, and what post processing they do on the images, which is entirely for colour enhancement. They do not s
"EPIC provides 10 narrow band spectral images of the entire sunlit face of Earth"
Sounds like composites to me.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
"EPIC provides 10 narrow band spectral images of the entire sunlit face of Earth"
Sounds like composites to me.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
If I have understood it correctly, this means that they overlay images taken at different wavelengths for colour enhancement, but the entire Earth is in the field of view is in each image. Calling these "composites" in the sense that the you are objecting to the others being composites, because the entire planet is not within the field of view of the camera, is the height of intellectual dishonesty.
Or explain to me like I'm five how overlaying 10 images of flat Earth on top of one another for colour enhancement changes its shape to look round, then.
You all don't get it. Billy is simply a detective, following the evidence wherever the horizon dip science leads him, and we are but Watsons to his Holmes. And if that place is the somewhat non traditional conclusion is that our home base is in fact a pancake on the back of a turtle, well, as Holmes said - "When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remain
Don't forget my detection of that delicious whiff of your cognitive dissonance.
Billy knows.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
If I have understood it correctly, this means that they overlay images taken at different wavelengths for colour enhancement, but the entire Earth is in the field of view is in each image. Calling these "composites" in the sense that the you are objecting to the others being composites, because the entire planet is not within the field of view of the camera, is the height of in
How would the satellite even operate over the flat earth. How would they get to the so called Lagrange point.
We are merely seeing whether they claim to regularly view earth in full. I dont think you have shown that satisfactorily.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
How would the satellite even operate over the flat earth. How would they get to the so called Lagrange point.
We are merely seeing whether they claim to regularly view earth in full. I dont think you have shown that satisfactorily.
Sent from my SM-A366B using Tapatalk
Which part of "the entire sunlit face of the Earth is within field of view" is "unsatisfactory" to you?
Have you ever taken a picture of a ball before? If the entire ball is within field of view of the camera, it looks round. Like a ball. You can perform this experiment yourself by standing over a ball and pointing a camera down at it. #TheMoreYouKnow #Science
Also, assuming that all these pictures are fake, why would NASA tell you that they are composites and throw doubt on their own conspiracy? Seems self defeating. Why not just leave out the composite part altogether? Or maybe they're levelling?
