Moderation Questions
Moderation Questions
8
zs

Moderation Questions

The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa

30 January 2024 at 05:27 AM
Reply...

24453 Replies

8
zs


by Gorgonian m

Because most conservatives are infuriatingly simple-minded, dishonest, and bigoted. There's only so much you can take.

I would posit you're mad because they don't take seriously your intellectual constructs. Most intellectual constructs are wrong (or not even wrong) in some way the person holding them doesn't appreciate...conservatism is about the wisdom of keeping what's tried and has worked pretty well. You see that as a kind of simple minded bigotry, but it's really a deep "dad" wisdom. The kind of thing that you realize sucking your 500th dick for your next hit...maybe dad was right about some things and I should have listened.

The only people you get mad at are the ones you're too simple and bigoted and dishonest yourself to understand.


The kind of thing that you realize sucking your 500th dick for your next hit...maybe dad was right about some things and I should have listened.

typically the Dad is the main person that should be blamed for that.


by pokerandfootlover m

conservatism is about the wisdom of keeping what's tried and has worked pretty well.

Modern conservatism in the US is not this at all. This is an outdated definition from a bygone era. If you think that the above definition bears any semblance of relation to "Trumpism", you are deluded.


by Victor m

typically the Dad is the main person that should be blamed for that.

Your misogyny in implying women can't make their own choices and are so hopelessly weak they are merely influenced into bad situations by their father's shortcomings is noted


right, I mean who even needs parents. they have no bearing on a kids future.


I mean, the African American community only has 25% of their biological fathers living at home, and they're doing very well. Anything where they're falling behind is because of structural racism still inherent in society.

So I think the data disagrees with you.


by pokerandfootlover m

I would posit .

Literally couldn't care less what you would posit.


Absolutely a previously banned poster.


by jjjou812 m

Absolutely a previously banned poster.

I think it could be Ins0 or itshotinvegas. (Ins0 not a banned account, but itshotinvegas is.)


Inso never left Milwaukee but was scared to get out of his car within city limits.

Not that I agree with his content, but this guy is much more intelligent than Itshot.


It's always puzzled me that people would make guesses at which previous poster someone is and name someone with a completely different posting style. Or even name someone borderline illiterate when the new poster clearly isn't or vice versa. Am I the only person who is cognizant of linguistic footprint or something?


cogniwhatnow


by d2_e4 m

It's always puzzled me that people would make guesses at which previous poster someone is and name someone with a completely different posting style. Or even name someone borderline illiterate when the new poster clearly isn't or vice versa. Am I the only person who is cognizant of linguistic footprint or something?

Yes.


They could both use LLMs to form posts but Poker+Foot and Pokerfan665 have extremely similar sentence structure (love dem dashes) and same MAGA dipshit politics. Also P+F's first post was in BFI trading thread where Pokerfan had previously and not since posted.

2nd guess would be Mongo using an LLM. His worldly knowledge having lived in 10 euro countries is similar to Mongo having friends in random countries with stereotypical names.

3rd guess is instead of of AI mods, new owners have AI posters driving content. Would explain Luciom.

Mongo if you want something to call SRM out for, him spazzing out and saying where's ICE when you need it over a latino Dodger player is def the way to attack him. This 'No You Are!' trying to frame him as a predator over consensual activity makes you seem even more creepy and incel.

Though SE posting is its own world where non woke hating is encouraged.

As a hardcore lurker just wanna say thanks for the entertainment everyone. TameDueces and Roccoco GOAT.

Luckbox, as someone who's lived in Mexico for 15 years and constantly has to deal with Americans' dogs tripping me up when Im jogging on beach, and who freak out when i kick them to get them away, you're what's wrong the world. Crazy how "theyve never done this before"!

FYI to ppl on vacation in Mexico, dogs off leash are strays and we have pretty wide latitude to protect ourselves against them.

Selfish *******s. It'd really be a shame if a car swerved to miss your dog and took you out.


Mongo if you want something to call SRM out for, him spazzing out and saying where's ICE when you need it over a latino Dodger player is def the way to attack him.

libs gonna lib


I’m quite certain I’ve said far far FAR worse in SE, though I respect the deep cut

Also **** the Doyers. I’ll die on that hill


by Victor m

libs gonna lib

I forget that behind the fake-edgy “antisemitism doesn’t real” you’re just some woke loser


ofc Im woke. thats why I hate the libs.


"Woke" was a modifier. It wasn't the head element of that grammatical structure.


by Rusemandingo m

itLuckbox, as someone who's lived in Mexico for 15 years and constantly has to deal with Americans' dogs tripping me up when Im jogging on beach, and who freak out when i kick them to get them away, you're what's wrong the world. Crazy how "theyve never done this before"!FYI to ppl on vacation in Mexico, dogs off leash are strays and we have pretty wide latitude to protect our

Ok go **** yourself.


by StoppedRainingMen m

I like the cut of this guy’s jib

.


Rusemandingo,

I hesitate to call it "fun," but you are more than welcome to join whatever this is.


by Rococo m

Rusemandingo,

I hesitate to call it "fun," but you are more than welcome to join whatever this is.

Something of a hybrid between a think tank and a nuthouse.

With most of the membership rotating roles between being participants and being onlookers throwing rotten fruit at the participants.


by corpus vile m

You claimed before that you were hoping a girl would get drunk so she could stay at your place with the strong implication that you were then gonna date rape her. That's about as sexually deviant and predatory as you can get. And far more predatory than SRM allegedly paying hookers to pee on them, assuming that's even true.

I said I cleaned and painted my place(Joke) in case this girl drinks too much she could stay with me. Would you guys prefer I make her drive drunk home? She’s a GUD (geographically undesirable) because she lives far away. I should be considered a hero. I never had intentions of doing anything to her that was against her will. It’s perfectly normal for a guy to hope he gets some when hanging out with a female he is attracted to.

SRM isn’t telling the whole story. The fact that he shared this story doesn’t creep you out?


by StoppedRainingMen m

I like the cut of this guy’s jib

Can you be any more cringe?

Reply...