Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
βCulturally, many Azerbaijanis might be considered βrudeβ according to Western standardsβ seems unproblematic.
Isn't that not showing a bias against Azerbaijani culture though? I mean, maybe we're the rude ones in their eyes and why should their culture have the onus thrust upon it to justify itself to shallow corporate consumer obsessed western culture, from their possible perspective?
How about "All cultures are as good as each other but you do tend to get bad apples everywhere who are probably bad apples due to circumstance or disadvantage or some other reason that doesn't include personal responsibility, and as a result, other bad apples will tend to generalise about cultures, due to them being bad apples which come from every culture, which doesn't reflect on the culture itself, but rather on the possibly-due- to-circumstance bad apples" instead??
Or simply post this if someone disparages a culture, it's less of a mouthful.
Isn't that not showing a bias against Azerbaijani culture though? I mean, maybe we're the rude ones in their eyes and why should their culture have the onus thrust upon it to justify itself to shallow corporate consumer obsessed western culture, from their possible perspective?
How about "All cultures are as good as each other....
Except dem Irish. ****s to a man.
BTW, that was obvs a joke. I even have like 2 Irish friends, assuming CV and I are friends.
Spoiler
They're the good ones, obviously.
I didn’t say I agreed with the statement, I was just demonstrating what I would consider acceptable
what about moroccans? surely we can find consensus on them
I prefer ganzas.
Do you agree with statements like this . There have been a few in the last week? Or is just a Left Wing pass again
That's entirely unacceptable. The sanctioned phraseology is: "consider making use of the ignore feature so that you don't find yourself vexed by this enthusiast of copulating with mothers and [while?] performing fellatio."
Lozen, I will not engage with you when you begin discussions with this tone.
Feel free to try again.
Ok this and another comment clearly go against the standards of the Politics section . The repeat offender and there was another one from a repeat offender may I ask why they would go unpunished ?
Put that mother****ingcocksucker on ignore.
Lozen, were you one of those kids at school who told on the other kids a lot?
Because he hasn't had the satisfaction yet of seeing you publicly flog d2 half to death with your bullwhip.
So because he wasn’t temp banned you assumed it was “unpunished”.
Do you need my assistance in helping you understand why that conclusion is fallacious?
Currently in the Witness Protection Program. Were you the guy that bullied all the kids that never agreed with you ?
Lol no. And I like how all you guys who get the reactions you deserve for your constant lying and bad faith posting characterise it as "disagreements". It's fooling exactly nobody except yourself.
So because he wasn’t temp banned you assumed it was “unpunished”.
Do you need my assistance in helping you understand why that conclusion is fallacious?
Rather than playing games and talking down to lozen in a passive-aggressive manner, you could just say that the person received an infraction/warning.
Rather than playing games and talking down to lozen in a passive-aggressive manner, you could just say that the person received an infraction/warning.
Mods ITF generally don't publicly announce or disclose moderation actions they've taken against posters, with the exception of lengthy or permanent bans. Lozen is a known whiner about mod bias and he is well aware that moderation actions are not limited to bans, so he is, as usual, posting in bad faith and, as usual, deserves the reaction he gets.
Lozen, I will not engage with you when you begin discussions with this tone.
Feel free to try again.
So because he wasnβt temp banned you assumed it was βunpunishedβ.
Do you need my assistance in helping you understand why that conclusion is fallacious?
So if you look at the above post you ask me to reword it as you did not like my implication and I did
Than your second you demean me in your comment .
