Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
The Bourgeoisie taste the wheel of justice.
Honestly, I have too. Anyway, I think the fix for your problem here is to continue to cry about it.
It is obvious he is just trying to get banned at this point.
Can a mod just do it already, so the thread can get back to “normal”?
I know you wish to once again discuss your penchant for child murder in peace :(
Mongidig and Dunyain, the majority of your temps have been for *racist statements*, not personal attacks.
Just want to clarify that when comparing yourselves to Karl.
Thanks.
LOL!
Literally burst out laughing at this. That's delicious.
I'd generally prefer less references to emotionally charged imagery and more discussion of politics, but I understand its a very emotionally charged subject for many. You guys do a great job of letting Karl come in, throw his tantrums, and continue on like nothing happened.
They do indeed do a swell job of ignoring the content of my anti-child murder posts on behalf of their shared goal to continue to advocate for the pro-child murder measures committed by Israel and the US.
Are tantrums WORSE or LESS WORSE than child murder, according to the standards of this forum? Y'all have never made this clear.
It's. it is from now on
Honestly, I have too. Anyway, I think the fix for your problem here is to continue to cry about it.I know you wish to once again discuss your penchant for child murder in peace :(LOL!Literally burst out laughing at this. That's delicious.They do indeed do a swell job of ignoring the content of my anti-child murder posts on behalf of their shared goal to continue to advocate f
Reading your posts is exhausting for everyone. If you continue to call everyone a murderer and reference child murder in all of your posts then your posts will continue to get moderated. Post more content without leaning so heavily into the rhetoric and you will have occasional leeway to post the rhetoric.
I think that the ability to weigh competing outcomes is what makes moral agency significant. If a person recognizes that both acting virtuously and failing to do so come with personal costs, then the decision making process becomes a meaningful exercise of agency.If decisions were strictly deterministic, i'd assume that you would see uniformity in the responses, yet we see mas
Yes and it's. part of why I claim we are all hedonists. Which has a totaally undeserved negative connotation.
Going to strongly disagree on the determinism point. Randomness makes no difference.
Honestly, I have too. Anyway, I think the fix for your problem here is to continue to cry about it.I know you wish to once again discuss your penchant for child murder in peace :(LOL!Literally burst out laughing at this. That's delicious.They do indeed do a swell job of ignoring the content of my anti-child murder posts on behalf of their shared goal to continue to advocate f
Tantrums are worse obviously but your tantrums are kinda bizarrely endearing actually
I find most of the kids in Spielberg films sickly repellant.
You all better stay away from goonies slander itt
Do you see this, d2_e4? It is anarchy.
And instead of discussing the dangers of double exclamation marks, the resident posters in this thread are now discussing which imaginary kids they want to kill.
We need leadership!
It's all bad. What we really need is a moderator who has read Jules Verne. Will you be my moderator?
Only ever read Around the World in 80 Days, in a kids' illustrated edition, a long time ago. Incidentally there's no big clock, or any clock at all, in the saloon of the Reform Club. (The saloon is what they call the big classical atrium that you come into as you go up the stairs from the entrance lobby.) Verne never visited the club and just put the clock in there for effect, as the gamblers assemble to see if Fogg's won the bet. It would be less dramatic if they simply checked their watches.
