Moderation Questions

It's pretty disturbing and telling that this is the joke you would decide to tell.

What’s the post telling you mongdig

You do understand that there are almost no surgical transitions on children right? I believe the rate is something like 2 per 100,000 TGD diagnoses (and 0 on children 15 and under). Don't pretend to have empathy towards a group of people whose lives you are actively destroying with your politics. That is cretinous behavior.

It is? Well you definitely seem disturbed, no arguments from me there.

It is interesting that the places in red on this map don't seem to have a male loneliness/loser epidemic. Seems like there might be a fairly simple fix to the problem if we ever decide it is warranted.

That being said, with some exceptions, this could also be a map for birthrates, where the countries in red are the only ones above replacement level. So quite possible mother nature will take care of things without us having to take any drastic actions. Demographics is destiny as they say.

Honest question. Why are you such a creep?

What is this map purporting to show? What does "most free" and "least free" mean for the purposes of this map?

I think you know the answer to that question already, Roc

What is the source for this claim?

Maybe I'm dense, but I really don't.

And I’m not sure what you mean by “fixing the problem”. Incels are natural selection. If you can’t adapt to a world where you actually have to attract women instead of forcing them to be with you, then the problem is you and you should not be bred with under any circumstances. That’s just evolution at work.

And it always concerns me when the most free market people suddenly want to switch back to communism when it comes to pussy. Grow up. You’re not meant to be in the gene pool long term.

It's probably true that men in the world's poorest countries don't spend a lot of time pondering whether Andrew Tate has cracked the code. But that doesn't prove much.

Hard to ague with that, but I'm sure our resident expert on evolution will nonetheless try.

gd I frequently forget he exists, so thanks for that.

It appears to be some bastardized version of the Freedom Index: https://worldpopulationreview.com/countr...

Anything showing Argentina as "least free" should be approached with healthy skepticism

Across the millennia, various studies found that approx 40% of men who reached the age of reproduction, didn't reproduce (20% of women).

There are occasional bottlenecks where that is a lot higher, and some moments when it's a tad lower.

There is nothing new about incels existing, and yes they will self-select (or will be selected) out of the gene pool.

What's unique with close to no precedent in human history is the recently ever-raising % of women who reach the age of reproduction and don't have children. We aren't yet as "completly unprecedented historical record throught time and geography" but pretty close.

That's self-selection as well, but it comes with the "slight" problem of inverted demographic pyramids if it prolongs in time (and population reduction, but that per se isn't necessarily a problem).

Now the ball is on the collectivist, leftist side, because at the end the libertarian right has a solution about how to fix an excessive number of old dependants who can't provide for themselves: let them die and move on.

I didn't expect crossnerd to favor a model of society where very rich people a la Musk have 10+++ children and a growing portion of normal men have none, with a growing portion of women having none as well, as it's very much antithetical to inequality reduction (it actually increases inequality), but at the end that can work as well (if we give up on welfare for old age and the disabled, that is).

The claim that none of those countries have a male loneliness epidemic is pretty bold. I'd love to know where it came from.

Much bolder to claim the loser epidemic isn’t worldwide

I highly doubt that Dun would disagree that attractiveness is not based almost entirely on genetics. its a pretty effed up viewpoint.

The **** does that have to do with anything anyone said?

Can we get a Eugenics Containment Thread for Kelhus and his incessant claptrap?

literally this

I am pretty sure that our "resident expert on evolution" would absolutely agree with these povs.

You should set up some sort of automatic reply that uses this on all of Victor's posts.

I still have no idea what the **** you are trying to say. Take your time and use your words to formulate some sort of coherent point. Or don't, I don't really care.