Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
Ye so obvious, you get caught by your wife cheating and she files for divorce immediately after that, but it would be moronic to presume the reason she divorces you is that you were cheating sure.
High IQ democrats for the win
Right. The other poster was correct that you simply don't understand the fallacy. We don't even know if the shooter knew about the vote you claim caused the assassination, but that doesn't impact your case at all.
Ye so obvious, you get caught by your wife cheating and she files for divorce immediately after that, but it would be moronic to presume the reason she divorces you is that you were cheating sure.
High IQ democrats for the win
Let’s say you cheat on your wife and then the next day you get killed by a mugger. I guess the mugger must have killed you for cheating on your wife by this logic.
what about Timothy Mcveigh?
what about the trump supporter who shot up a synagogue?
what about the massacre of a gay club in Orlando?
The list goes on and on.
The idea that the right wing is less violent than the left wing is not one based on reality.
People on both extremes are probably equally as nutty. I do think that there is more right wing media to be consumed which may motivate more right wing violence. That being said, I'm actually shocked that there hasn't been right wing groups attacking the protestors/rioters.
There was never a year in the last 50+ when political violence was remotely more common on the right than on the left. Not even vaguely close in the first world.That includes Jan 6, basically the only significant rightwing violent episode on decades.Claiming most political violence has been rightwing recently is like claiming men can get pregnant.It is such an "in your face" de
You are so ****ing deluded about some things that it's not worth discussing those things with you. I'm not sure that you are even mentally capable of formulating the mens rea to be lying about these things, you just live in a world of your own that doesn't resemble reality.
what about Timothy Mcveigh?
what about the trump supporter who shot up a synagogue?
what about the massacre of a gay club in Orlando?
The list goes on and on.
The idea that the right wing is less violent than the left wing is not one based on reality.
The problem is that single episodes never build up to be on the same size as multiple riots.
Take the northern Ireland riots against unlimited immigration. Those are rightwing riots, rightwing mass political violence.
One riot is thousands of criminals doing political violence in a way that changes life for a lot of people.
Now you need tens of those per year for 50 years in the USA to start coming close to the left. You had none other than jan6.
There was never a year in the last 50+ when political violence was remotely more common on the right than on the left. Not even vaguely close in the first world.That includes Jan 6, basically the only significant rightwing violent episode on decades.Claiming most political violence has been rightwing recently is like claiming men can get pregnant.It is such an "in your face" de
.
Lol you taking the piss?
You really comparing BLM and the yellow vests to these?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_o...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Beh...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christchur...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_C...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dylann_Roo...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryno-Skach...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_S...
https://www.cfr.org/timeline/far-right-t...
Let's look at your own country
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_A...
(^^Your country actually released these two whackos after they served a mere 20 odd years)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piazza_Fon...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordine_Nuo...
Would you like me to provide more examples? Here y'go
https://www.csis.org/analysis/escalating...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/j...
Center for Strategic and International Studies analysis of domestic terrorist incidents found majority have come from far right
Again this is just flat out lying on your part, you can't possibly be this misinformed.
It's called "Freedom of speech". The authorities serve the people, so when they evidently racially profile American people and said Americans get rather annoyed at this, then the authorities are just gonna have to suck it in, aren't they?
Maybe if the authorities stop racially profiling people then they won't be subjected to such ire.
It's called "Freedom of speech". The authorities serve the people, so when they evidently racially profile American people and said Americans get rather annoyed at this, then the authorities are just gonna have to suck it in, aren't they?
Maybe if the authorities stop racially profiling people then they won't be subjected to such ire.
I've never seen someone get such a boner for "doing what the authorities say" as this guy. He's the perfect dumb little fascist thug that "the authorities" like Trump and Hitler and co love to sic on their enemies. He is probably even stupid enough to think that it make him a good person.
I've never seen someone get such a boner for "doing what the authorities say" as this guy. He's the perfect dumb little fascist thug that "the authorities" like Trump and Hitler and co love to sic on their enemies. He is probably even stupid enough to think that it make him a good person.
I'm convinced he's a troll, nobody could be this thick.
It’s common for incels to be attracted to icons of apparent power like authoritarian leaders and toxic social media influencers because it compensates a little for the lack of respect they’re given by others in real life.
I've never seen someone get such a boner for "doing what the authorities say" as this guy. He's the perfect dumb little fascist thug that "the authorities" like Trump and Hitler and co love to sic on their enemies. He is probably even stupid enough to think that it make him a good person.
I honestly don't think this is a good read. I don't think Luciom is personally enamored with following rules or conforming his personal behavior to authority.
I think that he has a near pathological attraction to the abstract idea of a few powerful people imposing their will on the masses using any means necessary, including violence. It's a very chilling vision of the great man theory of history. I don't know how much thought Luciom has given to how he would be treated in such a world. He probably imagines that it would go something like, "The powerful people in my ideal world would be superior. I am pretty special myself, and I certainly don't care at all about the masses. Therefore I can expect the powerful people to protect my interests."
I would argue that my version of Luciom is darker than your version.
I honestly don't think this is a good read. I don't think Luciom is personally enamored with following rules or conforming his personal behavior to authority. I think that he has a near pathological attraction to the abstract idea of a few powerful people imposing their will on the masses using any means necessary, including violence. It's a very chilling vision of the great
Ya this
Remember, this is the same guy who believes if you don’t disperse from a protest in 10 minutes you should be executed on sight
This guy craves blood in service of his idea of order. And I sincerely believe he fetishizes the idea of being the one pulling the trigger
Edit: mongoloid is definitely what d2 is describing
Ya this
Remember, this is the same guy who believes if you don’t disperse from a protest in 10 minutes you should be executed on sight
This guy craves blood in service of his idea of order. And I sincerely believe he fetishizes the idea of being the one pulling the trigger
If it's just a "protest", then dispersion isn't needed in the first place.
Ya this
Remember, this is the same guy who believes if you don’t disperse from a protest in 10 minutes you should be executed on sight
This guy craves blood in service of his idea of order. And I sincerely believe he fetishizes the idea of being the one pulling the trigger
Edit: mongoloid is definitely what d2 is describing
I thought there was someone else in addition to Land 'O Lakes who enjoyed using terminology considered demeaning to handicapped folks. Forget it was you, though.
I honestly don't think this is a good read. I don't think Luciom is personally enamored with following rules or conforming his personal behavior to authority. I think that he has a near pathological attraction to the abstract idea of a few powerful people imposing their will on the masses using any means necessary, including violence. It's a very chilling vision of the great
I think d2 was referring to mongidig.
That is correct, I was of course talking about the mong.
I do not think he is a troll. If he's just playing stupid that would be an Oscar worthy perfromance.
I love the energy: get banned for lying about political violence and then come right back the next day and spin even bigger, more absurd lies. Always keep attacking, never take a step back.
Lucio's only mistake is conceding that Jan 6 was right wing violence, why not blame BLM for that as well? Just keep turboposting lies.
I don’t respect a single thing about Lucy, but I do appreciate that you are always gonna know exactly what you’re going to get from him
