Time dilation and the only place it can't reach
The only place that can't be reached by the time dilation is the difficulty level of this time-based poker game. It will remain unchanged no matter how big the time dilation is. The graphic #1 shows the hexagonal scheme which explains this phenomenon perfectly, although first you'll need to get familiar with the rules of my OMEGATRON game. It takes about 1 minute to play this game, so you can try that, too. Any 1/100 sec. stopwatch + a little bit of practice and you'll be ready to go. But even if you don't decide to play it, it still is VERY interesting. I hope to have a serious science & poker math discussion here. I uploaded 7 graphics below in this post although some are hidden under the "spoiler" tags. Of course all 3 games use classic poker hand rankings. Let me know what you think.
TIME DILATION is the difference in elapsed time as measured by two clocks, either because of a relative velocity between them (special relativity), or a difference in gravitational potential between their locations (general relativity). When unspecified, "time dilation" usually refers to the effect due to velocity.
After compensating for varying signal delays resulting from the changing distance between an observer and a moving clock (i.e. Doppler effect), the observer will measure the moving clock as ticking more slowly than a clock at rest in the observer's own reference frame. There is a difference between observed and measured relativistic time dilation - the observer does not visually perceive time dilation in the same way that they measure it. In addition, a clock that is close to a massive body (and which therefore is at lower gravitational potential) will record less elapsed time than a clock situated farther from the same massive body (and which is at a higher gravitational potential).
These predictions of the theory of relativity have been repeatedly confirmed by experiment, and they are of practical concern, for instance in the operation of satellite navigation systems such as GPS and Galileo.
Source: Wikipedia
Software concept (3 graphics):
Spoiler
Cards (with seconds):
Spoiler
Author: Grzegorz Jakubowicz
I think he would say: "God doesn't play dice" then he would go back to his lab and slam the door.
Math uses a variable "x" in functions and equations. I wonder if the value of "x" can always be precisely defined (found) or perhaps there are some exceptions where "x" can't be precisely specified ?
OMEGATRON has "the unknown factor" also, so I just wonder if math accepts any cases of situations where something will remain unknown ?
I think this scheme is much better than the first one. I'm sure that the game's difficulty level is time dilation resistant, although I still don't know if it's full 100% resistance. It will be extremely difficult to measure and prove.
There's been cases where a result was dismissed because no one could follow it. Only years later someone saw what was going on and showed the proof was valid. Who knows? Maybe you're on to something but it will take someone smarter than me to see it. Good luck.
PairTheBoard
There's been cases where a result was dismissed because no one could follow it. Only years later someone saw what was going on and showed the proof was valid. Who knows? Maybe you're on to something but it will take someone smarter than me to see it. Good luck.
PairTheBoard
Ok, thanks a lot! Your question has already helped me because it was right on point. Let's wait for a real math-geometry-poker-physics wizard 😀
And the calculations I've just posted seem to be just fine ! They show multiple ways of possible access to the pyramid's content. The 72=72 result is correct, although some minor corrections will have to be made to the multipliers (black color). I'll upload some new graphics soon.
"Repeatedly confirmed by experiment" is bandied around far too often. E.g., the muon count is higher than expected because muons be like we only been gone a microsecond! physicists be like "you have been gone for ages wtf are y'all doing down here?" I doubt classifies as an experiment in a meaningful sense.
Is Dominos running any specials?
This should answer your question. And it might be a historic moment 
Something like a mathematical curse that can't be broken 😀
What is your favourite kind of pizza? Can we make a pizza themed game
Also, I've been staring at the first graphic trying to figure out the math. Where do you get the numbers?
What is your favourite kind of pizza? Can we make a pizza themed game
Also, I've been staring at the first graphic trying to figure out the math. Where do you get the numbers?
No pizza in this thread please 😀
The numbers explain how many green and red spheres are in each category when counted all combos together. For example when you have "edge x6" it means the pyramid has 6 edges and each one contains 2 red spheres and 1 green. So you multiply this by "x6" and you get 12 red spheres and 6 green spheres.
Let's see the final version with all corrections (all precisely verified many times):
>>>EDGE x6: red=12 green=6
>>>SIDE x4: red=12 green=12
>>>SMALL PYRAMID x4: red=4 green=12
>>>VECTOR x48: red=12 green=36
>>>SINGLE SPHERE x10: red=4 green=6
>>>PEAK POINT x4: red=4 green=0
>>>SMALL TRIANGLE x20: red=12 green=48
>>>COLOR LINK x24: red=12 green=24
Green spheres have value of 0,5 because they are doubled. When you add all numbers you get 72=72.
There are eight categories and there's nothing more. All are regular and patterned. They represent all possible ways of getting into the pyramid's content.
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦
Software concept graphics:
MAIN MENU:
Spoiler
ALPHATRON:
Spoiler
BETATRON:
Spoiler
OMEGATRON:
Spoiler
STATISTICS:
Spoiler
RULES:
Spoiler
ABOUT:
Spoiler
PYRAMID SCHEME:
Spoiler
curving spacetime in a way that affects all measurements of time and space near the black hole.
≠
Time dilation due to relativity has no effect on your experience of time.
PairTheBoard
Back in the day Henri Bergson accused Einstein of slipping metaphysics into the science for just that reason. He argued that the physicist's measurement of time is something different than the way humans experience the passage of time and thought we should use the term 'duration' to describe the experience of time to prevent the conflation.
[QUOTE=google]Ringo Starr is widely considered to have excellent timekeeping as a drummer, with many experts stating he was able to keep a very consistent tempo throughout songs, making him a reliable beatkeeper for The Beatles, even without the use of modern click tracks; essentially, he "kept good time" on the drums. [/QUOTE]
Replace the stop watch or clock with Ringo keeping the time. He's not going to experience going into sloth mode, nor will the people around him. Likewise if we sync up two good drummers and set them off in planes circling the earth in opposite directions: no time dilation; they'll still be in sync when their paths cross.
≠
Back in the day Henri Bergson accused Einstein of slipping metaphysics into the science for just that reason. He argued that the physicist's measurement of time is something different than the way humans experience the passage of time and thought we should use the term 'duration' to describe the experience of time to prevent the conflation.
Replace the stop watch or clock with Ringo keeping the time. He's not going to experience going into sloth mode, nor will the people around him. Likew
Interesting. I agree with your "drummer experiment".
I think this "getting closer to a black hole" thing is about time measurement made by some sort of device. So only the devices will go slower, while human's perception of all actions will remain the same. So, if my average time of eating a sandwich is 3 minutes, when I eat it in a spaceship near a black hole, it will still be 3 minutes, but not on the watch I'll be wearing. I'm only not sure whether this refers to only electronic devices, or maybe automatic watches, too.
That's how I see gravitational time dilation in space.
Interesting. I agree with your "drummer experiment".
I think this "getting closer to a black hole" thing is about time measurement made by some sort of device. So only the devices will go slower, while human's perception of all actions will remain the same. So, if my average time of eating a sandwich is 3 minutes, when I eat it in a spaceship near a black hole, it will still be 3 minutes, but not on the watch I'll be wearing. I'm only not sure whether this refers to only electronic devices, or ma
.... then it would take you about 15 minutes to eat one on the moon per the hourglass you took with you.
That's how I see gravitational time dilation in space.
E=m(v^2), where v is the velocity of space.
That's roughly how I see space.
The 3D pyramid scheme (post #36, last graphic) is driving me crazy. I've been analyzing it like 80 times and still can't find the final explanation. The scheme does prove that basically 3 = 4 when you visualize it through the 10 sphere pyramid.
But I'm suspecting that these 8 structural factors represent the ways our vision / eyes see different modules of the pyramid. Modules are regular and patterned and there are 8 types of them. So not only human brain is looking for patterns, but also our eyes. Both are connected, but it's the eye that moves and focuses on certain module.
This could mean that we SEE this perfect balance (72 = 72) with the help of our brain which adds all 8 factors and possible combinations together. And this would mean that we can't perceive or prove perfect balance between pros (green) and cons (black) if we are not looking at the pyramid. If we close our eyes or look in some other direction, the balance disappears.
This sounds crazy, but it somehow just makes sense. Human vision is very much connected with perceiving space and distance, so maybe this explains why time dilation is connected with the POINT OF VIEW.
