Capitol attack and 6th of January hearings
VP was rushed off the floor by Secret service.
Senate is on lockdown.
Terrorists have breached barricades and appear to be
I think it's the stairs Biden has a problem with not the plane.
Unsurprising that PB just cruises right on by the list of just some of his absurd assertions/predictions that have come to nothing.
Standard.
With respect to the OP we have to stay on the topic of the thread.
There was not an insurrection. How were the protestors, who were protesting to ask their government who are supposed to be represent their people, to take 10 days before certifying the election to examine and investigate the tens of thousands of complaints of voter fraud that occurred during an election type that's never happened before because of a plandemic. People were showing up to vote and being told they already voted, there are surveillance cameras showing the same people over and over again dumping paper ballots in drop boxes by the hundreds at a time (see the documentary 2000 mules, the evidence is laid out on video). The media who's saying this was an insurrection are controlled by the same people who set up this insurrection to gain public support of an opposition against Trump.
I can't really talk about things I'm involved in (some because I can't and most because I prefer not to since it needs to be discussed about in steps) but I do have however some very new info that has to be kept on the dl and total top secret because I'm rly not allowed to talk about it but I will:
Spoiler
I just found out resident biden has a new AF1!!!!
oh I get it. He's just trolling.
DB2000 still my favorite poster.
In September, six Republican and unaffiliated Colorado
voters filed suit in Denver to keep Trump off the state’s ballot.
They included Norma Anderson, the former Republican majority leader of the
Colorado Senate and House; Krista Kafer, a conservative columnist for The Denver Post;
and Claudine Schneider, a former Republican U.S. representative.
a key part of the ruling — and one that is far less positive for the GOP front-runner
What the court did not do was overturn, or even substantively dispute,
the determination that the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol was an insurrection
and that Donald Trump incited that insurrection. This is not an exoneration.
The Supreme Court did not address this key issue, and we contend that this silence is important.
It is hard at this point to escape the conclusion that Trump engaged in insurrection.
Trump tried to keep himself in power after losing an election, he has since doubled down.
He has defended insurrectionists, threatened the Constitution and
declared his intention to move the country in authoritarian directions.
In September, six Republican and unaffiliated Colorado
voters filed suit in Denver to keep Trump off the state’s ballot.
They included Norma Anderson, the former Republican majority leader of the
Colorado Senate and House; Krista Kafer, a conservative columnist for The Denver Post;
and Claudine Schneider, a former Republican U.S. representative.
a key part of the ruling — and one that is far less positive for the GOP front-runner
What the court did not do was overturn, or even substantively disput
This is a stupid opinion piece. It's true that the SCOTUS did not take on the question of whether Trump engaged in an insurrection, but that's because it wasn't remotely necessary to the decision.
Put another way, even if all nine justices had believed that Trump did (or did not) not engage in an insurrection, it is unlikely that the Court would have touched this issue.
So Trump did request national guard troops to protect the Capitol on Jan 6. But (surprise, surprise) the evidence was suppressed by the Jan 6 Committee. Hardly the actions of an insurrectionist I would have thought.
Former Rep. Liz Cheney’s January 6 Committee suppressed evidence that President Donald Trump pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the nation’s capital, a previously hidden transcript obtained by The Federalist shows.
Cheney and her committee falsely claimed they had “no evidence” to support Trump officials’ claims the White House had communicated its desire for 10,000 National Guard troops. In fact, an early transcribed interview conducted by the committee included precisely that evidence from a key source. The interview, which Cheney attended and personally participated in, was suppressed from public release until now.
Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s first transcribed interview with the committee was conducted on January 28, 2022. In it, he told Cheney and her investigators that he overheard White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows push Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as many National Guard troops as she needed to protect the city.
He also testified President Trump had suggested 10,000 would be needed to keep the peace at the public rallies and protests scheduled for January 6, 2021. Ornato also described White House frustration with Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller’s slow deployment of assistance on the afternoon of January 6, 2021.
Bullshit on its face
If trump never intended anything resembling a riot or insurrection , but just peaceful protest , why the needs of 10000 nationals guard troops in advance ?
Seem he knew in advance what kinda of people would end up there ….
We won't have to worry about that again in the future, with the agitated ants/ jihadis of vanilla Isis having shown their true dementia
Your dad a federal employee? Cut his head off and follow me to freedom!
Brain James and that avatard of his are dementia-rich, not Hillary
Gulag, son
If trump never intended anything resembling a riot or insurrection , but just peaceful protest , why the needs of 10000 nationals guard troops in advance ?
Seem he knew in advance what kinda of people would end up there ….
Better yet, imagine knowing you need 10000 troops but being such an ineffective leader as POTUS that you can't get your staff to provide such manpower at your event.
So u agree a normal peaceful protest only need 10000 national guard troops ?
I agree , the maga movement is certainly not a peace movement …
Trump knew better I give him that !
Trump does not look at Steve Bannon and think this guy is unhinged; he’s looking
at Steve Bannon and saying this is exactly what I want to hear from my supporters.
“Welcome to the end of democracy!” Posobiec told the CPAC crowd.
“We’re here to overthrow it completely. We didn’t get all the way there on Jan. 6,
but we will endeavor to get rid of it and replace it with this right here,”
MAGA is mainlining what Bannon is selling.
Maybe it's just me but doesn't it seem a bit weird to request 10000 troops to prevent your own insurrection?
If Pence was going to go along with stealing the election, the national guard would be needed to preserve the theft.
If Trump could order the national guard to help steal the election, why would he need unarmed rioters to do it?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_cou....
A soft coup, sometimes referred to as a silent coup, is an illegal overthrow of a government. Unlike a classical coup d'état, it is achieved without the use of force or violence
He studied the potential to spark, guide, and maximize the power of sometimes short-lived mass uprisings, as he tried to understand how unarmed insurrections have been far more politically significant than observers focused on military warfare have cared to admit.[2]
He could not order the national guard to steal the election. He needed the moron brigade to give some credence to his lies. But the people storming the capitol were in his words, low class and seen as neo confederate terrorists rather than legitimate protesters.
So why did he request the 10000 national guard troops then?
