Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
It's true that politics is always going to be contentious. But the reason horrible posters make a beeline for politics is because they can get away with being disruptive clowns.
Also, there's absolutely no reason we can't have a containment thread here, other than the mods seem to enjoy making their job harder than it needs to be.
There is a conspiracy containment thread. An ******* containment thread is a little harder to enforce.
Trolly craves locking his enemies up in containment threads. Always has.
Ya, no one actually seems to be contained by the conspiracy containment thread afaict.
Just make a big containment thread for people who want to talk about eugenics or spout conspiracy nonsense or call transgender people mentally ill, throw those posters in it, and walk away.
Mod question: can I put sexually explicit pictures from books recently banned by republicans from some public high schools in this forum? Because it looks like some people don't know the extent of what is being banned and so unless they see what we are actually talking about, they can't understand the pro ban position
Mod question: can I put sexually explicit pictures from books recently banned by republicans from some public high schools in this forum? Because it looks like some people don't know the extent of what is being banned and so unless they see what we are actually talking about, they can't understand the pro ban position
In before we find out that Naughty Cheerleaders Volume 27 is a "book recently banned from public high schools." In which case I'm all for it; my only reservation is if I will still be able to follow along with the plot, not having read volumes 1-25?
Mod question: can I put sexually explicit pictures from books recently banned by republicans from some public high schools in this forum? Because it looks like some people don't know the extent of what is being banned and so unless they see what we are actually talking about, they can't understand the pro ban position
I think it's more like you're assuming people don't know because they aren't as outraged as you. But if you're really concerned, the simple solution would be to post a link, like to something I'll post in that thread now - a newspaper that has posted some *shocking* 🙄 images from Gender Queer.
Mod question: can I put sexually explicit pictures from books recently banned by republicans from some public high schools in this forum? Because it looks like some people don't know the extent of what is being banned and so unless they see what we are actually talking about, they can't understand the pro ban position
I'm not a mod but I definitely encourage you to describe these images in as much lurid detail as possible.
Ya, no one actually seems to be contained by the conspiracy containment thread afaict.
Just make a big containment thread for people who want to talk about eugenics or spout conspiracy nonsense or call transgender people mentally ill, throw those posters in it, and walk away.
I've got a better idea. Why not put you in a containment thread so we don't have to listen to you whining all the time and everyone else can talk about w/e they like (within forum rules).
Mod question: can I put sexually explicit pictures from books recently banned by republicans from some public high schools in this forum? Because it looks like some people don't know the extent of what is being banned and so unless they see what we are actually talking about, they can't understand the pro ban position
Are you unable to describe the pictures using words?
Lol
I think Bobos suggestion of a link rather than an image would work best. Just put a warning in the post. And please make sure the link doesn't go to one of those sites where you get a million nsfw pop ups that are difficult to remove. I hate that when that happens.
I think Bobos suggestion of a link rather than an image would work best. Just put a warning in the post. And please make sure the link doesn't go to one of those sites where you get a million nsfw pop ups that are difficult to remove. I hate that when that happens.
Bobo himself linked that already so we are fine thx
Where's the link to the porn?
I don't want to pollute this mod thread with stuff that belongs elsewhere, but I am unsure where else to respond to this. I remember being a sixth grader and reading those YA Christopher Pike books which had pretty graphic descriptions of teenagers having sex, in addition to murders and other fun stuff that every 12 year old kid loves. I don't recall it being some huge controversy back then that there were books that described sixteen year olds having all sorts of sex.
When you were claiming that these challenged books were "porn", I was under the impression that we were talking about images in the books. I looked up a couple of these, and we are talking about descriptions that are in many (if not most) books made for teenagers. Is this really what you are up in arms about? Is it because some of these books describe gay acts rather than heterosexual acts?
I don't want to pollute this mod thread with stuff that belongs elsewhere, but I am unsure where else to respond to this. I remember being a sixth grader and reading those YA Christopher Pike books which had pretty graphic descriptions of teenagers having sex, in addition to murders and other fun stuff that every 12 year old kid loves. I don't recall it being some huge controve
Images, not textual descriptions.
Just check the first book of the list around.
Google "gender queer worst images"
You said there were sexually explicit images. Why do you lie so often?
This is the post that actually has the link to some of the images
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...
linking the post rather than the external link so that it can be seen in the context of the conversation and replies can be made to that post rather than in here.
Besides that first graphic novel, do any of the others have images?
The first book is probably not appropriate for children in elementary school, but I don't think it would be a big deal for teenagers to be exposed to that, but wtf do I know.
Besides that first graphic novel, do any of the others have images?
The first book is probably not appropriate for children in elementary school, but I don't think it would be a big deal for teenagers to be exposed to that, but wtf do I know.
Ive got a question to pose about this subject, but will put it in the boc thread.
For those who wish to continue the search for porn over there rather than here.
Thanks
