Capitol attack and 6th of January hearings

I've actually had that guy on ignore for quite a while. The insults were getting rather tedious so it seemed the logical thing to do.

Might have to do the same with you come to think of it.

Funny how everyone round here dogpiles on poor BJ when he's done absolutely nothing do deserve it.

He is my hero!

Oh I've already shown you proof that enough evidence for a court to decide on the matter exists. I have no further obligations on that. I even directed you to the decision and a listing of all the evidence and arguments. Your response was "lol I'm not going to look at that."

And I'll let you in on a little secret: it doesn't matter one way or the other if you agree, disagree, or just keep your head in the sand. Not even a little. Nobody here owes you walking through the evidence, and nobody here cares whether you use that as an excuse to not believe.

Why do you even waste time on this clown?

So you can't provide the evidence then. Just as I thought.

Man, you are so predictable.

For the benefit of those that read his disinformation and may not know there's another side to the story.

Also for me personally, I went through a good chunk of my life conservative (I grew up in Alberta) and it took being embarrassed repeatedly before I finally realized I needed to have facts before I opened my mouth. So I like to do that to others in the hopes that having it happen enough times might finally get them to wake up.

That presupposes that they're acting in good faith, which that ****tard quite clearly isn't.

No, no. You don't get to pretend I didn't.

Nah, it's mostly for the other people. For him, I realize it's a lost cause. I just don't want anyone else to be taken in by it.

This trial was not "run online."

In fact, they did. Why do you think they did not?

The supreme court did not rule in this finding at all. They ruled on whether a state could exclude Trump from their ballot.

That is correct. They are. But that does not make this fact finding "improper" in any way.

No. There was an actual trial. It was a 5 day trial in a courtroom. Trump had a defense team representing him. There was evidence submitted and argued over, and lots of oral arguments. You can find this easily online. I've even given proper citations to it.

This is entirely inaccurate. The SCOTUS told us that congress should be the one to enforce exclusion via article 3. It didn't say a word about who decides if Trump engaged in insurrection. It had nothing to do with that at all.

You are, unsurprisingly, completely misinformed.

Thinking has nothing to do with it.

It's posts like this that make me completely support your future attempts to discuss eugenics in detail here.

Exemplary job by Gorgonian pointing out most of the major points you were wrong about in his post above.

Man this is getting tiresome. As I said before the onus is on you to provide the evidence. Telling me to go and search some court records myself is not providing evidence no matter how often you repeat it. Until you do I will assume that the evidence doesn't exist.

Either post the actual evidence or go away and stop wasting my time.

Then do it. Nobody cares what you think Brian.

So, still no evidence then. I'm shocked I tell you. Shocked.

lol

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showp...

And when you try replying the same way below, just refer to my previous posts. You're boring.

Lol

Hey Brian, I reported you. You've been reported.

Brian Joe6pack has been reported again? For what?

I did prefer joe6pack's avatar, went better with the character.

I like his username, it's close enough to the actor Brion James who was awesome as streak in Red Heat.

One of the good movie at that time .

Yep, his SN is great. If I addressed anyone else as "Blowjob" in every post I imagine I'd get infracted, but he was considerate enough to basically make it his name.