The "LOLCANADA" thread...again
So what's new?
I've noticed the Liberals are now ahead in all major polls and Trudeau hasn't even started to campaign yet...i'd be shocked if they lost the election now.
Just shows just how incompetent Conservatives are.
Was clear to me he attached it with immigration rate being way too high for the house crisis and health care system struggling now .
Seem to me he pushes that Canada was doing the right things on many issues but he wasn’t sure anymore.
Ie: those kind of sanctuary countries and cities are creating some really big issues we didn’t had before and it’s getting worst and worst .
The left has certainly been pushing more leftish in the liberal party .
I mean what is the distinction between them and npd ?
Is there any anymore ?
I don't normally watch your bad youtube videos but I was distracted with something else so let it play out. It was across the board bad - typical for you and typical for Mayer - but it did hammer in one point. Mayer starts with various selectively chosen but unenviable economic data. No casual explanation offered. But then the big WHY? Well wokism! And then suddenly it is that big tits person lozen was so obsessed with in the trans thread for ages, no shocker this video calls to him here. Anyway
For housing it gives you the causal explanation: wokism -> unlimited immigration -> housing crisis
Small businesses should get 0% in rebates and pass on any price increases to consumers since consumers get the rebates. The government approach of only focusing on a few places that are particularly affected by both the tax AND international trade is absolutely correct policy.
Fair enough but than don’t promise rebates to small businesses
I don't normally watch your bad youtube videos but I was distracted with something else so let it play out. It was across the board bad - typical for you and typical for Mayer - but it did hammer in one point. Mayer starts with various selectively chosen but unenviable economic data. No casual explanation offered. But then the big WHY? Well wokism! And then suddenly it is that big tits person lozen was so obsessed with in the trans thread for ages, no shocker this video calls to him here. Anyway
Big Tits guy I was obsessed with. I may have posted it I know others have but its a good indication of how crazy we have become. This individual should have been told show up again with prosthetic breasts and your suspended . If a woman dressed like that with her nipples protruding she would be asked to change. Its just a highlight of the craziness in the mane of Trans ideology including tampons in men's washrooms mandated by Justin
He also focuses on our unemployment rate compared to the USA , how bad our healthcare system is and the fact that we brought in so many legal immigrants that has contributed to the housing crisis. He never tried to connect the big boobs dude to healthcare or unemployment
None of these are not true
Did you read your post? You are just as bad as Mayer. From sentence to sentence you jump between this extremely isolated fringe case of a random person being "bad" in your eyes, to uh, macroeconomic indicators like the unemployment. Do you not get whiplash from that juxtaposition? People used to at least try to have a narrative flow and connective tissue in their arguments. Now it is just throwing darts at anything/everything/whatever bad people can come up with - Justin Trudeau being supposedly bad in every and any context is the "coherence".
And just lol at the fragile ego of cis men unable to process that some trans men menstruate and having access to tampons is a reasonable thing is hilarious.
female who think they are men can menstruate, unclear why we should provide them tampons in bathrooms anyway, can't they just ****ing buy them?
would you provide barber tools in female (or male???) bathrooms?
i am a normal man and I don't want you to provide me with tools to shave in a public bathroom
Did you read your post? You are just as bad as Mayer. From sentence to sentence you jump between this extremely isolated fringe case of a random person being "bad" in your eyes, to uh, macroeconomic indicators like the unemployment. Do you not get whiplash from that juxtaposition? People used to at least try to have a narrative flow and connective tissue in their arguments. Now it is just throwing darts at anything/everything/whatever bad people can come up with - Justin Trudeau being supposedly
Nope this man isnt fragile he just realizes the science that men do not menstrate or can get pregnant . I just call out idiotic things Justin does just as i Call out his lie that 8 out of 10 CDN"s get more back in rebates than they pay in carbon tax
Nope this man isnt fragile he just realizes the science that men do not menstrate or can get pregnant .x
I don't get why people try and play the fool about this. You're not that much of an idiot. You can figure out that the point is trans men who can have vaginas and can menstrate and thus use tampons etc. You can be all hoping mad at the idea that a trans man might share a bathroom with you - if you must - but quite this stupid game where you pretend to not understand.
I don't get why people try and play the fool about this. You're not that much of an idiot. You can figure out that the point is trans men who can have vaginas and can menstrate and thus use tampons etc. You can be all hoping mad at the idea that a trans man might share a bathroom with you - if you must - but quite this stupid game where you pretend to not understand.
You can figure out that point is there are people who disagree with the whole radical leftist construct of using the word "man" to address an individual who can menstruate.
There are people who don't buy gender theory semantics, and it's proper to say that in all occasions, denying what radical marxists decided words should mean.
I don't get why people try and play the fool about this. You're not that much of an idiot. You can figure out that the point is trans men who can have vaginas and can menstrate and thus use tampons etc. You can be all hoping mad at the idea that a trans man might share a bathroom with you - if you must - but quite this stupid game where you pretend to not understand.
I personally do not care if a trans man share a washroom we all know he isn't using a urinal and I couldn't care less if they are in the cubicle beside me .
You can figure out that point is there are people who disagree with the whole radical leftist construct of using the word "man" to address an individual who can menstruate.
There are people who don't buy gender theory semantics, and it's proper to say that in all occasions, denying what radical marxists decided words should mean.
I do concur there may be the odd trans individual out there but no where at the rate now kids do it for attention . Ill treat any trans individual like I treat a religious person. They both believe in a ideology that science can not prove exists . Ill use he or she pronouns but sorry I will not used the other 60 as they are total BS
I personally do not care if a trans man share a washroom we all know he isn't using a urinal and I couldn't care less if they are in the cubicle beside me .
I'm so proud of you. But then why did you pretend like you didn't understand the concept that a trans man might be menstruating when using the cubicle beside you?
It's kind of funny that this lives rent free in the minds of...........people like you. I collect name/pronoun surveys for thousands of students. Beyond he/she/they I don't think I've a single time been asked by a student to use another pronoun, let alone 60 other pronouns. I suspect most of the people getting all high and mighty that they will refuse to address someone the way that person asks to be addressed also haven't experienced it.
Smart move by Trudeau. Speculation was high this week that some form of increased taxes on the rich would happen. Now we have the answer, affecting only the top 0.13% of people, capital gains will rise from 50% inclusion to 66% inclusion on amounts over a quarter million, raising 19 billion dollars over the next 5 years. Smart.
I'm so proud of you. But then why did you pretend like you didn't understand the concept that a trans man might be menstruating when using the cubicle beside you?
It's kind of funny that this lives rent free in the minds of...........people like you. I collect name/pronoun surveys for thousands of students. Beyond he/she/they I don't think I've a single time been asked by a student to use another pronoun, let alone 60 other pronouns. I suspect most of the people getting all high and mighty that t
I wonder if the pronoun “it” will become in fashion soon ….
I doubt that. I've regularly seen anti-trans people on the internet makes haha jokes about using a pronoun more commonly used to describes objects than people, but not among non-binary people themselves.
I guess there is a distinction between trans people and non gender people ?
I have trouble seeing the connection .
Not lucky lozen .
Seem small entreprises will finally benefit from the carbon tax rebates after all, thx to JT.
Another loss for Poilievre .
Not lucky lozen .
Seem small entreprises will finally benefit from the carbon tax rebates after all, thx to JT.
Another loss for Poilievre .
So are you telling me he said he would rebate small businesses than said he wouldn't and now will again ? Kind of like the housing crisis . flip flop Justin
The carbon tax is what will cost Justin the election
So are you telling me he said he would rebate small businesses than said he wouldn't and now will again ? Kind of like the housing crisis . flip flop Justin
The carbon tax is what will cost Justin the election
He is fulfilling yet another promise. Guy been on a role knocking them off one after another, great to see.
But it’s all manufactured? Remember how you came here complaining about this two weeks ago? It’s because the conservatives knew this was coming and were trying to get their pound of flesh in before he fulfilled the promise. And like a good boy you repeated the talking points here.
He is fulfilling yet another promise. Guy been on a role knocking them off one after another, great to see.
But it’s all manufactured? Remember how you came here complaining about this two weeks ago? It’s because the conservatives knew this was coming and were trying to get their pound of flesh in before he fulfilled the promise. And like a good boy you repeated the talking points here.
I’ll believe it when the checks are sent out . So no plans ever for a balanced budget just capping how big deficits will be . I thought budgets would balance themselves
Absolutely, I'll check back July 1st I think it is when checks go out to see if you are giving Trudeau credit for YET ANOTHER PROMISE FULLFILLED.
The liberals have, correctly, been fairly clear not about "balanced budgets", but about keeping deficits within a specified window in relation to the size of the economy. Unlike say an individual household, running a deficit at the macroeconomic scale isn't necessarily a problem in and of itself, and most advanced economies have debt. It needs guardrails, of course, as the liberals have repeatedly established in their framework and one of the reasons for the EXCELLENT choice of taxing the wealth more via capital gains was because without that the liberals would have run up against the guardrails they set for themselves. All in all, a pretty decent budget.
Absolutely, I'll check back July 1st I think it is when checks go out to see if you are giving Trudeau credit for YET ANOTHER PROMISE FULLFILLED.
The liberals have, correctly, been fairly clear not about "balanced budgets", but about keeping deficits within a specified window in relation to the size of the economy. Unlike say an individual household, running a deficit at the macroeconomic scale isn't necessarily a problem in and of itself, and most advanced economies have debt. It needs guardrai
It is when inflation is over target, as deficits are inflationary.
And increasing government consumption by taxing wealth is inflationary as well: you take money which wasn't spent on goods and services by their previous owners, to spend on goods and services.
While it is true that in the past people were unnecessarily scared of deficits, they are correct to be when inflation is over target.
Luciom, I told you already I was not interested in responding to you in the Canada thread. Strangely, you seem to still reply to most of my posts regardless. I don't know if you are trying to bait me or something, but you have now earned being ignore listed for the entire forum.
Luciom, I told you already I was not interested in responding to you in the Canada thread. Strangely, you seem to still reply to most of my posts regardless. I don't know if you are trying to bait me or something, but you have now earned being ignore listed for the entire forum.
Why not he is making a valid point and lets be clear Mrs Freeland refused to answer Vassy Kapelos if this means taxing grandmas cottage when she sells
As well the Bank of Canada has warned that Canada's triple AAA credit rating is in jeopardy with its debt
Correct me if I am wrong did not Justin promise a balanced budget?