Moderation Questions
The last iteration of the moderation discussion thread was a complete disaster. Numerous attempts to keep it on topic fa
Washoe, are you aware that many convicted defendants, possibly the majority are convicted on circumstantial evidence? Even serial killers such as Rose west? (Who you'll probably be stanning for next)
Of course i am aware of that.
Circ. evidence that cant be argued with is fine. Im all for it. Here, there is NONE
OF THAT. if there is pls show us.
Not comparable to other bulletproof cases.
Of course i am aware of that.
Circ. evidence that cant be argued with is fine. Im all for it. Here, there is NONE
OF THAT. if there is Show us.
Do you have the NHS in Irland?
If you have good luck. Its a madhouse.
What if not lucy letby did it but the NHS?
Except the evidence which got her arrested, charged tried and convicted You don't understand what evidence is.
Furthermore if you're aware that circumstantial evidence is perfectly acceptable to a court, then you've no business objecting on such grounds. You're bar raising.
washoe do you realize that under your own definitions, we could not prosecute hitler for the holocaust because the only evidence we had of his involvement is in writing
No, they said in a case like this you cannot convict someone because of these notes. It never happened before.
What do you say. You saw the notes.
Should they dismiss the notes?
Or should they have jurors make whatever they want of it?
If you cant make anything out of it, how is a Juror supposed to make a judgment?
Evidence doesn't have to be dispositive or conclusive in order to be admissible. Do you understand that?
Except the evidence which got her arrested, charged tried and convicted You don't understand what evidence is.
Furthermore if you're aware that circumstantial evidence is perfectly acceptable to a court, then you've no business objecting on such grounds. You're bar raising.
No, you dont understand what real evidence is.
Thios is the latest on the Letby case. I dont know what others seem to know as they aren't telling us.
Three of England’s most senior judges are considering whether to allow Lucy Letby to appeal against her convictions for the murder and attempted murder of babies.
The former nurse has asked the court of appeal for permission to mount a full legal challenge over her convictions for murdering seven infants and attempting to murder another six.
Letby, 34, was found guilty of those charges after a 10-month trial at Manchester crown court that ended in August, and is serving 14 whole-life prison terms.
Three appeal court judges, Lady Justice Sharp, Lord Justice Holroyde and Lady Justice Lambert, have been hearing Letby’s application for permission to appeal over three days this week.
Letby’s barrister, Benjamin Myers KC, has put forward four grounds of appeal, arguing that the judge at her trial wrongly refused applications that her legal team made during the case.
The media is not permitted to publish the details of these arguments at this stage because Letby faces a retrial in June on one count of attempted murder.
Thios is the latest on the Letby case. I dont know what others seem to know as they aren't telling us.
Great. Not even her collegues think shes guilty. The Media has to stay out of it imo. Thats what they want.
I have no clue what case Washoe has been talking about here lately but it's hilarious to read
Nope. It was predetermined someone is guilty of these crimes.
I hope none of you guys ever gets wrongfully convicted...
But it might happen....
Dude, I have no idea if it was a rock solid conviction, or a complete travesty of justice. But you know what I'll never do? Definitively assert a verdict of a trial I didn't witness was wrong and that "In this jury everyone was an idiot." based on nothing more than some Yootoooobs I watched, because that would be a ****ing clownshoes thing to do.
Washoe gunna washoe.
Does anyone else believe this is true? I don't read every thread in politics, but I don't remember this ever getting a pass.
what about that?
DC isn't a state, mongo, so the opinion held by some governor during the George Floyd protests - a time Trump actually was considering the idea - doesn't satisfy
Not in a million years, mongo
But carry on, disease brain
Trump's legal 'team' are about as dumb as those taking naps
I honestly don't give 2 shiits about that minutia, we're at the threshold of hell, mongo
on serving 2 masters, let's serve up Trump lol
Some say yes to God, but do not do his will.
Ahh... I never understand his posts so I usually skip over them. Probably the mods do the same.
shocking that you guys dont understand easily readable posts.
There are no numbers..
Show us the numbers if you have them.
The NHS has problems with understaffing and much more.
Even if u had numbers, which you dont, they dont make her guilty.
U need proof.
You don’t need proof to find someone guilty in a court of law. The standard is beyond reasonable doubt.
On an internet forum (and in a civil court) the standard is balance of probability.
Those posts are a bit unintelligible and I pledge to do better, but why does washoe have a dossier on me? Get a life, mongo
This whole politics forum is a dossier on you.
I own it.
