But... but... you've only got 99 mate??
PokerStars - $0.10 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BTN: 104 BB
Hero (SB): 100 BB
BB: 34 BB
UTG: 387 BB
MP: 182 BB
CO: 100 BB
Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 9♠ 9♥
fold, fold, fold, BTN raises to 3 BB, Hero raises to 12 BB, fold, BTN calls 6 BB
Flop: (22 BB, 2 players) T♠ 6♠ 3♥
Hero bets 7 BB, BTN calls 6 BB
Turn: (35 BB, 2 players) 5♣
Hero checks, BTN bets 24 BB, Hero raises to 85 BB and is all-in
You bet big on these flops so don't like cbet sizing.
Just call turn you are ahead, jamming doesn't make much sense.
Hero bets 7, BTN calls 6? 😝
Busted
Fake hh converter needs more work
Call on the Turn.
I was way too ill the other day and couldn't explain myself.
Reason I posted was because it caught me out while playing a gto+ solution.
Solver likes putting 99 in the x/jam range. And as I don't really have a bluff x/jam range I thought it was interesting. It also uses 99 when fed a pool based/fishier button calling range. GTOw doesn't, but the GTOw button calling range for this spot is way too unrealistic to be useful imo.
Anyway, i'm x/jamming KK/QQ/JJ here (much more than a solver would because it seems more effective IRL). So having at least some bluffs seems apt. Not sure about using FDs because we want BU to have all those? And i think BU will have stab/folds and FDs that we actually dominate even when called in his range, so it sort of makes sense to use some mergey punts to neutralise. Just wasn't sure it's applicable enough at micros.
ah, I was looking at 50nl sim because i'm a micro fish
(AJ lol jam)
GTO+ with realistic pool BU calling range:
ah, I was looking at 50nl sim because i'm a micro fish
(AJ lol jam)
GTO+ with realistic pool BU calling range:
I think the problem with the 50nl sim is it's not even giving bigger sizing's as an option. It just has B33/Jam so naturally it will pick B33.
My general approach is to play GTO OTF and then to exploit on later streets where the discrepancies are bigger between theory and population (and the pot is bigger). I wouldn't classify B33 OTF as a mistake I just prefer a bigger sizing for this reason.
Ok, fair point
PokerStars - $0.10 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BTN: 104 BB
Hero (SB): 100 BB
BB: 34 BB
UTG: 387 BB
MP: 182 BB
CO: 100 BB
Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 9♠ 9♥
fold, fold, fold, BTN raises to 3 BB, Hero raises to 12 BB, fold, BTN calls 6 BB
Flop: (22 BB, 2 players) T♠ 6♠ 3♥
Hero bets 7 BB, BTN calls 6 BB
Turn: (35 BB, 2 players) 5♣
Hero checks, BTN bets 24 BB, Hero raises to 85 BB and is all-in
whats the reason you fake hand histories?
to piss you off
I like this with 99 vs pool. People don't 4-bet enough and probably stab too much of their air OTT when we bet small flop. Tbh small bet flop could be interesting exploit although I think B50 preferred. Don't think we need to go B75 against pool given how they construct 4-bets
One concern is likely not enough xr OTF with Tx vs the smaller size.
Yeah I think lack of 4b is relevant to both spots. On the one hand they have far more TT+, but on the other they're so ridiculously diluted with junk on turn (my pool data is something like 3x overcall vs gto preflop)
One concern is likely not enough xr OTF with Tx vs the smaller size.